UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(Amendment No.)
Filed by the registrant x Filed by a Party other than the registrant ¨
Check the appropriate box:
| ¨ | Preliminary proxy statement | |||||||||||||
| ¨ | Confidential, for use of the commission only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) | |||||||||||||
| x | Definitive proxy statement | |||||||||||||
| ¨ | Definitive additional materials | |||||||||||||
| ¨ | Soliciting material under § 240.14a-12 | |||||||||||||
| AUTODESK, INC. | ||||||||||||||
| (Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter) | ||||||||||||||
| (Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant) | ||||||||||||||
| Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box): | ||||||||||||||
| x | No fee required. | |||||||||||||
| ¨ | Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. | |||||||||||||
| ¨ | Fee computed on table in exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. | |||||||||||||
May 9, 2023
Dear Autodesk Stockholder:
You are cordially invited to attend Autodesk’s 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on Wednesday, June 21, 2023, beginning at 3:00 p.m., Pacific Time. This year’s Annual Meeting will be held in a virtual format, through a live audio webcast. We will provide the webcast of the Annual Meeting at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/ADSK2023. Autodesk stockholders will have the opportunity to listen to the meeting live, submit questions, and vote online. A webcast with the entire Annual Meeting will be available on the Autodesk Investor Relations website after the meeting. For further information on how to participate in the meeting, please see the section titled “Information About the 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders” in this Proxy Statement.
The Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and Proxy Statement contain details of the business to be conducted during the Annual Meeting.
Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, it is important that your shares be represented and voted. We urge you to promptly vote and submit your proxy (1) via the Internet, (2) by phone, or (3) if you received your proxy materials by mail, by signing, dating, and returning the enclosed proxy card or voting instruction form in the envelope provided for your convenience. Your vote is very important.
We hope you will be able to attend this year’s Annual Meeting. This year’s Annual Meeting will include an opportunity for stockholders to ask questions. You may submit a question in advance of the meeting at proxyvote.com after logging in with the control number found next to the label for postal mail recipients or within the body of the email sending you the Proxy Statement. Live questions may be submitted online beginning shortly before the start of the Annual Meeting through www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/ADSK2023.
On behalf of the Board of Directors, I would like to express our appreciation for your continued support of Autodesk.
Very truly yours,
Andrew Anagnost
President and Chief Executive Officer
Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders
| Date | Wednesday, June 21, 2023 | |||||||||||||
| Time | 3:00 p.m., Pacific Time | |||||||||||||
| Virtual Meeting | This year’s meeting is a virtual stockholders meeting at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/ADSK2023. | |||||||||||||
| Record Date | April 24, 2023. Only stockholders of record at the close of business on the record date are entitled to receive notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting. | |||||||||||||
| Proxy Voting | Your vote is very important. Even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, we encourage you to vote in advance. You can vote your shares now via the Internet, by telephone, or by signing, dating, and returning the enclosed proxy card or voting instruction form. If you attend the Annual Meeting, you may vote online during the Annual Meeting even if you previously voted. | |||||||||||||
| Address of Corporate Headquarters | One Market Street, Suite #400, San Francisco, CA 94105 | |||||||||||||
| Meeting Details | See the section titled “Information About the 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders” in this Proxy Statement. | |||||||||||||
| ITEMS OF BUSINESS | BOARD RECOMMENDATION | ||||||||||
| (1) | To elect the eleven directors listed in the accompanying Proxy Statement to serve for the coming year and until their successors are duly elected and qualified. | FOR each director nominee | |||||||||
| (2) | To ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending January 31, 2024. | FOR | |||||||||
| (3) | To hold a non-binding vote to approve compensation for our named executive officers. | FOR | |||||||||
| (4) | To hold a non-binding vote on the frequency of executive compensation votes. | 1 YEAR | |||||||||
Important notice regarding the availability of proxy materials for the Annual Meeting to be held on June 21, 2023. Our 2023 Proxy Statement and Annual Report to Stockholders are available at: https://materials.proxyvote.com/052769
By Order of the Board of Directors,
| Ruth Ann Keene | ||
| Executive Vice President, Corporate Affairs, Chief Legal Officer and Corporate Secretary | ||
May 9, 2023 | ||
| Table of Contents | |||||
Director Nominees | |||||
Summary Compensation Table | |||||
Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions | |||||
Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports | |||||
Special Note About Forward-Looking Statements
This proxy statement includes statements regarding future plans, expectations, beliefs, intentions and prospects that are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Forward-looking statements may appear throughout this proxy statement. The words “will,” “expects,” “could,” “would,” “may,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “seeks,” “targets,” “estimates,” “looks for,” “looks to,” “continues” and similar expressions, as well as statements regarding our focus for the future, are generally intended to identify forward-looking statements. Each of the forward-looking statements we make in this proxy statement involves risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from these forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, those discussed in the section titled “Risk Factors” of our Forms 10-K and 10-Q. Undue reliance should not be placed on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this proxy statement. We undertake no obligation to publicly release any revisions to the forward-looking statements or reflect events or circumstances after the date of this proxy statement, except as required by law.
No Incorporation By Reference
This proxy statement includes several website addresses and references to additional materials found on those websites. These websites and materials are not incorporated by reference herein.
Fiscal Year
Our fiscal year ends on January 31. References to “fiscal year 2023,” for example, refer to the fiscal year ended January 31, 2023.
Fiscal Year 2023 Strategic Priorities and Performance Highlights
Autodesk empowers innovators to achieve the new possible, delivering technology that enables our customers to achieve better outcomes for their products, their businesses, and the world. In fiscal year 2023, we delivered record revenue, cash flow from operating activities, and free cash flow.
We achieved strong financial and competitive performance in fiscal 2023 despite macroeconomic, policy, geopolitical and pandemic related headwinds. Several factors contributed to our performance, including robust renewal rates, strong growth in subscriptions, rapidly expanding digital sales with the approaching transition from up-front to annual billings for multi-year contracts, and a large renewal cohort which provided an additional tailwind to billings and free cash flow.
Enduring strengths underpinned our results. Resilience was derived from our subscription business model and geographic, product, and customer diversification. Cloud-based platforms and services represent an expanding market opportunity as customers adopt our next-generation technology and services to enable transformation within and between the industries we serve. Finally, disciplined and focused capital deployment through the economic cycle enables Autodesk to remain sufficiently well invested to realize the significant benefits of its strategy while mitigating the risk of having to make expensive catch-up investments in the future.
While macroeconomic, policy, and geopolitical uncertainty have considerable human and economic impacts, in many ways these impacts have accelerated the pace of change and increased our confidence in our strategy to transform the industries we serve with end-to-end, cloud-based solutions that enable our customers to drive efficiency and sustainability. The structural growth drivers underpinning this strategy have been reinforced by the pandemic and macroeconomic uncertainty, including increased workflow convergence and platform standardization; a growing focus on distributed working in the cloud, automation, and workforce productivity; and also the growing importance of sustainability.
We can see the fruits of that opportunity already. We signed our largest-ever Enterprise Business Agreement (“EBA”) in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2023, encompassing more personas and connecting more workflows in the cloud to drive efficiency and sustainability.
Empowering innovators with design-and-make technology to achieve the new possible enables them to build and manufacture efficiently and sustainably. We continue to execute well in challenging times and look forward to the years ahead with excitement and optimism.
| TOTAL REVENUE | INCOME FROM OPERATIONS | NON-GAAP INCOME FROM OPERATIONS (1) | ||||||||||||
 14% from fiscal year 2022 | 60% from fiscal year 2022 | 28% from fiscal year 2022 | ||||||||||||
| $5.01B | $989M | $1.79B | ||||||||||||
| CASH FLOW FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES | FREE CASH FLOW (1) | 5-Y TOTAL SHAREHOLDER RETURN | ||||||||||||
| 35% from fiscal year 2022 | 37% from fiscal year 2022 | 86% from fiscal year 2018 | ||||||||||||
| $2.07B | $2.03B | 86% | ||||||||||||
_________________
(1) A reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP results is provided in Appendix A.
2023 Proxy Statement | 1
Corporate Governance Highlights
Our Board of Directors and Governance
We believe that by staying true to our values, investing in our broader community, and focusing relentlessly on the outcomes we seek, we will fulfill our vision of a better world, designed and made for all. One of the key components to achieving our goal is the adoption of strong governance practices, informed by conversations with and participation from our stockholders.
Having a highly qualified and independent Board that is well suited to continue providing effective oversight of our rapidly evolving business is crucial to our achievement of long-term success. Our Board believes that having a diverse mix of directors with complementary qualifications, expertise, and attributes is essential to meeting its oversight responsibility. Our director nominees provide our Board with a balance of relevant critical skills and an effective mix of experience, knowledge, and diverse viewpoints. Of our 11 Board nominees, 10 are independent. Having an independent Board is a key component of our governance strategy.
Our Board is committed to ensuring that stockholder feedback informs our strong governance practices. In fiscal year 2023, members of our management team and, in certain instances, independent members of our Board continued our regular outreach and contacted stockholders representing approximately 51% of our outstanding shares and provided stockholder feedback to the Board.
Our Director Nominees
The following table provides summary information about each of our director nominees. Each director is elected annually by a majority of votes cast. Each of our directors, other than Dr. Anagnost, our Chief Executive Officer, is an “independent director” within the meaning of applicable Nasdaq Global Select Market (“NASDAQ”) listing standards.
| Name | Age | Director Since | Principal Occupation | Independent | Committees | ||||||||||||||||||
| AC | CHRC | CGNC | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Andrew Anagnost | 58 | 2017 | President and Chief Executive Officer, Autodesk, Inc. | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Stacy J. Smith | 60 | 2011 | Executive Chairman, Kioxia Corporation | ü CB | ü | ||||||||||||||||||
| Karen Blasing | 66 | 2018 | Former Chief Financial Officer, Guidewire Software, Inc. | ü | ü À | ||||||||||||||||||
| Reid French | 51 | 2017 | Former Chief Executive Officer, Applied Systems, Inc. | ü | ü | ||||||||||||||||||
| Dr. Ayanna Howard | 51 | 2019 | Dean of the College of Engineering at The Ohio State University; CTO, Co-founder, Zyrobotics | ü | ü | ||||||||||||||||||
| Blake Irving | 63 | 2019 | Former Chief Executive Officer, GoDaddy Inc. | ü | ü | ||||||||||||||||||
| Mary T. McDowell | 58 | 2010 | Former Chief Executive Officer, Mitel Networks Corporation | ü | C | ||||||||||||||||||
| Stephen Milligan | 59 | 2018 | Former Chief Executive Officer, Western Digital Corporation | ü | ü À | ||||||||||||||||||
| Lorrie M. Norrington | 63 | 2011 | Adviser and Operating Partner, Lead Edge Capital Management, LLC | ü | C | ||||||||||||||||||
| Elizabeth (Betsy) Rafael | 61 | 2013 | Former Chief Transformation Officer, GoDaddy Inc. | ü | C À | ||||||||||||||||||
| Rami Rahim | 52 | 2022 | Chief Executive Officer, Juniper Networks, Inc. | ü | ü | ||||||||||||||||||
CB Non-Executive Chair of Board C Committee Chair ü Member À Financial Expert, as defined in the rules of the SEC
AC Audit Committee
CHRC Compensation and Human Resources Committee
CGNC Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee
2 | AUTODESK, INC.
Our Director Nominees’ Diversity and Skills Metrics
* Our Board includes one female director who identifies as African American, one director who identifies as Middle-Eastern and one female director who identifies as LGBTQ+.
** Director tenure is measured by completed years of service from the initial month of service through the filing of Autodesk’s annual Proxy Statement.
2023 Proxy Statement | 3
Corporate Governance Guidelines
We believe the highest standards of corporate governance and business conduct are essential to running our business efficiently, serving our stockholders well, and maintaining our integrity in the marketplace. Over the years, we have devoted substantial attention to the subject of corporate governance and have developed Corporate Governance Guidelines, which set forth the principles that guide our Board in overseeing corporate governance, maintaining its independence, evaluating its own performance and the performance of our executive officers, and setting corporate strategy. The Board reviews our governance practices, corporate governance developments, and stockholder feedback on a regular basis to ensure continued effectiveness.
Executive Compensation Highlights
Compensation Guiding Principles
The Compensation Committee believes that Autodesk’s executive compensation program should be designed to attract, motivate, and retain talented executives and should provide a rigorous framework that is tied to stockholder returns, company performance, long-term strategic corporate goals, and individual performance. The general compensation objectives are to:
•Recruit and retain the highest caliber of executives through competitive rewards;
•Motivate executive officers to achieve business and financial goals;
•Balance rewards for short- and long-term performance; and
•Align rewards with stockholder value creation.
Within this framework, the total compensation for each executive officer varies based on multiple dimensions:
•Whether Autodesk achieves its short-term and long-term financial and non-financial objectives;
•Autodesk’s TSR relative to companies in the North American Technology Software Index;
•The specific role and responsibilities of the officer;
•Each individual officer’s skills, competency, contributions, and performance;
•Internal pay alignment considerations; and
•Retention considerations.
4 | AUTODESK, INC.
Leading Compensation Governance Practices
Autodesk’s executive compensation objectives are supported by policies and strong governance practices that align executives’ interests with the interests of our stockholders. Some of the program’s most notable features are highlighted in the table below and summarized in the section titled “Compensation Discussion and Analysis.”
| What We Do | What We Do Not Do | |||||||||||||
| a | Engage in robust stockholder outreach | x | Allow hedging, pledging, or trading in Autodesk derivative securities | |||||||||||
| a | Tie a significant percentage of NEO total pay to achievement of critical financial and stockholder value creation | x | Reprice stock options | |||||||||||
| a | Employ maximum payouts on performance-based cash and equity incentive compensation | x | Offer executive benefits and excessive perquisites | |||||||||||
| a | Require significant stock ownership requirements | x | Use fixed-term employment agreements | |||||||||||
| a | Include a clawback policy in incentive programs | |||||||||||||
| a | Provide double-trigger change in control arrangements with no excise tax gross-up | |||||||||||||
| a | Ensure effective risk management | |||||||||||||
| a | Rely on an independent compensation committee and engage an independent compensation consultant | |||||||||||||
2023 Proxy Statement | 5
Environment, Social, and Governance Programs
Impact at Autodesk
Autodesk is committed to furthering our goal of advancing a more sustainable, resilient, and inclusive world. We don’t believe in waiting for progress, we believe in making it. We take action as a business and support and empower our employees, customers, and communities in our collective opportunity to design and make a better world for all.
We focus our efforts on advancing positive outcomes across three primary areas: energy and materials, health and resilience, and work and prosperity. These impact opportunity areas are derived from the UN Sustainable Development Goals (“SDGs”) and have been focused through a multi-pronged process to align the top needs of our stakeholders, the important issues of our business, and the areas we are best placed to accelerate positive impact at scale.
These opportunities manifest as outcomes through how our customers leverage our technology to design and make net-zero carbon buildings, resilient infrastructure, more sustainable products, and a thriving workforce. We realize these opportunities in our business through neutralizing our greenhouse gas emissions, powering our operations with 100% renewable energy and promoting an inclusive culture. We advance these opportunities with industry innovators through collaboration, grants, software donations, and training.
Board Engagement and Oversight
Our Board is committed to building trust with our employees, customers, and communities through strong corporate governance, effective oversight, and strategic engagement. We leverage our governance structure to help ensure that our sustainability and diversity efforts are coordinated across all areas of our business. Our Board has oversight responsibility for ESG, with assistance from our Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee and our Compensation and Human Resources Committee in specific areas defined in their committee charters.
Our Board receives updates from management on our environmental, social, and governance initiatives and values feedback from our stockholders on these efforts. In fiscal year 2023, members of our management team, and in certain instances independent members of our Board, engaged with stockholders owning approximately 51% of our outstanding shares, and met with many of our top investors to discuss topics including strategy, our executive and employee compensation programs, workforce diversity, board composition, and a broad range of ESG issues, including Autodesk’s efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions associated with the industries we serve. Our directors also engage with our employees in various ways throughout the year, developing direct relationships below the executive management level. For example, members of our Board attend Autodesk’s annual leadership meetings, participate in fireside chats with employees, and visit our technology centers and other facilities.
Our Impact Team, led by our VP of ESG and Impact has direct responsibility for setting and implementing our corporate sustainability strategy, with oversight from our CEO and Board. This role also chairs the ESG Steering Committee, an internal management body responsible for oversight and coordination of ESG issues across the business. The Impact Team reports on sustainability matters and major initiatives, including progress against sustainability goals and targets, to our CEO and Board.
Talent and Human Capital Management
Diversity, Inclusion and Belonging
Autodesk is committed to building and maintaining a diverse workforce and a culture of belonging that welcomes people from all backgrounds, perspectives, and beliefs. We have developed and embedded a holistic global Diversity and Belonging (“D&B”) strategy into all that we do. Our D&B strategy includes a variety of activities, such as inclusive leadership training for all people managers and senior employees, and hiring manager and interview classes that include training on mitigating bias and inclusive practices.
To help us build a more diverse workforce, we have continued to invest in our diversity partnerships with educational institutions such as Hispanic-Serving Institutions and Historically Black Colleges and Universities, and professional
6 | AUTODESK, INC.
organizations around the globe supporting underrepresented groups in technology. We provide a variety of scholarships, internship programs, sponsorship agreements, mentoring and development partnerships, and program support to organizations focused on women and underrepresented groups.
We provide ongoing development opportunities, such as the Autodesk Mentorship Program, which provides one-on-one mentorship relationships. Autodesk has nine employee resource groups (“ERGs”), which are volunteer-led groups that bring employees together based on common interests, backgrounds or diversity characteristics, to foster a sense of belonging and connection.
Our commitment to diversity extends across all levels of our company, including our senior leadership. The addition of our new Chief People Officer and Chief Legal Officer in 2022 further expanded the diversity of our senior leadership. Today, sixty percent of both our Section 16 officers and larger executive leadership team identify as female. We emphasized the importance of diversity, including diversity of gender, ethnicity, background, skills and experience, throughout the recruiting process. We also applied more flexibility around certain parameters, such as geography and work experience, to widen the pool of potential candidates.
We recognize the importance of increasing diversity in our employee population, including representation of women and underrepresented people of color in technical and sales roles, and in leadership. In fiscal year 2021, we began publishing our EEO-1 Report externally. We also provide transparent information around our workforce composition on our website, including the composition of recent hires. Our D&B strategy and leadership recruiting process support our efforts to increase workforce diversity and maintain transparency around our progress.
Additional information on our D&B program, initiatives, and metrics can be found on our website at https://www.autodesk.com/company/diversity-and-inclusion. Information contained on or accessible through our website is not part of or incorporated by reference into this report.
Professional Development and Employee Impact
We believe career development plays an important role in keeping our employees engaged and in providing additional opportunities for them to grow and build their careers. Autodesk offers extensive professional and technical development opportunities for our employees. These include self-service online modules and personalized learning paths, professional and management development programs, and a tuition reimbursement program.
We also encourage our employees to advance our vision for a better world and support their professional development by participating in our pro bono consulting program, using paid time to volunteer, and have their charitable giving matched by the Autodesk Foundation.
Total Rewards
To attract, retain, and support our employees, we offer competitive compensation and benefits programs, several of which include an element of choice to meet the needs of our diverse and global population. In addition to competitive base pay and opportunities to receive short-term incentives, all our employees are eligible to participate in our long-term plans. We also have comprehensive health and wellness benefits, a generous time off program, an employee stock purchase plan, sabbaticals, retirement plans, financial support programs, financial tools and education, and an employee assistance program.
Education
Autodesk is committed to helping students gain the in-demand skills and certifications needed to demonstrate they are prepared for current and emerging roles in the industries we serve. We offer free educational licenses of Autodesk’s complete portfolio of professional software to verified students, educators, and accredited educational institutions worldwide. Additionally, we offer self-paced, modular learning and curriculum for K-12, post-secondary students, and educators. We intend to make Autodesk software the preferred choice for those poised to become the next generation of design, engineering, and construction professionals.
2023 Proxy Statement | 7
Environmental Sustainability
Climate Change
In addressing the global challenges posed by climate change, we make it possible for our customers to innovate and respond to associated changes in regulation, building code, physical climate parameters, and other climate-related developments. This effort can directly and indirectly create more demand for existing and new Autodesk products and services in the short and long-term. Furthermore, our leadership is committed to taking climate action and that commitment goes hand in hand with our values and reputation in the marketplace. Our FY23 Enterprise Risk Management process considered how climate impacts could affect and potentially amplify the overall significance of each identified risk and opportunity.
Climate Change Management Actions
To drive continued progress and meet growing demand, we continue to expand the solutions, education, and support we offer, helping customers secure a competitive advantage for a low-carbon future by designing high-performance buildings, resilient cities and infrastructure, and more efficient transportation and products. To continue to grow this market, we provide software and support to early-stage entrepreneurs, nonprofit organizations, and start-up companies who are designing clean technologies. We are expanding these offerings based upon demand and opportunity in response to challenges posed by climate change.
Internally, we are investing in best practices to mitigate our greenhouse gas emissions (“GHGs”) and climate change risk through investments in renewable energy, energy efficiency, and disaster management and recovery strategies. In fiscal year 2022, we deployed a new sustainability financing framework to accelerate new and existing efforts in these areas, including issuing a $1 billion sustainability bond to support eligible projects and initiatives.
Emissions Performance & Other Key Performance Indicators
In fiscal year 2023, we launched our second science-based GHG reduction target, to reduce Scope 1 and Scope 2 GHGs 50%, and reduce Scope 3 GHGs per dollar of gross profit 25%, by fiscal year 2031, compared to fiscal year 2020. Additionally, in fiscal 2022, we were responsible for 103,000 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent emissions across our operational, market-based, boundary. This represents a 55% reduction compared to our fiscal year 2020 baseline. In addition, our residual 103,000 metric tons of CO2e emissions were neutralized through the procurement of high-quality carbon offsets.
Impact Reports
More information about our sustainability financing and commitment can be found in our annual Impact Reports, which we have published on our website since 2008. Our fiscal 2023 Impact Report will be published in the second quarter of fiscal 2024.
Philanthropy
The Autodesk Foundation (the “Foundation”), a privately funded 501(c)(3) charity organization established and solely funded by us, leads our philanthropic efforts. The purpose of the Foundation is twofold: to support employees to create a better world at work, at home, and in the community by matching employees’ volunteer time and/or donations to nonprofit organizations; and to support organizations using design to drive positive social and environmental impact. In the latter case, we use philanthropic capital, software donations, and training to accomplish this goal, selecting the most impactful and innovative organizations around the world, thus leading to a better future for our planet. On our behalf, the Foundation also administers a discounted software donation program to nonprofit organizations, social and environmental entrepreneurs, and others who are developing design solutions that will shape a more sustainable future. During fiscal 2020, Autodesk committed to target 1% of annual operating margin for the long-term support of the Autodesk Foundation.
8 | AUTODESK, INC.
Governance and our Board of Directors
Autodesk is committed to the highest standards of corporate ethics and diligent compliance with financial accounting and reporting rules. Our Board provides independent leadership in the exercise of its responsibilities. Our executive officers oversee a strong system of internal controls and compliance with corporate policies and applicable laws and regulations. Our employees operate in a climate of responsibility, candor, and integrity.
Key Highlights of our Board Corporate Governance Practices:
ü | 10 out of 11 Director Nominees are Independent | ü | Annual Election of Directors and Majority Voting | ||||||||
ü | Separate Chair and CEO | ü | All our Committee Chairs are women | ||||||||
ü | Limit on Outside Directorships | ü | Proxy Access Right on Market Terms | ||||||||
ü | Annual Board and Committee Self-Evaluations, periodically using a third-party facilitator | ü | 55% of Director Nominees are Diverse (including Gender, Sexual Orientation, and Ethnicity) | ||||||||
ü | Director orientation and continuing education and strategy programs for directors | ü | Stockholder Engagement with Holders of Approximately 51% of Our Outstanding Shares in Fiscal Year 2023 | ||||||||
ü | Regular Executive Sessions of Independent Directors at quarterly Board and Committee meetings | ü | Stock Ownership Policy for Directors and Executive Officers | ||||||||
Our Board of Directors
Our business is managed under the direction of our Board, which is currently composed of eleven members. Each of our director nominees was elected by stockholders at the 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, except for Rami Rahim, who was appointed in August 2022. Each director is elected annually by a majority of votes cast. Of our 11 nominees, 10 are “independent” within the meaning of the applicable Nasdaq listing standards. There are no family relationships among any of our directors or executive officers.
We believe that our director nominees are highly qualified and well suited to continue providing effective oversight of our rapidly evolving business, and that they provide our Board with an effective mix of diverse viewpoints. The following table highlights the number of our director nominees who share certain categories of relevant critical skills, experiences and knowledge that uniquely qualify them to serve on our Board.
2023 Proxy Statement | 9
| Skills, Experience and Knowledge of Director Nominees | ||||||||||||||
 | 11 | Technology | Nominees with experience in the software and technology industries help us to analyze our research and development efforts, competing technologies, the various products and processes that we develop, and the industries in which we compete, and also help us evaluate our cybersecurity threats. | |||||||||||
 | 11 | Leadership | Nominees who have served in senior leadership positions enhance our Board’s ability to identify and develop those qualities in management. They also bring a practical understanding of organizations, processes, strategy, risk management, and methods to drive change and growth. | |||||||||||
 | 11 | Financial | Nominees who have knowledge of financial markets, financing operations, and accounting and financial reporting processes assist us in understanding, advising, and overseeing our capital structure, financing and investing activities, and our financial reporting and internal controls. | |||||||||||
 | 10 | Global Business | As a global organization with offices and customers located throughout the United States and internationally, nominees with global expertise bring useful business and cultural perspectives that relate to many significant aspects of our business. | |||||||||||
 | 10 | Public Company Board Service | Nominees who have served on other public company boards offer advice and insights on the dynamics and operation of a board of directors, the relations of a board with senior management, and oversight of a changing mix of strategic, operational, and compliance-related matters. | |||||||||||
 | 9 | M&A and Strategy | Nominees who have experience of leading corporate growth through acquisitions and other business transactions, bring the ability to assess potential targets, analyze the fit of a target with our strategy and culture, accurately value the targets and transactions, and evaluate operational integration plans. | |||||||||||
See “Director Nominees” below for more detail regarding each nominee’s qualifications and relevant experience.
Independence of the Board
Our Board’s believes independence is a critical component of our governance strategy, and that it’s continued independence enables it to be objective in carrying out its oversight responsibilities. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that a substantial majority of our directors will be independent and that each Committee will be made up of solely independent directors. Autodesk’s independent directors meet regularly in executive session, without management present, as part of the quarterly Board meetings, with the intent to facilitate open discussion. Stacy Smith, our Chair, presides at these executive sessions.
Key Highlights of our Board Independence Practices:
ü | 10 out of 11 Director Nominees are Independent - We are committed to maintaining a substantial majority of directors who are independent of the Company and management. Except for our CEO, Andrew Anagnost, all director nominees are independent. | ||||||||||
ü | We are committed to board refreshment. We aim to strike a balance between retaining directors with deep knowledge of Autodesk and adding directors with a fresh perspective. We regularly assess the balance of skills on our Board to ensure we have a diverse mix of perspectives to support our strategy. The average tenure for our director nominees is 6.8 years. | ||||||||||
ü | At each quarterly Board meeting, time is set aside for the independent directors to meet in executive session without management present. Additional executive sessions are held as needed. | ||||||||||
ü | Separate CEO and Chair. Our Chair has a clearly defined set of responsibilities, significant authority, and provides independent Board leadership. | ||||||||||
10 | AUTODESK, INC.
Director Nominees
The below biographies provide the name, age and certain biographical information as of March 31, 2023, about each nominee, and the nominees’ unique qualifications to serve on the Board.
 | Andrew Anagnost | ||||
| President and Chief Executive Officer | |||||
Age: 58 | Director since 2017 | |||||
Dr. Anagnost joined Autodesk in September 1997 and has served as President and Chief Executive Officer since June 2017. Dr. Anagnost served as Co-CEO from February 2017 to June 2017, Chief Marketing Officer from December 2016 to June 2017, and Senior Vice President, Business Strategy & Marketing, from March 2012 to June 2017. From December 2009 to March 2012, Dr. Anagnost was our Vice President, Product Suites and Web Services. Prior to this position, Dr. Anagnost served as Vice President of CAD/CAE products for our manufacturing division from March 2007 to December 2009. Previously, Dr. Anagnost held other senior management positions at Autodesk. Prior to joining Autodesk, Dr. Anagnost held various engineering, sales, marketing, and product management positions at Lockheed Aeronautical Systems Company and EXA Corporation. He also served as an NRC post-doctoral fellow at NASA Ames Research Center. Dr. Anagnost holds a bachelor of science degree in Mechanical Engineering from California State University, Northridge, and holds both an MS in Engineering Science and a PhD in Aeronautical Engineering and Computer Science from Stanford University. Qualifications and Contributions Dr. Anagnost brings to the Board extensive experience in the technology industry, and has spent two decades in management roles within Autodesk. As our President and Chief Executive Officer, Dr. Anagnost possesses a deep knowledge and understanding of Autodesk’s business, operations, and employees; the opportunities and risks we face; and management’s strategy and plans for accomplishing Autodesk’s goals. Pursuant to Dr. Anagnost’s employment agreement, Autodesk has agreed to nominate Dr. Anagnost to serve as a member of the Board for as long as he is employed by Autodesk as CEO. | |||||
2023 Proxy Statement | 11
 | Stacy J. Smith | ||||
| Non-Executive Chair of the Board of Directors | |||||
Age: 60 | Director since 2011 | Independent | |||||
| Autodesk Committees: Corporate Governance and Nominating | |||||
Mr. Smith is the non-executive Chair of the Board of Directors. Mr. Smith currently serves as the executive chairman of Kioxia Corporation (formerly Toshiba Memory Corporation), a leading flash memory company. Mr. Smith previously served as Group President of Sales, Manufacturing and Operations at Intel Corporation from February 2017 to January 2018. He served as the Executive Vice President, Manufacturing, Operations and Sales of Intel Corporation from October 2016 to February 2017. From November 2012 to October 2016, he served as Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer. Previously, Mr. Smith served as Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer from January 2010 to November 2012; Vice President, Chief Financial Officer from 2007 to 2010; and Vice President, Assistant Chief Financial Officer from 2006 to 2007. From 2004 to 2006, Mr. Smith served as Vice President, Finance and Enterprise Services and Chief Information Officer. Mr. Smith joined Intel in 1988. Mr. Smith has served on the board of directors of Kioxia Corporation since October 2018, and joined the board of Wolfspeed, Inc. in January 2023. Mr. Smith also serves on The California Chapter of The Nature Conservancy Board of Trustees and the University of Texas McCombs School of Business Advisory Board. Mr. Smith previously served on the boards of directors of Metromile, Inc., from July 2018 to February 2021, Virgin America from February 2014 until it was acquired by Alaska Air Group in December 2016, and Gevo, Inc. from June 2010 to June 2014. Qualifications and Contributions Mr. Smith is independent and his more than two decades of experience in the technology industry provide him with a strong understanding of Autodesk’s industry, business, and international operational challenges. His management positions with Intel, including his finance and executive roles, and his time spent overseas, provide him with critical insight into the operational requirements of a global company and the management and consensus-building skills required to lead our Board as non-executive Chair and to serve on our Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee. | |||||
 | Karen Blasing | ||||
Age: 66 | Director since 2018 | Independent | |||||
| Autodesk Committees: Audit | |||||
Ms. Blasing has over 25 years of executive operational and financial leadership experience in the technology industry. Ms. Blasing served as the Chief Financial Officer of Guidewire Software, Inc., an insurance software company, from 2009 to March 2015. Prior to Guidewire, Ms. Blasing served as the Chief Financial Officer for Force 10 Networks and Senior Vice President of Finance for salesforce.com, Inc. Ms. Blasing also served as Chief Financial Officer for Nuance Communications, Inc. and Counterpane Internet Security, Inc., and held senior finance roles for Informix (now IBM Informix) and Oracle Corporation. Ms. Blasing has also served on the boards of directors of Zscaler, Inc. since January 2017 and GitLab, Inc., since August 2019. Ms. Blasing previously served on the board of directors of Ellie Mae, Inc., from June 2015 to May 2019. Qualifications and Contributions Ms. Blasing is independent and has more than 25 years of executive operational and financial experience in the technology industry. Ms. Blasing’s experience at Guidewire Software, Force 10 Networks, salesforce.com, and Nuance Communications provides her with a strong understanding of Autodesk’s business and international operational challenges. Her experience as a chief financial officer provides her with the financial acumen necessary to serve on our Audit Committee. | |||||
12 | AUTODESK, INC.
 | Reid French | ||||
Age: 51 | Director since 2017 | Independent | |||||
| Autodesk Committees: Compensation and Human Resources | |||||
Mr. French has over 20 years of executive leadership experience in the software industry. Mr. French served as Chief Executive Officer of Applied Systems, Inc., a leading cloud software provider to the insurance industry, from September 2011 to June 2019, and as a member of its Board of Directors from September 2011 to January 2020. Previously, Mr. French was Chief Operating Officer at Intergraph Corporation, a global geospatial and computer-aided design software company, from April 2005 until October 2010, when Intergraph was acquired by Hexagon AB. From October 2003 to April 2005, Mr. French was Executive Vice President of Strategic Planning and Corporate Development at Intergraph. Mr. French holds a bachelor’s degree in economics from Davidson College, where he serves on the College’s board of trustees. He also holds an M.B.A. from the Harvard Business School. He sits on the board of directors of Anthology, Inc., Verint, Systems and NetDocuments Software, Inc. Qualifications and Contributions Mr. French is independent and his executive operational and strategic leadership experience in the technology industry provide him with a deep understanding of Autodesk’s technology and business. Mr. French’s years of service as an executive officer and his service on the board of directors of Applied Systems provide him with the executive compensation knowledge necessary to serve on our Compensation and Human Resources Committee. | |||||
 | Dr. Ayanna Howard | ||||
Age: 51 | Director since 2019 | Independent | |||||
| Autodesk Committees: Audit | |||||
Dr. Howard is an entrepreneur and expert in robotics, human-computer interaction, and artificial intelligence. Since March 2021, Dr. Howard has served as Dean of the College of Engineering at The Ohio State University. She is also a tenured professor in the college’s Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering with a joint appointment in Computer Science and Engineering. In addition, Dr. Howard is the Founder and Chief Technology Officer of Zyrobotics, a startup that designs AI-powered STEM tools for early childhood education. Dr. Howard previously served as the Linda J. and Mark C. Smith Professor, School of Electrical & Computer Engineering, at Georgia Institute of Technology from August 2015 to February 2021, and Chair of the School of Interactive Computing at Georgia Tech from January 2018 to February 2021. Prior to Georgia Tech, Dr. Howard served as Senior Robotics Researcher and Deputy Manager in the Office of the Chief Scientist with NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory. Dr. Howard serves on the board of Motorola Solutions, Inc. and serves on the advisory boards for numerous robotics and AI-based organizations. Dr. Howard holds a degree from Brown University, an M.S. and Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from the University of Southern California, as well as an M.B.A. from the Drucker Graduate School of Management. Qualifications and Contributions Dr. Howard is independent and her executive, operational, academic, and strategic leadership experience in the technology industry provide her with a deep understanding of Autodesk’s technology and business. Her experience as an entrepreneur and founder and her business degree provide her with the financial acumen necessary to serve on our Audit Committee. | |||||
2023 Proxy Statement | 13
 | Blake Irving | ||||
Age: 63 | Director since 2019 | Independent | |||||
| Autodesk Committees: Corporate Governance and Nominating | |||||
Mr. Irving has over 25 years of executive leadership experience in the technology industry. Mr. Irving served as the Chief Executive Officer of GoDaddy Inc., an Internet domain registrar and web hosting company, from January 2013 to January 2018, and served on the board of directors of GoDaddy from May 2014 to June 2018. From 2010 to 2012, Mr. Irving served as Chief Product Officer of Yahoo! Inc. From 2009 to 2010, Mr. Irving was a Professor in the M.B.A. program at Pepperdine University. From 1992 to 2007, Mr. Irving served in various senior and management roles at Microsoft Corporation, including most recently as Corporate Vice President of Windows Live Platform Group. Mr. Irving has served on the boards of directors of DocuSign, Inc., since August 2018, ZipRecruiter, Inc., since November 2018, and Flowhub, LLC, since January 2020. Qualifications and Contributions Mr. Irving is independent and has more than 25 years of executive operational and strategic leadership experience in the technology industry. Mr. Irving’s experience at GoDaddy, Yahoo!, and Microsoft provides him with a strong understanding of Autodesk’s industry, business, and international operational challenges, and with the executive compensation knowledge necessary to serve on our Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee. | |||||
 | Mary T. McDowell | ||||
Age: 58 | Director since 2010 | Independent | |||||
| Autodesk Committees: Compensation and Human Resources (Chair) | |||||
Ms. McDowell served as the President and Chief Executive Officer of Mitel Networks Corporation, a telecommunications company, from October 2019 to November 2021 and transitioned to serve as Board Chair until November 2022. Previously, Ms. McDowell served as the Chief Executive Officer and member of the board of directors at Polycom, Inc., from September 2016 to July 2018, when the company was acquired by Plantronics, Inc. Prior to Polycom, Ms. McDowell was an Executive Partner at Siris Capital, LLC. She served as Executive Vice President in charge of Nokia’s Mobile Phone unit from July 2010 to July 2012 and as Executive Vice President and Chief Development Officer of Nokia Corporation from January 2008 to July 2010. Previously, Ms. McDowell served as Executive Vice President and General Manager of Enterprise Solutions of Nokia from January 2004 to December 2007. Prior to joining Nokia in 2004, Ms. McDowell spent 17 years in various executive, managerial, and other positions at Compaq Computer Corporation and Hewlett-Packard Company, including serving as Senior Vice President, Industry-Standard Servers of Hewlett-Packard. Ms. McDowell has served as lead director of Informa plc since November 2021, having served as a director of Informa plc since June 2018. Ms. McDowell previously served as Board Chair of Mitel Networks Corporation from November 2021 to November 2022, and as a director of UBM plc from August 2014 to June 2018, and as a director of Bazaarvoice, Inc., from December 2014 to October 2016, and as compensation committee chair of Bazaarvoice, Inc., from 2015 – 2016. Qualifications and Contributions Ms. McDowell is independent and brings to our Board extensive management experience in the technology industry. Her two and a half decades of experience working for global technology companies focused on innovation and collaboration provide her with a firm understanding of Autodesk’s core mission, business, and technology. Her years of service as an executive officer at Polycom, Nokia, and other technology companies, including Hewlett-Packard, provide her with the executive compensation knowledge necessary to serve as Chair of our Compensation and Human Resources Committee. | |||||
14 | AUTODESK, INC.
 | Stephen Milligan | ||||
Age: 59 | Director since 2018 | Independent | |||||
| Autodesk Committees: Audit | |||||
Mr. Milligan served as Chief Executive Officer of Western Digital Corporation, a data storage company, from January 2013 to March 2020, and as its president from March 2012 to October 2015. Previously, Mr. Milligan served as the Chief Financial Officer of Hitachi Global Storage Technologies (“HGST”) from 2007 to 2009, and as HGST’s Chief Executive Officer from 2009 to 2012, when Western Digital acquired HGST. From January 2004 to September 2007, Mr. Milligan served as Western Digital’s Chief Financial Officer after serving in other senior finance roles at Western Digital from September 2002 to January 2004. From April 1997 to September 2002, he held various financial and accounting roles of increasing responsibility at Dell Inc. and was employed at Price Waterhouse for 12 years prior to joining Dell. Mr. Milligan holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Accounting from The Ohio State University. Mr. Milligan has served on the board of directors of Ross Stores, Inc., since January 2015, and served on the board of directors of Western Digital Corporation from January 2013 to May 2020. Qualifications and Contributions Mr. Milligan is independent and has over 30 years of executive operational and financial leadership experience in the technology industry. Mr. Milligan’s experience at Western Digital and HGST, including his finance and executive roles, provides him with a strong understanding of Autodesk’s industry, business, and international operational challenges. His experience as a CFO and CEO provides him with the financial acumen necessary to serve on our Audit Committee. | |||||
 | Lorrie M. Norrington | ||||
Age: 63 | Director since 2011 | Independent | |||||
| Autodesk Committees: Corporate Governance and Nominating (Chair) | |||||
Ms. Norrington has over 40 years of operating experience in technology, software, and internet businesses. She currently serves as an adviser and in an Operating Partner capacity for Lead Edge Capital, a growth equity firm that partners with world-class entrepreneurs and exceptional technology businesses. Ms. Norrington was President of eBay Marketplaces from July 2008 to September 2010 and held a number of senior management roles at eBay from July 2006 to June 2008. Prior to joining eBay, Ms. Norrington was President and CEO of Shopping.com, Inc., from June 2005 to July 2006. Prior to joining Shopping.com, Ms. Norrington served, from August 2001 to January 2005, initially as Executive Vice President of Small Business and later in the office of the CEO, at Intuit Inc. Before Intuit, Ms. Norrington served in a variety of executive positions at General Electric Corporation over a 20-year period, working in a broad range of industries and businesses. Ms. Norrington has served on the boards of directors of Asana, Inc., since September 2019, Colgate-Palmolive since September 2015, and HubSpot since September 2013. Previously, she served on the boards of directors of Eventbrite, Inc., from April 2015 to August 2020, BigCommerce from March 2015 to January 2020, DIRECTV from February 2011 until it was acquired by AT&T in July 2015, Lucasfilm from June 2011 until it was acquired by Disney in December 2012, McAfee, Inc,. from December 2009 until it was acquired by Intel in February 2011, and Shopping.com from November 2004 until it was acquired by eBay in August 2005. Qualifications and Contributions Ms. Norrington is independent, has extensive experience in online commerce SaaS, and valuable management experience in the technology and manufacturing industries. Her four decades of building businesses and adapting to and capitalizing on rapid technological advancement provide Ms. Norrington with a unique perspective. Her executive and board experiences have provided her with the corporate governance skills required to serve on our Board and as Chair of our Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee. | |||||
2023 Proxy Statement | 15
 | Betsy Rafael | ||||
Age: 61 | Director since 2013 | Independent | |||||
| Autodesk Committees: Audit (Chair) | |||||
Ms. Rafael has over 30 years of executive financial experience in the technology industry. Ms. Rafael most recently served as Chief Transformation Officer at GoDaddy Inc., an Internet domain registrar and web hosting company, from May 2018 to November 2019. She served as Principal Accounting Officer of Apple Inc. from January 2008 to October 2012, and as its Vice President and Corporate Controller from August 2007 until October 2012. From April 2002 to September 2006, Ms. Rafael served as Vice President, Corporate Controller and Principal Accounting Officer of Cisco Systems, Inc., and held the position of Vice President, Corporate Finance at Cisco from September 2006 to August 2007. From December 2000 to April 2002, Ms. Rafael was the Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Chief Administrative Officer of Aspect Communications, Inc., a provider of customer relationship portals. From April 2000 to November 2000, Ms. Rafael was Senior Vice President and CFO of Escalate, Inc., an enterprise e-commerce application service provider. From 1994 to 2000, Ms. Rafael held a number of senior positions at Silicon Graphics International Corp. (“SGI”), culminating her career at SGI as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Prior to SGI, Ms. Rafael held senior management positions in finance with Sun Microsystems, Inc., and Apple Computers. Ms. Rafael began her career with Arthur Young & Company. Ms. Rafael has served on the board of directors of Informatica LLC, since July 2021, Proofpoint, Inc., from February 2021 through October 2021, and Kinaxis, Inc., since February 2020. She previously served on the boards of directors of Echelon Corporation from November 2005 to June 2018, GoDaddy Inc. from May 2014 to May 2018, Shutterfly, Inc., from June 2016 to September 2019, and PalmSource, Inc., from April 2004 to November 2005. Qualifications and Contributions Ms. Rafael is independent and has more than 30 years of executive financial experience in the technology industry. Her experience at GoDaddy, Apple, and Cisco, including her finance and executive roles, provides her with a strong understanding of Autodesk’s industry, business, and international operational challenges. Her experience as a principal accounting officer provides her with the financial acumen necessary to serve as the Chair of our Audit Committee. | |||||
 | Rami Rahim | ||||
Age: 52 | Director since 2022 | Independent | |||||
| Autodesk Committees: Compensation and Human Resources | |||||
Rami Rahim has over 25 years’ experience in the technology industry. He serves as Chief Executive Officer of Juniper Networks and is a member of Juniper’s Board of Directors. Mr. Rahim joined Juniper in January 1997 and was appointed as Chief Executive Officer in November 2014. Prior to being appointed to CEO, Mr. Rahim served as Executive Vice President and General Manager of the Juniper Development and Innovation (JDI) organization, overseeing the company's entire product and technology portfolio. Other leadership positions held at Juniper include Executive Vice President and General Manager of Platform Systems Division for routing and switching, Senior Vice President of the Edge and Aggregation Business Unit (EABU) and Vice President and General Manager of EABU. Mr. Rahim earned a Bachelor of Science degree in electrical engineering from the University of Toronto and a Master of Science degree in electrical engineering from Stanford University. Mr. Rahim is a member of IEEE. Qualifications and Contributions Mr. Rahim is independent and has more than 25 years’ experience in the technology industry, and more than 10 years’ experience in leadership positions. His Chief Executive Officer experience at Juniper provides him with cybersecurity experience and a strong understanding of Autodesk’s industry, business, and global and domestic operational challenges. His experience as a CEO provides him with the experience necessary to serve on our Compensation and Human Resources Committee. | |||||
16 | AUTODESK, INC.
Board Leadership Structure
During fiscal year 2023, and since June 2018, Stacy Smith has served as our non-executive Chair of the Board. In his role, Mr. Smith brings his deep understanding of the business to focus on the right strategic opportunities and highlight key risks for the Board’s review. Mr. Smith sets the agenda for each meeting of the Board, in consultation with our CEO, presides at executive sessions, and facilitates communication between the Board, management, and stockholders.
The Board regularly evaluates its leadership structure to ensure that it supports effective independent oversight of Autodesk. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines direct the Board to fill the Chair of the Board and Chief Executive Officer positions after considering a number of factors, including the current size of our business, composition of the Board, current candidates for such positions, and our succession planning goals. Currently, we separate the positions of CEO and non-executive Chair of the Board. In the event the Chair is not an independent director, our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that the Board must elect a Lead Independent Director. Separating the positions of CEO and Chair of the Board allows our President and CEO to focus on our day-to-day business, while allowing the Chair to lead the Board in its fundamental role of providing independent advice to, and oversight of, management. The Board believes that having an independent director serve as Chair is the appropriate leadership structure for Autodesk at this time and demonstrates our commitment to good corporate governance.
In addition, as described below, our Board has three standing committees consisting entirely of independent directors. The Board delegates substantial responsibility to these committees, which report their activities and actions back to the full Board. We believe having independent committees with independent chairs is an important aspect of the leadership structure of our Board.
Stockholder Engagement
Our Board is committed to ensuring that stockholder insights and feedback inform our strong governance practices. We maintain an open dialogue and actively engage with our stockholders to ensure we thoughtfully consider a diversity of perspectives on issues including strategy, financial and business performance, our executive and employee compensation programs, sustainability, workforce diversity, board composition and governance, and a broad range of ESG issues.
The office of our Corporate Secretary coordinates annual stockholder engagement with our Investor Relations team and provides a summary of all relevant feedback to our Board. During fiscal year 2023, members of our management team and, in certain instances, independent members of our Board continued our regular outreach and contacted stockholders representing approximately 51% of Autodesk shares, and provided stockholder feedback to the Board. In addition, throughout the year our Investor Relations team engages with our stockholders, frequently along with Debbie Clifford, our CFO, and in certain instances, Stacy Smith, our Chair.
Fiscal Year 2023 Board Meetings
Each quarter, our Board holds Committee and Board meetings. At each quarterly Board meeting, time is set aside for the independent directors to meet without management present. Additional executive sessions are held as needed. In addition to the quarterly meetings, typically there are other regularly scheduled committee meetings each year.
During fiscal year 2023, the Board held a total of four meetings (including regularly scheduled and special meetings), and its three standing committees (an Audit Committee, a Compensation and Human Resources Committee, and a Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee), held a collective total of seventeen meetings. Each director attended 100% of the total number of meetings of the Board and committees of which he or she was a member during the period he or she served during fiscal year 2023.
Directors are encouraged, but not required, to attend the Annual Meeting of Stockholders. All of our then sitting directors attended the 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
2023 Proxy Statement | 17
The following table sets forth the number of meetings held by our Board and the committees during fiscal year 2023:
| Board | Audit | Compensation and Human Resources | Corporate Governance and Nominating | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of meetings held in fiscal year 2023 | 4 | 9 | 5 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Board Committees
To support effective corporate governance, our Board delegates certain responsibilities to its committees, who report on their activities to the Board. These committees have the authority to engage legal counsel or other advisors or consultants as they deem appropriate to carry out their responsibilities.
The table below provides summary information about each director nominee’s committee membership followed by a summary of each committee’s responsibilities. Each committee has a charter describing its specific responsibilities which can be found on our website at https://investors.autodesk.com/corporate-governance/highlights.
| Name | Independent | Committees | ||||||||||||
| Audit Committee | Compensation and Human Resources Committee | Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee | ||||||||||||
| Andrew Anagnost | ||||||||||||||
| Stacy J. Smith | ü CB | ü | ||||||||||||
| Karen Blasing | ü | ü À | ||||||||||||
| Reid French | ü | ü | ||||||||||||
| Dr. Ayanna Howard | ü | ü | ||||||||||||
| Blake Irving | ü | ü | ||||||||||||
| Mary T. McDowell | ü | C | ||||||||||||
| Stephen Milligan | ü | ü À | ||||||||||||
| Lorrie M. Norrington | ü | C | ||||||||||||
| Betsy Rafael | ü | C À | ||||||||||||
| Rami Rahim | ü | ü | ||||||||||||
CB Non-Executive Chair of Board
C Committee Chair
ü Member
À Financial Expert, as defined in the rules of the SEC
Audit Committee
The Audit Committee oversees Autodesk’s financial statements, compliance with our corporate, accounting, and reporting processes, our system of internal accounting and financial controls, and our management of related risks.
18 | AUTODESK, INC.
The Audit Committee’s responsibilities also include:
•selection, compensation, engagement, retention, termination, and services of our independent registered public accounting firm, including conducting a review of its independence;
•reviewing with management and our independent registered public accounting firm the adequacy of our system of internal financial and disclosure controls;
•reviewing our critical accounting policies and the application of accounting principles;
•reviewing our treasury policies and tax positions;
•overseeing the performance of our internal audit function;
•establishing and overseeing compliance with the procedures for handling complaints regarding accounting, internal accounting controls, or auditing matters, including procedures for confidential, anonymous submission of concerns by employees regarding accounting and auditing matters; and
•overseeing our management of cybersecurity risks relating to financial, accounting, and internal controls matters.
See the Report of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors on page 66 for more information regarding the functions of the Audit Committee.
Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee
Our Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee oversees our corporate governance principles and policies, as well as the process to identify and nominate qualified individuals for Board membership, and Board and committee evaluations.
The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee’s responsibilities include:
•developing general criteria regarding the qualifications and selection of members of the Board;
•determining skills, characteristics, and experiences desired for candidates and overseeing director succession planning;
•recommending candidates for election to the Board;
•developing overall governance guidelines;
•periodically reviewing matters related to our policies and practices concerning environmental, social and governance (“ESG”) initiatives, political contributions and lobbying activities;
•overseeing the performance and evaluation of the Board and individual directors; and
•reviewing and making recommendations regarding director composition and the mandates of Board committees.
Compensation and Human Resources Committee
The Compensation and Human Resources Committee oversees the compensation and benefits for our executive officers, recommends our CEO’s compensation to the independent members of the Board for approval, and grants stock options, RSUs, and PSUs to executive officers and non-executive employees under our stock plans.
As non-employee directors, the members of the Compensation and Human Resources Committee are not eligible to participate in Autodesk’s discretionary employee stock programs. For Fiscal Year 2023, RSUs were granted in June 2022 to all our non-employee directors (except for Mr. Rahim), automatically under the non-discretionary 2012 Outside Director Plan. Starting in August 2022 (including Mr. Rahim’s Fiscal Year 2023 grant), RSUs are granted automatically to non-employee directors pursuant to the Director Compensation Policy and under the 2022 Equity Incentive Plan.
2023 Proxy Statement | 19
The Compensation and Human Resource Committee’s responsibilities also include:
•reviewing and approving the corporate goals and objectives relevant to our CEO and executive officer compensation;
•evaluating CEO and executive officer performance;
•reviewing executive and leadership development policies and practices;
•reviewing succession plans for our CEO and other senior management;
•periodically reviewing matters related to human capital management;
•overseeing matters relating to stockholder approval of executive compensation, including advisory say-on-pay votes; and
•overseeing the management of risks associated with our compensation policies and programs.
See the section titled “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” for a description of our processes and procedures for determining executive compensation. The Compensation and Human Resources Committee may form and delegate authority to subcommittees when appropriate.
Independence of the Board and our Governance Practices
Our Board’s believes independence is a critical component of our governance strategy, and that it’s continued independence enables it to be objective in carrying out its oversight responsibilities. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that a substantial majority of our directors will be independent and that each Committee will be made up of solely independent directors. Autodesk’s independent directors meet regularly in executive session, without management present, as part of the quarterly Board meetings, with the intent to facilitate open discussion. Stacy Smith, our Chair, presides at these executive sessions.
Each year, and before a new director is appointed, the Board must affirmatively determine a director has no relationship that would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out their responsibilities as a director. Annually, each director also completes a detailed questionnaire that provides information about relationships that might affect the determination of independence. Autodesk management provides the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee and the Board with the relevant information from the questionnaires along with known facts and circumstances of any relationship bearing on the independence of a director or nominee. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee then completes an assessment of each director considering all known relevant facts and circumstances concerning any relationship bearing on the independence of a director or nominee. This process includes evaluating whether any identified relationship otherwise adversely affects a director’s independence and affirmatively determining that the director has no material relationship with Autodesk, another director, or as a partner, stockholder, or officer of an organization that has a relationship with Autodesk. As part of its annual review process, our Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee also considers a director’s tenure.
As required by the Nasdaq listing standards, a majority of the members of our Board qualify as “independent.” The Board has determined that, with the exception of Dr. Anagnost, our President and CEO, all of its members are “independent directors” as that term is defined by applicable Nasdaq listing standards. That definition includes a series of objective tests, including that the director is not an employee of the company and has not engaged in various types of business dealings with the company. In addition, as further required by applicable Nasdaq listing standards, the Board has made a subjective determination as to each independent director that no relationships exist that would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director.
Based on the review and recommendation by the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, the Board analyzed the independence of each director. The Board determined that Mses. Blasing, Howard, McDowell, Norrington, and Rafael, and Messrs. French, Irving, Milligan, Rahim and Smith meet the standards of independence under our Corporate Governance Guidelines and the Nasdaq listing standards, including that each member is free of any relationship that would interfere with his or her individual exercise of independent judgment.
20 | AUTODESK, INC.
Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions
Compensation Committee Interlocks
The current members of the Compensation and Human Resources Committee are Mary T. McDowell, Reid French and Rami Rahim. Blake Irving also served on the Compensation and Human Resources Committee during fiscal year 2023. No director who served as a member of the Compensation and Human Resources Committee during fiscal year 2023 is or was formerly an officer or employee of Autodesk or any of its subsidiaries. No interlocking relationship existed between any director who served as a member of the Compensation and Human Resources Committee during fiscal year 2023 and the compensation committee of any other company, nor has any such interlocking relationship existed in the past.
Related Party Transactions
Our Audit Committee has established a written policy and procedures for review and approval of related-party transactions. Autodesk’s Related Party Transactions Policy states that all transactions between Autodesk and its wholly owned subsidiaries and any of its directors, executive officers, nominees for director or owners of 5% or more of our stock, or their immediate family members, where the amount involved exceeds $120,000, require the approval of both our Chief Financial Officer and the Audit Committee. If a related-party transaction subject to review involves directly or indirectly a member of the Audit Committee or the Chief Financial Officer (or one of their immediate family members), such Audit Committee member or Chief Financial Officer will recuse him or herself from the review. The Chief Financial Officer and the Audit Committee shall approve or ratify only those transactions that are deemed to be not inconsistent with the best interests of the Company as a whole. Non-routine transactions with vendors and suppliers of Autodesk and its wholly-owned subsidiaries require the prior written approval of the Chief Accounting Officer.
During fiscal year 2023, there were ordinary course transactions between Autodesk and certain related entities, for example for the purchase of software licenses by companies of which a director is an executive officer or where an executive officer was previously employed. None of these transactions constituted a related-party transaction that required approval by the Audit Committee.
Director Orientation and Continuing Education
Our orientation programs are designed to familiarize new directors with our businesses, strategies, and policies and assist new directors in developing knowledge about Autodesk and the industry to optimize their service on the Board.
Regular continuing education programs enhance directors’ skills and knowledge to perform their responsibilities. These programs may include internally developed programs or programs presented by third parties.
Director Stock Ownership Policy
To align the interests of our directors and stockholders, our directors are required to own Autodesk shares equal in value to at least five times the base annual cash retainer payable to a director. Each of our directors complied with our stock ownership policy in fiscal year 2023.
Outside Board Memberships
We have a highly experienced and engaged Board of Directors. We value the diverse perspectives that our directors’ outside board memberships bring to our boardroom. Directors who serve on other public company boards offer advice and insights regarding the dynamics and operation of a board of directors, the relationship of a board with senior management, and oversight of a changing mix of strategic, operational, and compliance-related matters.
2023 Proxy Statement | 21
In order to ensure sufficient time and attention to meet the responsibilities of Board membership, our Corporate Governance Guidelines state that directors shall serve on no more than four boards of directors of publicly traded companies, including this Board, without consent of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee. Per our Corporate Governance Guidelines, directors advise the Chair of the Board or the Lead Independent Director, as applicable, and the Chair of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee before accepting an invitation to serve on an additional for-profit corporate board. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee reviews the composition of the Board, including matters such as other board commitments, on an annual basis in the context of recommending a slate of directors for stockholder approval.
Director Selection, Qualifications, and Evaluations
Our stockholders elect our Board of Directors annually. In making its annual director nominations determination, the Board’s objective is to recommend a group of directors that can best ensure the continuing success of our business and represent stockholder interests through the exercise of sound judgment using its diversity of experience and perspectives.
The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee recommends to the Board candidates for election and membership criteria for Board nominations. As part of this process, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee works with the Board to determine the skills, characteristics, and experiences desired for potential candidates, taking into account the current composition and size of the Board and recent Board, committee, and individual director evaluations, among other considerations. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee retains any search firm involved in identifying potential candidates and approves their fees.
In its evaluation of director candidates, including the members of the Board eligible for re-election, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee seeks to achieve a balance of knowledge, experience, and skills on the Board. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee considers many factors, including integrity, judgment, diversity (including gender, sexual orientation, age, and ethnicity), expertise, business experience, length of service, independence, and other commitments, as well as any relationships between directors and Autodesk’s customers and suppliers.
This Proxy Statement includes a table summarizing the key qualifications, skills, and attributes currently most relevant to the decision to nominate candidates to serve on the Board. As the Board strives to maintain a diverse set of skills and attributes, it also expects that each member will be able to understand and contribute meaningfully to the oversight of the range of material business, risk, and regulatory issues the Company faces. Management’s responsibility includes educating and communicating to the Board in a way that enables effective oversight of this broad set of issues. When searching for new directors, the Board endeavors to actively seek out highly qualified women and individuals from underrepresented communities to include in the pool from which nominees are chosen. We aim to create a Board with diverse experiences and backgrounds to provide our complex, global company with thoughtful and engaged oversight. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee assesses the effectiveness of its diversity efforts through periodic evaluations of the Board’s composition.
While we have not established specific minimum qualifications for director candidates, the Board believes that nominees must reflect a Board that comprises directors who are predominantly independent, have high integrity, possess broad knowledge and experience at the policy-making level in business or technology, including an understanding of the software industry and Autodesk's business in particular, be able to increase overall Board effectiveness, and have varied and divergent experiences, viewpoints, and backgrounds.
When the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee recruits new director candidates, that process typically involves either a search firm or a member of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee contacting a prospect to assess interest and availability. A candidate will then meet with members of the Board and Mr. Anagnost, and then meet with members of management as appropriate. At the same time, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee and the search firm will contact references for the candidate. A background check is completed before a final candidate recommendation is made to the Board.
Stockholders have previously elected all Board nominees, except Mr. Rahim, who was appointed in August 2022. In recruiting Mr. Rahim, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee retained a search firm to help identify director prospects, perform candidate outreach, assist in reference checks, and provide other related services.
22 | AUTODESK, INC.
Stockholder Recommendations and Nominations of Director Candidates
It is the policy of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee to consider recommendations for candidates from stockholders. Stockholder recommendations for candidates to the Board must be directed in writing to Autodesk, Inc., One Market Street, Ste. 400, San Francisco, California 94105, Attention: Corporate Secretary, and must include the candidate’s name, home and business contact information, detailed biographical data and qualifications, information regarding any relationships between the candidate and Autodesk within the last three years, and evidence that the nominating person owns Autodesk stock.
In addition, our Bylaws provide for proxy access nominations of director candidates by eligible stockholders. Stockholders who wish to nominate directors for inclusion in our proxy materials or directly at an annual meeting of stockholders in accordance with the procedures in our Bylaws should follow the instructions under “Questions and Answers About the 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and Procedural Matters.” Appropriately nominated proxy access candidates or candidates who comply with both our Bylaws and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) Rule 14a-19 will be included in the proxy statement and ballot.
Corporate Governance Guidelines
We believe the highest standards of corporate governance and business conduct are essential to running our business efficiently, serving our stockholders well, and maintaining our integrity in the marketplace. Over the years, we have devoted substantial attention to the subject of corporate governance and have developed Corporate Governance Guidelines, which set forth the principles that guide our Board in overseeing corporate governance, maintaining its independence, evaluating its own performance and the performance of our executive officers, and setting corporate strategy. The Board reviews our governance practices, corporate governance developments, and stockholder feedback on a regular basis to ensure continued effectiveness. The Board first adopted the Corporate Governance Guidelines in December 1995 and has refined them periodically since. The Corporate Governance Guidelines are available on our website at https://investors.autodesk.com/corporate-governance/highlights.
Code of Business Conduct and Code of Ethics
In addition, we have had a longstanding Code of Business Conduct for our directors and employees as well as a Code of Ethics for Senior Executive and Financial Officers, including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer, all senior vice presidents, and all individuals reporting to our principal financial officer, to ensure that our business is conducted in a consistently legal and ethical manner. These codes are reviewed periodically and updated as appropriate. Our current Code of Business Conduct and Code of Ethics for Senior Executive and Financial Officers are available on our website at https://investors.autodesk.com/corporate-governance/highlights. We will post in the Investor Relations section of our website any amendment to our Code of Business Conduct or Code of Ethics for Senior Executive and Financial Officers, as well as any waivers of these Codes that are required to be disclosed by the rules of the SEC or the Nasdaq.
Risk Oversight
Our Board, as a whole and through its committees, is responsible for the oversight of risk management. Senior management is responsible for the day-to-day management of the material risks Autodesk faces. In its oversight role, our Board must satisfy itself that the risk management processes designed and implemented by management are adequate and functioning as designed. The involvement of the full Board in setting our business strategy at least annually is a key part of its oversight of risk management, its consideration of management’s appetite for risk, and its determination of what constitutes an appropriate level of risk. The full Board receives regular updates from our senior management and outside advisers regarding certain risks Autodesk faces, including litigation, cybersecurity, data privacy, corporate governance, and various operating risks.
2023 Proxy Statement | 23
In addition, while our Board is responsible for monitoring and assessing strategic risk exposure, our committees are charged with specific areas of risk oversight, as summarized below:
•Audit Committee. Our Audit Committee is responsible for overseeing the management of risks associated with Autodesk’s financial reporting, accounting, and auditing matters, as well as cybersecurity risks relating to financial, accounting, and internal controls matters.
•Compensation and Human Resources Committee. Our Compensation and Human Resources Committee oversees our executive officer succession planning and risks associated with our compensation policies and programs.
•Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee. Our Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee oversees the management of risks associated with director independence, conflicts of interest, composition and organization of our Board, and director succession planning. Board committees report their findings to the full Board.
Senior management attend all meetings of the Board and its standing committees and are available to address any questions or concerns raised by the Board regarding risk management and any other matters. The Board holds annual strategic planning sessions with senior management to discuss strategies, key challenges, and risks and opportunities for Autodesk.
Executive Succession Planning and Leadership Development
The Board believes one component of our long-term success is planning for CEO succession and overseeing the development and succession of other members of our executive leadership team. The Board and our Compensation Committee work together with our CEO and our Chief Human Resources Officer to develop a succession plan. In developing the plan, they consider Autodesk’s current and future business strategies, organizational needs, competitive challenges, individual leadership and management potential and development and emergency situations.
Board Evaluations
The Board is committed to a robust and constructive evaluation process as an essential part of good corporate governance and Board effectiveness. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee annually evaluates the performance of the Board. In fiscal year 2023, this evaluation process included using the services of third-party corporate governance experts to assist with the evaluation questionnaires. The results were reported to and discussed with the Board. The report includes an assessment of the Board’s compliance with certain principles found in the Corporate Governance Guidelines and identifies areas in which the Board could enhance its performance.
The annual evaluation process is designed to elicit feedback on the processes, structure, composition, and effectiveness of the Board and its committees. Furthermore, it assesses individual director performance and contribution levels. The evaluation results have led to strategic changes to increase Board effectiveness, including providing clarity on key areas for the Board’s focus over the coming year, input on Board composition and recruiting, and information on how to best operationalize Board and committee meetings.
In addition, each committee annually evaluates its performance and reports the results to the Board. In fiscal year 2023 the evaluation of each committee included an assessment of the committee’s compliance with the principles in its charter, and identified areas in which the committee could enhance its performance.
24 | AUTODESK, INC.
Contacting the Board
Communications from stockholders to the Board, or specific members of the Board, should be addressed to the Chair of the Board using one of the below methods. All such communications will be initially received and processed by the office of our Corporate Secretary.
| + | Autodesk, Inc., c/o Chief Legal Officer, One Market Street, Ste. 400, San Francisco, California 94105, Attention: Non-Executive Chair | : | board-administrator@autodesk.com | ||||||||
2023 Proxy Statement | 25
Executive Compensation
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Throughout this proxy statement, the individuals included in the Summary Compensation Table beginning on page 44 are referred to as our “named executive officers” or “NEOs.” For fiscal year 2023, our NEOs were:
•Andrew Anagnost, Chief Executive Officer and President;
•Deborah L. Clifford, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer;
•Steven M. Blum, Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer;
•Ruth Ann Keene, Executive Vice President, Corporate Affairs, Chief Legal Officer and Corporate Secretary;
•Rebecca Pearce, Executive Vice President and Chief People Officer; and
•Pascal W. Di Fronzo, Former Executive Vice President, Corporate Affairs, Chief Legal Officer and Corporate Secretary.
The information in this discussion provides perspective and narrative analysis relating to, and should be read along with, the executive compensation tables beginning on page 44.
Our Compensation Discussion and Analysis provides an overview of our business performance in fiscal year 2023, highlights the key components and structure of our executive compensation program, discusses the principles underlying our compensation policies and practices, and addresses other matters we believe explain and demonstrate our performance-based compensation philosophy.
Management Changes in Fiscal Year 2023
Ms. Rebecca Pearce was promoted to Chief People Officer effective January 4, 2022, and we intend to enter into a confirmatory employment letter with Ms. Pearce which will confirm the terms and conditions of her continued employment in this position. After Mr. Pascal W. Di Fronzo retired on May 9, 2022, Ms. Ruth Ann Keene was appointed as the Chief Legal Officer in May 2022.
Executive Summary
Fiscal Year 2023 Strategic Priorities and Performance Highlights
Autodesk empowers innovators to achieve the new possible, delivering technology that enables our customers to achieve better outcomes for their products, businesses, and the world. In fiscal year 2023, we delivered record revenue, cash flow from operating activities, and free cash flow.
We achieved strong financial and competitive performance in fiscal 2023 despite macroeconomic, policy, geopolitical and pandemic related headwinds. Several factors contributed to our performance, including robust renewal rates, strong growth in subscriptions, rapidly expanding digital sales, and the upcoming transition from up-front to annual billings for multi-year contracts. A large renewal cohort provided an additional tailwind to billings and free cash flow.
Enduring strengths underpinned our results. Resilience was derived from our subscription business model and geographic, product, and customer diversification. Cloud-based platforms and services represent an expanding market opportunity as customers adopt our next-generation technology and services to enable transformation within and between the industries we serve. Finally, disciplined and focused capital deployment through the economic cycle enables Autodesk to remain sufficiently well invested to realize the significant benefits of its strategy while mitigating the risk of having to make expensive catch-up investments in the future.
While macroeconomic, policy, and geopolitical uncertainty have considerable human and economic impacts, in many ways these impacts have reinforced the structural growth drivers underpinning our strategy and accelerated
26 | AUTODESK, INC.
the pace of change. This has increased our confidence in our strategy to transform the industries we serve with end-to-end, cloud-based solutions that enable our customers to drive efficiency and sustainability through increased workflow convergence, platform standardization, automation, and distributed working.
We can see the fruits of that opportunity already. We signed our largest-ever Enterprise Business Agreement (“EBA”) in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2023, encompassing more personas and connecting more workflows in the cloud to drive efficiency and sustainability.
Empowering innovators with design-and-make technology to achieve the new possible enables them to build and manufacture efficiently and sustainably. We continue to execute well in challenging times and look forward to the years ahead with excitement and optimism.
| TOTAL REVENUE | INCOME FROM OPERATIONS | NON-GAAP INCOME FROM OPERATIONS (1) | ||||||||||||
| 14% from fiscal year 2022 | 60% from fiscal year 2022 | 28% from fiscal year 2022 | ||||||||||||
| $5.01B | $989M | $1.79B | ||||||||||||
| CASH FLOW FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES | FREE CASH FLOW (1) | 5-Y TOTAL SHAREHOLDER RETURN | ||||||||||||
| 35% from fiscal year 2022 | 37% from fiscal year 2022 | 86% from fiscal year 2018 | ||||||||||||
| $2.07B | $2.03B | 86% | ||||||||||||
_____________________________
(1) A reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP results is provided in Appendix A.
Fiscal Year 2023 Executive Compensation Highlights
Pay Decisions based on Performance Results The Compensation and Human Resources Committee (the “Committee”) believes that total compensation for our named executive officers should closely align with performance. In fiscal year 2023, we used the following performance metrics to determine the performance-based pay outcomes for the NEOs:
| Incentive Program | Performance Metrics | ||||
| Executive Incentive Plan (EIP) or Bonus to Equity Exchange Program | Total Revenue Non-GAAP Income from Operations | ||||
| Long-Term Incentives — Performance Share Units (PSU) | Total Revenue Free Cash Flow Relative TSR (as defined below) (over 1, 2, and 3 years) | ||||
In March 2023, the Committee made the following determinations relating to the compensation of our NEOs based on Company’s performance against the pre-determined goals. The Committee did not make any discretionary adjustments to the incentive payouts.
2023 Proxy Statement | 27
Fiscal Year 2023 Executive Incentive Plan Results; or Bonus to Equity Exchange Program Results | All NEOs elected to receive Performance Share Units (“PSUs”) in lieu of cash-based Executive Incentive Plan (“EIP”) award in fiscal year 2023. Consistent with our fiscal year 2023 financial results, the Committee determined that, based on attainment of the performance metrics for Autodesk’s 2023 EIP, the PSUs would vest at 94.9% for our CEO and other NEOs at the end of fiscal year 2023. | ||||
| Performance Share Unit Results | For each award, the Committee measured performance based on Autodesk’s achievement of 96.1% of the total revenue and free cash flow targets established for fiscal year 2023 and relative total stockholder return (“TSR”) over one-, two-, and three-year performance periods, respectively. The Committee certified the attainment levels for performance measures for tranches of PSUs awarded in April 2022, April 2021, and April 2020. | ||||
Emphasis on Variable “At Risk” Performance-Based Executive Compensation
Our executive compensation program emphasizes variable compensation with both annual and long-term performance components. In fiscal year 2023, our CEO elected to forego his annual cash incentive award and receive performance share units instead, as eligible under the Bonus to Equity Exchange Program. As a result, 59% of our CEO’s total compensation in fiscal year 2023 consisted of performance-based equity awards. In total 95% of our CEO’s compensation was variable and linked to our financial and stock performance. In fiscal year 2023, our other NEOs also elected to participate in the bonus to equity exchange program. As a result, 57% of other NEOs’ total compensation in fiscal year 2023 consisted of performance-based equity awards. In total 90% of other NEOs’ total compensation was variable in nature and “at risk”. Our incentive programs reward strong annual financial and operational performance, as well as relative TSR over one-, two-, and three-year performance periods. The charts below illustrate the fiscal year 2023 pay mix between base salary and targeted short- and long-term equity compensation for our CEO and all other NEOs.
Additionally, to drive the achievement of our key strategic Environmental, Social, and Governance (“ESG”) priorities around diversity, inclusion, belonging, environmental sustainability, and philanthropy, our executive compensation program allows for the CEO to recommend to the Committee adjustments to awards for the other NEOs based on ESG performance. Given that long-term incentive awards are the largest component of NEO compensation, ESG adjustments will generally focus on equity grants. The Committee will take into account the CEO’s recommendations when determining the final awards for the other NEOs, and will also consider the overall company progress and outcomes on ESG when it determines long-term incentive awards for the CEO.
Say-on-Pay Results and Stockholder Outreach
Autodesk and the Committee value the input of our stockholders. The Committee carefully considers stockholder feedback as part of its ongoing review of our executive compensation programs, design, and metrics, and this feedback has informed changes the Committee has made in recent years to align our programs with our business transformation. At the 2022 Annual Meeting, 92.4% of the votes cast on our say-on-pay proposal were favorable, reflecting strong stockholder support for our executive compensation programs. In fiscal year 2023, members of our management team and, in certain instances, independent members of our Board continued our regular outreach and contacted stockholders representing approximately 51% of our outstanding shares. Our management team,
28 | AUTODESK, INC.
and in some cases our independent Chair, met with representatives from active and passive funds to discuss strategy, our executive and employee compensation programs, workforce diversity, board composition and skill sets, sustainability, and a broad range of other ESG issues. This outreach enabled us to gather feedback from a significant cross-section of Autodesk’s stockholder base. Based on these discussions, the Committee found that our stockholders continued to be supportive of our executive compensation programs and the alignment between executive pay and Autodesk’s performance. Additionally, our stockholders did not request any pay related changes, which supported our decision to maintain the overall design of our executive compensation program.
Compensation Guiding Principles
The Committee believes that Autodesk’s executive compensation program should be designed to attract, motivate, and retain talented executives and should provide a rigorous framework that is tied to stockholder returns, company performance, long-term strategic corporate goals, and individual performance. The general compensation objectives are to:
•Recruit and retain the highest caliber of executives through competitive rewards;
•Motivate executive officers to achieve business and financial goals;
•Balance rewards for short- and long-term performance; and
•Align rewards with stockholder value creation.
Within this framework, the total compensation for each executive officer varies based on multiple dimensions:
•Whether Autodesk achieves its short-term and long-term financial and non-financial objectives;
•Autodesk’s TSR relative to companies in the North American Technology Software Index;
•The specific roles and responsibilities of the officer;
•Each individual officer’s skills, capabilities, contributions, and performance;
•Internal pay alignment considerations; and
•Retention considerations.
Leading Compensation Governance Practices
Autodesk’s executive compensation objectives are supported by policies and strong governance practices that align executives’ interests with the interests of our stockholders. Some of the program’s most notable features are highlighted in the table and summarized below.
| What We Do | What We Do Not Do | |||||||||||||
| a | Engage in robust stockholder outreach | x | Allow hedging, pledging, or trading in Autodesk derivative securities | |||||||||||
| a | Tie a significant percentage of NEO total pay to achievement of critical financial and stockholder value creation | x | Reprice stock options | |||||||||||
| a | Employ maximum payouts on performance-based cash and equity incentive compensation | x | Offer executive benefits and excessive perquisites | |||||||||||
| a | Require significant stock ownership requirements | x | Use fixed-term employment agreements | |||||||||||
| a | Include a clawback policy in incentive programs | |||||||||||||
| a | Provide double-trigger change in control arrangements with no excise tax gross-up | |||||||||||||
| a | Ensure effective risk management | |||||||||||||
| a | Rely on an independent compensation committee and engage an independent compensation consultant | |||||||||||||
2023 Proxy Statement | 29
The Compensation-Setting Process
The Committee reviews and approves all components of each executive officer’s compensation.
CEO Pay Decisions
Throughout the year, the Committee and other independent members of the Board, including the Chair, review the performance of, and provide feedback to, our CEO at regularly scheduled meetings and through informal discussions. Annually, the Committee meets and discusses with other independent members of the Board the performance of our CEO in light of corporate goals and objectives. The Committee, without the CEO in attendance, took this assessment into account, along with competitive compensation data, in determining our CEO’s compensation. Performance targets are intended to be aggressive yet achievable with diligent effort during the fiscal year. As part of its deliberations on CEO compensation, the Committee consulted with its independent consultant and the other independent directors prior to approving our CEO’s compensation.
Executive Officer Pay Decisions
Our CEO makes recommendations to the Committee regarding the base salary, annual cash incentive awards (EIP), and equity awards for each executive officer other than himself. These recommendations are based on our CEO’s assessment of each executive officer’s performance during the year, competitive compensation data, internal pay alignment, and retention considerations. Our CEO reports on the performance of the executive officers and their business functions during the year in light of corporate goals and objectives. He bases his evaluation on his knowledge of each executive officer’s performance and input from other individuals, including feedback provided by the executive officers, their colleagues, and their direct reports. Members of our People and Places organization assist our CEO in assessing each executive officer’s performance and providing market compensation data for each role. In executing the responsibilities set forth in its charter, the Committee relies on a number of resources to provide input to the decision-making process.
Independent Consultant
The Committee retained Exequity LLP as its compensation adviser for fiscal year 2023. Exequity provided advice and recommendations on a number of issues, including total compensation philosophy; program design, including program goals, components, and metrics; peer data; compensation trends in the technology sector and general market for senior executives; separation plans; the compensation of our CEO and our other executive officers; and disclosure of our executive pay programs. The Committee has considered the independence of Exequity in light of Nasdaq's listing standards for compensation committee independence and the rules of the SEC, and requested and received a written confirmation from Exequity addressing the independence of the firm and its senior advisers working with the Committee. The Committee discussed these considerations and concluded that the work performed by Exequity did not raise any conflict of interest.
Management
The Committee also consults with management and Autodesk’s People and Places organization regarding executive and non-executive employee compensation plans, including administration of Autodesk’s equity incentive plans.
30 | AUTODESK, INC.
Competitive Compensation Positioning and Peer Group
To ensure our executive compensation practices are competitive and consistent with the Committee’s guiding principles, Exequity and management provide the Committee with compensation data for each executive role. This data is drawn from a group of companies in relevant industries that compete with Autodesk for executive talent. The Committee uses this data, as well as information about broader technology industry compensation practices, when evaluating the compensation of our executive officers.
The compensation peer group is selected based upon multiple criteria, including industry positioning, competition for talent, revenue, market capitalization, financial results, and geographic footprint. The Committee reviews the compensation peer group each year to ensure that the comparisons remain meaningful and relevant. Based on the Committee’s review in September 2021, Nuance Communications, Inc., was removed from the compensation peer group as it was acquired by Microsoft. DocuSign, Inc. and Fortinet, Inc., were added to the peer group based on the criteria described above. The fiscal year 2023 compensation peer group consisted of the following companies:
| Company | Revenue for the Most Recent Completed Fiscal Year (in billions) | Market Capitalization as of 1/31/2023 (in billions) | ||||||||||||
| Adobe Inc. | 17.61 | 171.10 | ||||||||||||
| Akamai Technologies, Inc. | 3.62 | 13.92 | ||||||||||||
| ANSYS, Inc. | 2.07 | 23.16 | ||||||||||||
| Block, Inc. (formerly Square, Inc.) | 17.53 | 49.04 | ||||||||||||
| Cadence Design Systems, Inc. | 3.56 | 49.85 | ||||||||||||
| Citrix Systems, Inc. | 3.22 | N/A (1) | ||||||||||||
| DocuSign, Inc. | 2.52 | 12.24 | ||||||||||||
| Electronic Arts Inc. | 6.99 | 35.40 | ||||||||||||
| Fortinet, Inc. | 4.42 | 40.90 | ||||||||||||
| Gen Digital (formerly NortonLifeLock Inc.) | 2.80 | 14.70 | ||||||||||||
| Intuit Inc. | 12.73 | 118.63 | ||||||||||||
| NetApp, Inc. | 6.32 | 14.17 | ||||||||||||
| Palo Alto Networks, Inc. | 5.50 | 47.97 | ||||||||||||
| PTC Inc. | 1.93 | 15.94 | ||||||||||||
| Salesforce.com, Inc. | 31.35 | 164.78 | ||||||||||||
| ServiceNow, Inc. | 7.25 | 92.34 | ||||||||||||
| Splunk Inc. | 3.65 | 15.79 | ||||||||||||
| Synopsys, Inc. | 5.08 | 53.90 | ||||||||||||
| Workday, Inc. | 6.22 | 46.81 | ||||||||||||
| Autodesk, Inc. | 5.01 | 46.26 | ||||||||||||
| Autodesk Percentile Ranking | 47% | 50% | ||||||||||||
(1) Citrix Systems was acquired in September 2022.
In September 2022, the Committee reviewed the compensation peer group that would be used for fiscal year 2024 compensation decision making. The Committee determined that for fiscal year 2024, the fiscal year 2023 peer group would still be appropriate to use for compensation benchmarking purposes; therefore, no changes were made to the peer group.
When determining the base salary, incentive targets, equity grants, and target total direct compensation opportunity for each of our NEOs, the Committee references the median data from our compensation peer group for each component and in the aggregate. Actual compensation awards may be above or below the median levels, depending on Autodesk’s financial and operational performance and each executive officer’s experience, skills, and performance. The Committee believes that referencing the total compensation packages of the companies in the compensation peer group keeps Autodesk’s compensation competitive and within market norms. This also provides flexibility for variances in compensation where appropriate, based on each executive officer’s leadership, contributions, and particular skills or expertise as well as retention considerations.
2023 Proxy Statement | 31
Principal Elements of the Executive Compensation Program
The principal elements of Autodesk’s fiscal year 2023 executive compensation program for the CEO and other NEOs are described below.
| Component | Purpose | Description | Performance Measures | |||||||||||||||||
Base Salary  | Forms basis for competitive compensation package | Reflects competitive market conditions, individual performance, and internal alignment | The Committee considers individual performance when setting and reviewing base salary levels and merit increases | |||||||||||||||||
Executive Incentive Plan (“EIP”) or Bonus to Equity Exchange Program  | Motivate achievement of annual strategic priorities relating to top- and bottom-line growth For Exchange Program participants: provide flexibility to align with individual preference, and align further with stockholder interests | Target percentage based on competitive market practices and internal alignment Actual bonus or PSU payout ranges from 0% to 200% of target and is determined by performance versus goals established at the beginning of the performance period | Total revenue Non-GAAP income from operations | |||||||||||||||||
Long-Term Incentives —Performance Stock Units (“PSU”)  | Align compensation with key drivers of the business and relative stockholder return Encourage focus on near-term and long-term strategic objectives | Size of award based on competitive market practices, corporate and individual performance, and internal alignment Actual number of shares vested ranges from 0% to 200% of target and is determined by performance versus goals established at the beginning of the performance period | Total revenue Free cash flow Autodesk’s relative TSR over one-, two-, and three-year performance periods Autodesk stock price | |||||||||||||||||
Long-Term Incentives — Restricted Stock Units (“RSU”)  | Encourage focus on long-term stockholder value creation Retention | Size of award based on competitive market practices, corporate and individual performance, internal alignment, and retention considerations Recipients earn shares if they remain employed through the three-year vesting period | Autodesk stock price | |||||||||||||||||
When setting the goals for the annual cash incentive opportunity and PSUs, the Committee considered the overlap of total revenue to be appropriate as a key metric to Autodesk’s success, both in the short-term and long-term timeframes. The use of non-GAAP income from operations in our annual cash incentive (and corresponding bonus to equity exchange program) and free cash flow as well as relative TSR over one-, two-, and three-year performance periods against market indices as a modifier for the PSUs further differentiates the short- and long-term incentives and aligns those awards with the achievement of Autodesk’s strategic goals and the long-term interests of our stockholders.
32 | AUTODESK, INC.
Base Salary
Base salary is used to provide our executive officers with a competitive amount of fixed annual cash compensation. The Committee views base salary as a reliable source of income for the executive officers and an important recruiting and retention tool. The Committee sets base salaries at a competitive level that recognizes the scope, responsibility, and skills required of each position, as well as market conditions and internal pay alignment.
As part of the annual review of target compensation opportunities, the Committee reviewed a benchmarking analysis of the base salary for each executive role, an assessment of each executive officer’s experience, skills, responsibilities, and performance level, and Autodesk’s performance. For fiscal year 2023, after taking account of the above considerations, the Committee approved a base salary of $1,040,000 for Dr. Anagnost, and $625,000 for Ms. Clifford. Mr. Blum’s base salary is $700,000 effective February 1, 2022 in connection with his promotion to Chief Operating Officer and in recognition of his increased responsibilities. The Committee, evaluating the considerations above, set Ms. Keene’s base salary at $530,000 in connection with her appointment as Chief Legal Officer and set Rebecca Pearce’s base salary at GBP 310,000 in connection with her promotion to Chief People Officer.
| Named Executive Officer | Fiscal Year 2022 Base Salary | Fiscal Year 2023 Base Salary | % Change Compared to Prior Fiscal Year | |||||||||||||||||
| Andrew Anagnost | $1,000,000 | $1,040,000 | 4 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Deborah L. Clifford | $600,000 | $625,000 | 4 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Steven M. Blum | $615,000 | $700,000 | 14 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Ruth Ann Keene (1) | $— | $530,000 | N/A | |||||||||||||||||
Rebecca Pearce (1) (2) | $— | $381,300 | N/A | |||||||||||||||||
| Former Executive Officer | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Pascal W. Di Fronzo | $514,500 | $514,500 | — | % | ||||||||||||||||
_____________
(1) Mses. Keene and Pearce were not named executive officers during fiscal 2022.
(2) Ms. Pearce’s base salary is paid in British Pounds. This amount represents the approximate dollar value of her base salary converted to U.S. dollars using the British Pound to dollar exchange rate of 1.23, which represents an average for fiscal year 2023.
Annual Short-Term Incentive Compensation
At the beginning of each fiscal year, the Committee establishes target award opportunities, payout metrics, and performance targets for the Autodesk, Inc., Executive Incentive Plan (“EIP”). This annual cash incentive is intended to motivate and reward participants for achieving company-wide annual financial and non-financial objectives as well as individual objectives.
Target Award Opportunities and Fiscal Year 2023 Executive Incentive Plan
The Committee sets the target annual cash incentive award opportunity for each eligible executive officer based on competitive assessments, the executive’s particular role, and internal alignment considerations. Based on its review of these factors, the Committee set the fiscal year 2023 cash incentive target for each of our NEOs, except for the CEO, at the same percentage as in fiscal year 2022. These target opportunities are expressed as a percentage of the NEO’s annual base salary. CEO’s target annual incentive opportunity was increased from 125% to 150% of his annual base salary, effective April 1, 2022. Other NEOs’ target opportunities remained at 75% of their annual base salaries. An NEO may receive an earned award that is greater or less than the target award opportunity, depending upon Autodesk’s and the NEO’s performance.
In fiscal year 2023, bonus awards for each of our NEOs were funded under the EIP or bonus to equity exchange program, if elected. At the beginning of the fiscal year, the Committee established funding performance thresholds, which, if achieved, would establish the maximum fiscal year 2023 EIP funding at 200% of target. For fiscal year 2023, the Committee selected total revenue, non-GAAP income from operations, and absolute TSR as the funding metrics. Autodesk’s fiscal year 2023 performance exceeded the funding threshold, resulting in the maximum bonus award funding for each executive. The Committee then exercised its negative discretion to reduce the actual bonus award for each of the participants based on pre-established performance measures, as described below.
2023 Proxy Statement | 33
Bonus to Equity Exchange Program
For fiscal year 2023, we offered a bonus to equity exchange program to certain employees, including our NEOs. The program provides executives with the option to receive PSUs in lieu of participation in the fiscal year 2023 EIP. Under this program, our NEOs were offered an election for a PSU award with a grant value equal to 100% of the target payout of the fiscal year 2023 EIP award they would have otherwise been eligible to receive. The PSUs would vest in one year, contingent upon attainment of the same funding and performance metrics as the fiscal year 2023 EIP. The final number of shares received could range from 0% to 200% of target. All of our NEOs as of January 31, 2022, elected to participate in the bonus to equity exchange program in fiscal year 2023, including those who were promoted during the year who made the election prior to their promotion. Fiscal year 2023 was the last year we provided the bonus to equity exchange program to eligible employees after piloting it for two consecutive years. Upon discontinuing of the program, even without the PSUs granted via the bonus to equity exchange program, all NEOs will still have approximately 80% to 90% of their target total direct compensation weighted on long-term incentive equity awards.
Company Performance Measures and Performance
At the beginning of fiscal year 2023, the Committee approved fiscal year 2023 EIP performance measures to align our CEO’s and other NEOs’ bonus opportunities with our strategic priorities and key drivers of success. In connection with the uncertain economic conditions resulting from the war in Ukraine, including the discontinuation of revenue from Russia, the Committee updated the EIP performance targets in May 2022 to reflect the Company’s fiscal year 2023 financial plan by adjusting the performance targets downward. This adjustment did not result in a material modification of the PSU awards that executives received in lieu of cash incentives, nor did it result in recognition of incremental grant date fair value on our consolidated financial statements. The updated total revenue and non-GAAP income from operations performance targets were 17% and 31% above last year’s actual performance achievement, respectively. In its exercise of negative discretion, the Committee considered the performance attained versus the pre-established performance targets to determine payouts. For our CEO and other NEOs, the Committee assessed the performance of Autodesk against targets set in May 2022 based on the criteria below; the final award could range from 0% to 200% of the target award. This calculation yielded a bonus payout of 94.9% of target, as shown below:
| Performance Metric (1) | Weighting | Actual (millions) | Target (millions) | Performance Attainment % | Funding | Weighted EIP Funding % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total Revenue | 60% | $5,005 | $5,065 | 98.8% | 94.1% | 56.5% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Non-GAAP Income from Operations | 40% | $1,785 | $1,821 | 98.0% | 96.1% | 38.4% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | 100% | 94.9% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
_________________
(1)The fiscal 2023 total revenue and non-GAAP income from operations results were not adjusted for acquired entities.
34 | AUTODESK, INC.
At the end of fiscal year 2022, all NEOs elected to participate in the bonus to equity exchange program, including those who were promoted during the year who made the election prior to their promotion. At the beginning of fiscal year 2023, they were granted a number of PSUs in lieu of the opportunity of receiving cash EIP. The grant value of these PSU awards was calculated based on base salaries and short-term incentive target percentages effective as of February 1, 2022. The number of PSUs were calculated using the target EIP amount divided by 20-day average stock price as of the grant date. In March 2023, based on the level of achievement of the EIP program performance objectives, the Committee approved the PSU payout for the exchange program participants, as shown below:
| Named Executive Officer | Short-Term Incentive Target as a Percentage of Base Salary | Short-Term Incentive Target | Target PSUs Granted in lieu of Target Cash Incentives | PSUs Payout as a % of Target | PSUs Vested (1) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Andrew Anagnost | 125% | $1,250,000 | 5,952 | 94.9% | 5,648 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deborah L. Clifford | 75% | $450,000 | 2,142 | 94.9% | 2,032 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Steven M. Blum | 75% | $525,000 | 2,499 | 94.9% | 2,371 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Ruth Ann Keene | 75% | $397,500 | 1,892 | 94.9% | 1,795 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rebecca Pearce | 75% | $271,350 | 1,292 | 94.9% | 1,226 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Former Executive Officer | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pascal W. Di Fronzo (2) | N/A | $— | — | —% | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
_________________
(1)Based on the closing stock price of $215.16 as of January 31, 2023, the value of vested PSUs was 97% of the short-term incentive target.
(2)Mr. Di Fronzo was not eligible for short-term incentive compensation as he was not an employee in March 2023.
Fiscal Year 2024 Short-Term Incentive Compensation
In fiscal year 2024, the bonus awards for each of our NEOs will continue to be determined under the Autodesk, Inc. Executive Incentive Plan. Near the beginning of the fiscal year, the Committee retained total revenue, non-GAAP income from operations, and absolute TSR as the threshold funding metrics. If the funding metrics are achieved, in its exercise of discretion, the Committee will consider Autodesk’s performance attainment versus pre-established targets to determine payouts against total revenue and non-GAAP income from operations, which have been retained as the performance metrics for the ultimate determination of bonus payments, with the following weighting:
| Performance Metric | Weighting | |||||||
| Total Revenue | 60% | |||||||
| Non-GAAP Income from Operations | 40% | |||||||
The Committee believes that the metrics selected for the fiscal year 2024 EIP will align our incentives with key drivers of success. The final awards for our NEOs could range from 0% to 200% of target, depending on the performance achieved. In selecting total revenue and non-GAAP income from operations, the Committee also considered stockholder feedback in support of simplicity, metrics that reflect our evolved business model, and focus on profitability, as well as the practices of our peer companies. The Committee continuously assesses our compensation program structure and metrics to respond to business needs, industry practices, and the talent market.
Long-Term Incentive Compensation
Autodesk uses long-term incentive compensation in the form of equity awards to align executive pay opportunities with stockholder value creation and to motivate and reward executive officers for effectively executing longer-term strategic and operational objectives.
2023 Proxy Statement | 35
Fiscal Year 2023 Annual Long-Term Equity Awards
During fiscal year 2023, the Committee approved annual equity awards in the form of PSUs and restricted stock units (“RSUs”) for our NEOs. The Committee elected to continue to use a mix of 60% PSUs and 40% RSUs for each of our NEOs, including our CEO, to complement the performance aspects of PSUs with the long-term retention element of RSUs.
In arriving at the total number of PSUs and RSUs to award each executive officer in fiscal year 2023, the Committee considered Autodesk’s performance in fiscal year 2022, competitive market data for the executive’s position, historical grants, unvested equity, individual performance of the executive and internal pay alignment. In addition, the Committee took into account the CEO’s recommendations when determining the final awards for the other NEOs, and, as described above on page 28, also considered the overall company progress and outcomes on ESG when it determined long-term incentive awards for the CEO. In fiscal year 2023, the CEO and Committee concluded that the leadership team met expectations for progress on ESG initiatives, and therefore long-term incentive awards for NEOs were not adjusted.
As a result of this analysis, the following equity awards were approved in fiscal year 2023:
Named Executive Officer | Target Value of PSU and RSU Award | Target PSU Award (#) (1) | RSU Award (#) (1) | |||||||||||||||||
| Andrew Anagnost | $17,900,000 | 51,140 | 34,093 | |||||||||||||||||
| Deborah L. Clifford | $5,000,000 | 14,285 | 9,523 | |||||||||||||||||
| Steven M. Blum | $6,100,000 | 17,427 | 11,618 | |||||||||||||||||
| Ruth Ann Keene | $3,500,000 | 9,999 | 6,666 | |||||||||||||||||
| Rebecca Pearce | $3,082,000 | 8,805 | 5,870 | |||||||||||||||||
| Former Executive Officer | ||||||||||||||||||||
Pascal W. Di Fronzo (2) | $— | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
_________________
(1)Number of shares determined by the weighting of PSUs and RSUs and the average closing stock price over the last 20 trading days prior to the date of grant.
(2)Mr. Di Fronzo did not receive fiscal year 2023 annual long-term incentive awards in April 2022 given his planned retirement.
PSU Awards
Our current PSU design was adopted following extensive stockholder outreach and incorporates a number of features our stockholders have identified as being most important, including multiple performance metrics, TSR relative to peers, and a multi-year measurement period.
The PSU awards provide for a minimum, target, and maximum number of shares to be earned based upon predetermined performance criteria.
•For fiscal year 2023 awards, PSU vesting will be based on achievement of performance goals adopted by the Committee (“Performance Results”) and Autodesk’s TSR compared against companies in the S&P North American Technology Software Index with a market capitalization over $2 billion (“Relative TSR”) over one-, two-, and three-year performance periods.
•In fiscal year 2023, we measured Performance Results based on total revenue and free cash flow. In connection with the uncertain economic conditions resulting from the war in Ukraine, including the discontinuation of revenue from Russia, the Committee updated the plan targets in May 2022 to reflect the Company’s fiscal year 2023 financial plan by adjusting the performance targets downward. This adjustment did not result in a material modification of those PSU awards, nor did it result in recognition of incremental grant date fair value on our consolidated financial statements. The updated total revenue and free cash flow performance targets were 17% and 38% above last year’s actual performance achievement, respectively.
•The use of multiple goals motivates management to drive Autodesk’s growth, provides a balance of short- and long-term focus, and, combined with Relative TSR and vesting over one-, two-, and three-year performance periods, aligns these awards with the long-term interests of our stockholders.
36 | AUTODESK, INC.
Performance Results for the relevant performance period could result in PSU attainment of 0% to 150% of target. Once the Performance Results percentage is established, it is multiplied by a percentage ranging from 67% to 133%, depending on Autodesk’s Relative TSR for the period. The combined impact of these performance criteria is that PSUs could be earned from 0% to 200% of target. The chart below illustrates the attainment mechanics for the PSUs approved in fiscal year 2023.
Fiscal Year 2023 (First PSU Tranche) | Fiscal Year 2024 (Second PSU Tranche) | Fiscal Year 2025 (Third PSU Tranche) | ||||||||||||
Fiscal Year 2023 Target Shares Multiplied by: Fiscal Year 2023 Financial Performance (0%-150% of Target) Multiplied by: Fiscal Year 2022-2023 Relative TSR (+/- 33%) | Fiscal Year 2024 Target Shares Multiplied by: Fiscal Year 2024 Financial Performance (0%-150% of Target) Multiplied by: Fiscal Year 2022-2024 Relative TSR (+/- 33%) | Fiscal Year 2025 Target Shares Multiplied by: Fiscal Year 2025 Financial Performance (0%-150% of Target) Multiplied by: Fiscal Year 2022-2025 Relative TSR (+/- 33%) | ||||||||||||
An executive who has received PSU grants in three successive years will have a portion of the total PSU shares vesting in the third year based on each of 3-year, 2-year and 1-year Relative TSR (see “Vesting of PSUs” below for an illustration of this cumulative effect of multiple PSU grants).
Vesting of PSUs in 2023
In March 2023, the Committee reviewed and certified the attainment levels for performance measures for the third tranche of PSUs awarded in April 2020, the second tranche of PSUs awarded in April 2021, and the first tranche of PSUs awarded in April 2022. For each award, the Committee measured the following performance:
| Performance Metric (1) | Weighting | Actual (in millions) | Target (in millions) | Performance Attainment % | Funding | Weighted Funding | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total Revenue | 60% | $5,005 | $5,065 | 98.8% | 94.1% | 56.5% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Free Cash Flow | 40% | $2,031 | $2,044 | 99.4% | 99.1% | 39.6% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total | 100% | 96.1% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
_________________
(1)No excluded results associated with entities acquired during fiscal 2023.
Autodesk’s Relative TSR was based on:
| Performance Period | Autodesk TSR (1) | Percentile Rank (2) | Payout Multiplier | |||||||||||||||||
Fiscal Year 2021 - Fiscal Year 2023 | 7% | 44th Percentile | 92% | |||||||||||||||||
Fiscal Year 2022 - Fiscal Year 2023 | -28% | 41st Percentile | 89% | |||||||||||||||||
Fiscal Year 2023 | -11% | 61st Percentile | 114% | |||||||||||||||||
_________________
(1)Based on the 31-day average closing stock price (+/- 15 days) at the beginning of each period and the end of fiscal year 2023.
(2)Relative TSR was measured against companies in the S&P North American Technology Software Index with a market capitalization over $2 billion.
2023 Proxy Statement | 37
The combination of financial attainment and Relative TSR results yielded the following PSU vesting in fiscal year 2023:
April 2020 3rd Tranche of Fiscal Year 2021 Award | : | Fiscal Year 2023 Financial Goal Funding 96.1% | X | Fiscal Year 2021 - Fiscal Year 2023 Relative TSR 92% | = | Percent of PSU Target Award 88% | ||||||||||||||
April 2021 2nd Tranche of Fiscal Year 2022 Award | : | X | Fiscal Year 2022 - Fiscal Year 2023 Relative TSR 89% | = | Percent of PSU Target Award 86% | |||||||||||||||
April 2022 1st Tranche of Fiscal Year 2023 Award | : | X | Fiscal Year 2023 Relative TSR 114% | = | Percent of PSU Target Award 110% | |||||||||||||||
Based on this performance, the PSU awards were earned as follows:
April 2020 Award 3rd Tranche | April 2021 Award 2nd Tranche | April 2022 Award 1st Tranche | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Named Executive Officer | Target Number of PSUs | Actual Number of PSUs Earned | Target Number of PSUs | Actual Number of PSUs Earned | Target Number of PSUs | Actual Number of PSUs Earned | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Andrew Anagnost | 17,507 | 15,406 | 11,757 | 10,111 | 17,047 | 18,751 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Deborah L. Clifford | N/A | N/A | 3,057 | 2,629 | 4,762 | 5,238 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Steven M. Blum | 5,386 | 4,739 | 2,912 | 2,504 | 5,809 | 6,389 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Ruth Ann Keene | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 3,333 | 3,666 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rebecca Pearce | N/A | N/A | 364 | 313 | 2,935 | 3,228 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Former Executive Officer | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pascal W. Di Fronzo | 4,040 | 3,555 | 1,587 | 1,364 | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RSU Awards
RSUs help us recruit and retain executives in a competitive environment and provide further incentive to focus on longer-term stockholder value creation. In April 2022, our NEOs received time-based RSU awards which vest in three equal annual installments, beginning in March 2023. When Mr. Blum was promoted to the Chief Operating Officer role on February 1, 2022, the Compensation Committee awarded him a one-time promotional RSU award which also vests in three equal annual installments. The promotional RSU award was granted to make Mr. Blum’s target total annual compensation, including the annualized promotional RSU value, within the competitive range of the benchmark median.
Fiscal Year 2024 Equity Awards
For fiscal year 2024, the Committee elected to grant our NEOs 60% of their annual equity in PSUs and 40% in RSUs to align their compensation with Company performance. The fiscal year 2024 PSU awards are structured in the same manner as the fiscal year 2023 PSU awards. The financial performance will continue to be measured based on the following metrics:
| Performance Metric | NEO Weighting | |||||||
| Total Revenue | 60% | |||||||
| Free Cash Flow | 40% | |||||||
38 | AUTODESK, INC.
The Committee selected total revenue and free cash flow as the performance metrics to align our executives' incentives with these key drivers of stockholder value. The Committee determined the overlap of total revenue in the short-term incentive and the PSUs to be appropriate in light of the importance of this goal, the use of different second metrics in the two incentives, and the use of relative TSR modifiers for the PSUs.
The financial performance results will continue to be adjusted based on Autodesk’s Relative TSR over one-, two-, and three-year performance periods with a relative TSR modifier range of 67% to 133%. The payout of the PSUs will continue to range from 0% to 200% of target.
For fiscal year 2024, we have also added more structure to our approach to linking ESG to NEO long-term incentive awards. As part of this effort, we defined quantitative and qualitative measures that leaders will be assessed against to inform the CEO’s recommendations to the Committee for the other NEOs and the Committee’s determination of the final awards for all NEOs. These metrics focus on diversity and belonging (D&B) and environmental sustainability, including:
•Employee belonging and engagement outcomes
•Turnover rates and representation of women and people of color
•Achievement of decarbonization, greenhouse gas neutralization, and renewable energy goals
•Executive involvement in and support of employee groups, external organizations, and other efforts that promote diversity, belonging, and environmental sustainability
For the April 2023 long-term incentive awards (which, consistent with SEC rules, will be disclosed in the fiscal year 2024 proxy statement in May 2024) and beyond, we anticipate that we will continue to refine our measurements and processes as we learn from our internal best practices, as well as practices that continue to emerge in the external market.
Executive Benefits
Welfare and Other Employee Benefits
Benefits provided to our executive officers are generally the same as those provided to all other eligible Autodesk employees. In the United States, these benefits include medical, dental, and vision insurance, 401(k) retirement plan with company matching contributions, an employee stock purchase plan, health and dependent care flexible spending accounts, short-term disability salary continuation, long-term disability insurance, accidental death and dismemberment insurance, basic life insurance coverage, and various paid time off and leave programs.
Ms. Pearce is based in the UK and is eligible to participate in the local employee benefit plans made available to UK-based employees, including an employer pension scheme.
Perquisites and Other Personal Benefits
Autodesk does not, as a general practice, provide material benefits or special considerations to our executive officers that are not provided to other employees. However, from time to time, when deemed appropriate by the Committee, certain executive officers receive perquisites and other personal benefits that are competitively prudent or otherwise in Autodesk’s best interest.
Employment Agreement and Post-Employment Compensation
Employment Agreement with CEO
The terms and conditions of Dr. Anagnost’s employment are set forth in his amended employment agreement, which defines the respective rights of Autodesk and Dr. Anagnost. This agreement provides general protection for Dr. Anagnost in the event of termination without cause or resignation for good reason and has been a valuable tool to incentivize Dr. Anagnost to become our CEO and to retain his services. We believe the protections afforded to our
2023 Proxy Statement | 39
CEO in the event of a change in control promote continuity by helping our CEO maintain focus and dedication to enhance stockholder value. Details of the agreement with Dr. Anagnost can be found beginning on page 43.
Severance Plan
During fiscal year 2019, the Committee adopted the Autodesk, Inc. Severance Plan to establish standard executive severance terms that are competitive with our talent competitors and minimize the need to negotiate individualized executive severance terms in the future. Each of our NEOs (other than our CEO), as well as certain other senior executives, is a participant in the plan. If a participant’s employment is terminated without cause, or if a participant terminates his or her employment for good reason, then, in addition to payment of accrued base salary and vacation and any previously awarded but unpaid bonus, the participant is eligible to receive the following benefits:
•a lump-sum payment equal to the sum of (a) 1.5 times the participant’s base pay in effect on the date of termination and (b) 1.5 times the participant’s target annual cash bonus incentive amount under our annual cash bonus incentive plan applicable to the participant in effect the date of termination (for Rebecca Pearce such lump-sum payment would be inclusive of any severance or payment received during or in relation to her notice period);
•accelerated vesting of the participant’s time-based RSUs that would have become vested had the participant remained continuously employed by Autodesk for an additional 12 months following the termination;
•continued vesting of the participant’s PSUs that would have become vested had the participant remained continuously employed by Autodesk for an additional 12 months following the termination, based on the extent to which the underlying performance criteria, with respect to such awards, are satisfied for such performance period;
•a lump-sum payment in an amount equal to 12 times the monthly premium that the participant would be required to pay to continue his or her group health coverage if the participant had made a timely election under the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985, as amended (“COBRA”) (for Rebecca Pearce such payment is not applicable); and
•Company-provided outplacement services in accordance with Autodesk’s then-applicable outplacement service program or arrangements for 18 months immediately following the date of termination.
In March 2021, we amended the Severance Plan to provide similar benefits as those set forth above to participants who voluntarily terminate employment for qualified retirement. However, in the case of qualified retirement, participants will receive 18 times monthly COBRA premium and they will not be eligible for outplacement services. All payments and other benefits under the Autodesk, Inc. Severance Plan are subject to applicable withholding obligations, the participant’s release of all claims, compliance with certain confidentiality covenants and, in circumstances other than a qualified retirement, non-disparagement and non-solicitation covenants.
Estimates of the potential payments and benefits payable in the event of a termination of employment under the Severance Plan are set forth in “Change-in-Control Arrangements, Severance Plan, Retirement Arrangements, and Employment Agreement” below. We intend to enter into a confirmatory employment letter with Ms. Pearce which will confirm the terms and conditions of her executive severance terms, as well change in control terms discussed in the next section.
Change in Control Program
To ensure the continued service of key executive officers in the event of a potential change in control of Autodesk, the Board has adopted the Autodesk, Inc. Executive Change in Control Program. Each of our NEOs, among other employees, is a participant in the program. The payments and benefits available under this program are designed to encourage the continued services of the NEOs in the event of a potential change in control of Autodesk and to allow for a smooth leadership transition thereafter. Further, these arrangements are intended to provide incentives to the NEOs to execute strategic initiatives that are aligned with stockholder value creation, even if these initiatives may result in the elimination of an NEO’s position.
The Executive Change in Control Program provides continuity in the event of a change in control transaction, which is designed to enhance stockholder value further. Payment and benefits under the Executive Change in Control Program are provided only in the event of a qualifying termination of employment following a change in control
40 | AUTODESK, INC.
(“double trigger”). Autodesk does not offer tax reimbursement or “gross-up” payments under the Executive Change in Control Program.
The material terms and conditions of the Executive Change in Control Program, as well as an estimate of the potential payments and benefits payable in the event of a termination of employment in connection with a change in control of Autodesk, are set forth in “Change-in-Control Arrangements, Severance Plan, Retirement Arrangements, and Employment Agreement” below.
Retirement Provisions in RSU and PSU Agreements
To ensure the continued long-term service of key executive officers through an orderly retirement, the Board has adopted retirement provisions in RSU and PSU agreements entered into with executive officers starting in March 2019. Each of our NEOs, among other employees, is eligible to participate in the program. The retirement benefit available under this program is limited to partial continued vesting of outstanding RSUs and PSUs following a qualified retirement and is designed to encourage the continued long-term services of the NEOs and to allow for a smooth leadership transition upon their retirement. Under the retirement provisions in RSU and PSU agreements, continued vesting is provided only in the event of a qualifying retirement.
The material terms and conditions of the retirement provisions, as well as an estimate of the potential benefit payable in the event of a qualifying retirement, are set forth in “Change-in-Control Arrangements, Severance Plan, Retirement Arrangements, and Employment Agreement” below.
Mandatory Stock Ownership Guidelines
The Board believes that stock ownership by our executive officers is important to promote a long-term perspective and align the interests of our executive officers with those of our stockholders. We have adopted mandatory stock ownership guidelines for our executive officers, which require each executive officer to hold shares of Autodesk’s common stock equivalent in value to a multiple of his or her base salary. This is intended to create clear guidelines that tie a portion of the executive officer’s net worth to the performance of Autodesk’s stock price. The current stock ownership guidelines are as follows:
| CEO | Other Senior Executives | |||||||||||||
| Multiple of Base Salary | 6.0 times | 3.0 times | ||||||||||||
Executive officers have four years from their hire or promotion to a position subject to a higher ownership threshold to satisfy the required level of stock ownership. For purposes of satisfying the required stock ownership level, shares of common stock subject to outstanding RSU awards are counted as shares owned. The Board reviews progress against these guidelines and requirements annually and updates them as appropriate. As of the most recent review of attainment, each of our NEOs satisfied the ownership guidelines.
Clawback Policy
Our Board has adopted a clawback policy which allows for an executive officer’s cash incentive-based compensation to be recovered at the discretion of the Board if that officer has engaged in fraudulent or other intentional misconduct and the misconduct caused a material restatement of our financial statements. We will update our Clawback Policy for compliance with final Nasdaq listing standards and will comply with SEC rules and Nasdaq listing standards related to clawbacks.
Derivatives Trading and Anti-Hedging and Pledging Policy
Our insider trading policy prohibits executive officers, members of the Board, and all other employees from trading derivative securities related to Autodesk’s stock or engaging in short sales or other short-position transactions in shares of our stock. This policy does not restrict ownership of company-granted awards, such as options to purchase shares of our common stock or PSU or RSU awards, which have been granted by the Committee. The policy also prohibits all employees, including our executive officers, and members of the Board, from hedging Autodesk stock, holding it in a margin account, or otherwise pledging Autodesk securities.
2023 Proxy Statement | 41
Equity Award Grant Policy
The Committee approves all equity awards granted to the executive officers. Approval of the equity awards for the executive officers generally occurs at the Committee’s regularly scheduled quarterly meeting, although on occasion the Committee has approved new-hire, retention, or promotion grants outside of that cycle.
Effective Risk Management
Each year, the Committee evaluates Autodesk’s compensation-related risk profile. The Committee has concluded that our compensation programs do not create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on Autodesk.
Regulatory Considerations and Practices
Autodesk continuously reviews and evaluates the impact of tax laws, accounting practices and related interpretations on the executive compensation program. For example, the Committee considers Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718 (“ASC Topic 718”), which results in recognition of compensation expense for share-based payment awards, and Section 409A of the Code, which affects deferred compensation arrangements, as it evaluates, structures, and implements changes to the program.
Deductibility Limitation
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code limits the deductibility of compensation paid to certain executive officers to $1 million per year. The Committee has and will continue to consider Section 162(m) in establishing compensation of our executives but also considers other factors and business needs. Interpretations of and changes in applicable tax laws and regulations as well as other factors beyond our control also can affect deductibility of compensation. For these and other reasons, the Committee has determined that it will not necessarily seek to limit executive compensation to the amount that is deductible under Section 162(m) of the Code.
Taxation of Deferred Compensation
Section 409A of the Code imposes significant additional taxes in the event an executive officer, director, or service provider receives “deferred compensation” that does not satisfy the restrictive conditions of the provision. Section 409A applies to a wide range of compensation arrangements, including traditional non-qualified deferred compensation plans, certain equity awards, and separation arrangements. To assist employees with avoiding additional taxes under Section 409A, Autodesk has structured equity awards in a manner intended to be exempt from or comply with the applicable Section 409A conditions.
Taxation of “Golden Parachute” Payments
Sections 280G and 4999 of the Code provide that executive officers and directors who hold significant equity interests and certain other service providers may be subject to an excise tax if, in connection with a change in control, they receive payments or benefits that exceed certain prescribed limits. In addition, the relevant company or a successor may forfeit a deduction on the amounts subject to this additional tax. Autodesk did not provide any executive officer with a “gross-up” or other reimbursement payment for any tax liability the executive might owe as a result of the application of Sections 280G or 4999 during fiscal year 2023. In addition, Autodesk has not agreed and is not otherwise obligated to provide any NEO with such a “gross-up” or other reimbursement or to otherwise address the application of Sections 280G or 4999 in connection with payments or benefits arising from a change in control.
42 | AUTODESK, INC.
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation
Autodesk follows Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 718 for stock-based compensation awards. ASC Topic 718 requires Autodesk to measure the compensation expense for all share-based payment awards made to employees (including executive officers) and members of the Board, including options to purchase shares of common stock, based on the grant date “fair value” of these awards. Fair value is calculated for accounting purposes and reported in the compensation tables below, even though the executive officers and directors may never realize any value from their awards. ASC Topic 718 also requires Autodesk to recognize the compensation cost of these share-based payment awards in the income statements over the period that an employee or director is required to render service in exchange for the stock option or other award.
Compensation Committee Report
The Compensation and Human Resources Committee of the Board of Directors, which is composed solely of independent members of the Board of Directors, assists the Board in fulfilling its responsibilities regarding compensation matters and, pursuant to its charter, is responsible for determining the compensation of Autodesk’s executive officers. The Compensation and Human Resources Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis included in this Proxy Statement with management. Based on this review and discussion, the Compensation and Human Resources Committee has recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement.
COMPENSATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Mary T. McDowell, Chair
Reid French
Reid French
Rami Rahim
2023 Proxy Statement | 43
Summary Compensation Table
The Summary Compensation Table below presents information concerning the total compensation of our named executive officers for fiscal years 2023, 2022 and 2021.
| Named Executive Officer and Principal Position | Fiscal Year | Salary ($) | Bonus ($) (1) | Stock Awards ($) (2) | Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($) (3) | All Other Compensation ($) (4) | Total ($) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Andrew Anagnost | 2023 | 1,040,416 | — | 16,494,632 | — | 65,704 | 17,600,752 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Chief Executive Officer and | 2022 | 1,000,452 | — | 21,095,069 | — | — | 22,095,521 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| President (5) | 2021 | 975,559 | — | 13,559,493 | 1,221,311 | — | 15,756,363 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Deborah L. Clifford | 2023 | 626,318 | 91,233 | 3,781,422 | — | 69,449 | 4,568,422 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Executive Vice President and | 2022 | 540,247 | — | 9,943,056 | 420,300 | — | 10,903,603 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Chief Financial Officer (6) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Steven M. Blum, | 2023 | 704,586 | — | 7,363,064 | — | 92,992 | 8,160,642 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Executive Vice President and | 2022 | 610,909 | — | 6,140,367 | — | — | 6,751,276 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Chief Operating Officer (7) | 2021 | 591,187 | — | 6,306,531 | 444,000 | — | 7,341,718 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Ruth Ann Keene | 2023 | 536,982 | — | 2,324,237 | — | 59,977 | 2,921,196 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Executive Vice President | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Corporate Affairs, Chief Legal Officer and Corporate Secretary (8) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rebecca Pearce | 2023 | 371,859 | — | 2,040,421 | — | 151,614 | 2,563,894 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Executive Vice President and | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Chief People Officer (9) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Former Executive Officer | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Pascal W. Di Fronzo, | 2023 | 144,965 | — | 1,023,354 | — | 2,235,995 | 3,404,314 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Executive Vice President | 2022 | 514,500 | — | 3,660,539 | — | — | 4,175,039 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Corporate Affairs, Chief Legal Officer and Secretary (10) | 2021 | 513,793 | — | 2,805,623 | 385,875 | — | 3,705,291 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
_____________
(1)Represents payments made to our named executive officers for amounts that relate to: signing bonuses and payments made in recognition of years of service as part of an Autodesk company-wide program.
(2)Amounts consist of the aggregate grant date value for PSU and RSU awards computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, based on target levels of achievement (the probable outcome at grant) in the case of PSUs and does not reflect actual amounts earned. The assumptions used in the valuation of these awards are set forth in Note 1, “Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 14, 2023. The maximum value of PSU awards generally is capped at 200% of target for fiscal year 2021 through fiscal year 2023. The maximum values for PSU awards granted in fiscal year 2023 are as follows: Dr. Anagnost: $19,418,204; Ms. Clifford: $3,772,118; Mr. Blum: $6,186,072; Ms. Keene: $1,995,005; Ms. Pearce: $1,744,229, and Mr. Di Fronzo: $2,046,709. Actual PSU awards earned in fiscal year 2023 by the named executive officers are shown in “Long-Term Incentive Compensation" in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis. Amounts also include grant date for value for PSUs issued pursuant to the bonus to equity exchange program discussed in “Annual Short-Term Incentive Compensation” in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis.
(3)Represents amounts earned for services performed during the relevant fiscal year pursuant to our short-term cash incentive plan (“EIP”) for all executive officers shown. The amounts shown reflect the total cash amounts awarded under the EIP, which are payable in the first quarter of the following fiscal year.
(4)Represents all other compensation for the relevant fiscal year not reported in the previous columns, authorized familial travel in connection with business trips, Autodesk’s matching contributions to pre-tax savings plans, Autodesk’s donation matching, insurance premiums, personal gifts and related tax gross ups. Generally, unless the items included in this category exceed the greater of $25,000 or 10% of the total amount of perquisites received by a given named executive officer, individual perquisites are not separately identified and quantified.
(5)Dr. Anagnost's other compensation for fiscal 2023 includes $28,738 authorized executive and spouse travel in connection with a business trip and tax gross-ups of $29,870 for certain perquisites.
(6)Ms. Clifford’s other compensation for fiscal 2023 includes $27,099 authorized executive and spouse travel in connection with a business trip and tax gross-ups of $28,757 for certain perquisites.
(7)Mr. Blum’s other compensation for fiscal 2023 includes $48,101 authorized executive and spouse travel in connection with a business trip and tax gross-ups of $32,491 for certain perquisites.
44 | AUTODESK, INC.
(8)Ms. Keene’s other compensation for fiscal 2023 includes $25,971 authorized executive and spouse travel in connection with a business trip and tax gross-ups of $26,062 for certain perquisites. Ms. Keene was not a named executive officer during fiscal 2022 or fiscal 2021.
(9)Ms. Pearce’s salary and other compensation are paid or provided in British Pounds. These amounts represent the approximate dollar value of her base salary and other compensation converted to U.S. dollars using the British Pound to dollar exchange rate of 1.23, which represents an average for fiscal 2023. Ms. Pearce’s other compensation for fiscal 2023 includes $46,872 authorized executive and spouse travel, in connection with a business trip, tax gross-ups of $43,978 for certain perquisites, and $37,186 for employer contributions to UK pension plan. Ms. Pearce’s other compensation for fiscal 2023 also includes a car allowance. Ms. Pearce was not a named executive officer during fiscal 2022 or fiscal 2021.
(10)Mr. Di Fronzo’s retirement from Autodesk was effective May 9, 2022. The amount reported under “Salary” column for fiscal 2023 represents the salary he received from February 1, 2023 through May 8, 2022. The amount reported under “Stock Awards” for fiscal 2023 represents grant date value for PSU awards which were approved by the Compensation Committee in fiscal 2021 and 2022 as part of his compensation in those periods. The Committee did not approve any equity awards to Mr. Di Fronzo in fiscal 2023. The amount reported under “All Other Compensation” for fiscal 2023 represents amounts received per the terms of his Qualified Retirement Agreement.
Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal Year 2023
Grants of plan-based awards reflect grants made to our named executive officers under our non-equity incentive plans and equity compensation plans during fiscal year 2023. The following tables include potential threshold, target, and maximum amounts payable under our EIP for performance during fiscal year 2023, and do not constitute compensation on top of the amounts included in the Summary Compensation Table. However, these amounts do not reflect amounts actually earned for fiscal year 2023. The following table also includes amounts relating to PSUs and RSUs issued under our 2012 Stock Plan. See “Annual Short-Term Incentive Compensation" and “Long-Term Incentive Compensation" in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis for actual amounts earned in fiscal year 2023 by the named executive officers and further discussion of plan-based and other awards.
2023 Proxy Statement | 45
The following tables present information concerning grants of plan-based awards to each of the named executive officers during fiscal year 2023:
| Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards (2) | Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards (3) | All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock (#)(4) | Grant Date Fair Value of Stock Awards ($) (5) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Named Executive Officer | Grant Date (1) | Threshold ($) | Target ($) | Maximum ($) | Threshold (#) | Target (#) | Maximum (#) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Andrew | 4/10/2022 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 34,093 | 6,785,530 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Anagnost | 4/10/2022 | — | — | — | — | 17,507 | 35,014 | — | 3,146,533 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 4/10/2022 | — | — | — | — | 11,757 | 23,514 | — | 2,202,086 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 4/10/2022 | — | — | — | — | 17,047 | 34,094 | — | 3,175,856 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 4/10/2022 | — | — | — | — | 5,952 | 11,904 | — | 1,184,627 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Deborah L. | 4/10/2022 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 9,523 | 1,895,363 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Clifford | 4/10/2022 | — | — | — | — | 3,057 | 6,114 | — | 572,576 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 4/10/2022 | — | — | — | — | 4,762 | 9,524 | — | 887,161 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 4/10/2022 | — | — | — | — | 2,142 | 4,284 | — | 426,322 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Steve M. | 2/1/2022 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 7,838 | 1,957,697 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Blum | 4/10/2022 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 11,618 | 2,312,331 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 4/10/2022 | — | — | — | — | 5,386 | 10,772 | — | 968,026 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 4/10/2022 | — | — | — | — | 2,912 | 5,824 | — | 545,418 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 4/10/2022 | — | — | — | — | 5,809 | 11,618 | — | 1,082,217 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 4/10/2022 | — | — | — | — | 2,499 | 4,998 | — | 497,376 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Ruth Ann | 4/10/2022 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 6,666 | 1,326,734 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Keene | 4/10/2022 | — | — | — | — | 3,333 | 6,666 | — | 620,938 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 4/10/2022 | — | — | — | — | 1,892 | 3,784 | — | 376,565 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rebecca | 4/10/2022 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 5,870 | 1,168,306 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Pearce | 4/10/2022 | — | — | — | — | 364 | 728 | — | 68,177 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 4/10/2022 | — | — | — | — | 2,935 | 5,870 | — | 546,791 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 4/10/2022 | — | — | — | — | 1,292 | 2,584 | — | 257,147 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Former Executive Officer (6) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Pascal W. | 4/10/2022 | — | — | — | — | 4,040 | 8,080 | 726,109 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Di Fronzo | 4/10/2022 | — | — | — | — | 1,587 | 3,174 | 297,245 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(1)Reflects the date on which the Committee approved the grant of an equity award or, if later in the case of a PSU award, the date on which the Committee established the performance metric underlying such award or a component thereof.
(2)Reflects target and maximum dollar amounts payable under the EIP for performance during fiscal year 2023, as described in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Principal Elements of the Executive Compensation Program.” “Threshold” refers to the minimum amount payable for a certain level of performance; “Target” refers to the amount payable if specified performance targets are reached; and “Maximum” refers to the maximum payout possible. At the end of fiscal year 2022, all NEOs elected to participate in the bonus to equity exchange program and did not participate in the EIP.
(3)Except as described below, represents shares of our common stock subject to each of the PSU awards granted to the named executive officers in fiscal year 2023 under our 2012 Stock Plan. These columns show the awards that were possible at the threshold, target, and maximum levels of performance. Shares were to be earned based upon a total revenue and free cash flow goal for fiscal year 2023 adopted by the Committee (the “Annual Financial Results”), as well as TSR compared against the companies in the S&P Computer Software Select Index or the S&P North American Technology Software Index with a market capitalization over $2 billion (“Relative TSR”). In each case, Annual Financial Results for the relevant performance period could result in PSU attainment, subject to the Relative TSR modifier, of 0%-150% of target. Once the Annual Financial Results percentage is established, it is multiplied by a percentage ranging from 67%-133%, depending on Autodesk's Relative TSR performance for the period. Ultimately, PSUs could be earned from 0%-200% of target. Actual PSU awards earned in fiscal year 2023 by the named executive officers under this program are shown in “Long-Term Incentive Compensation” in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis. The last rows for each NEO reflects PSUs issued pursuant to the bonus to equity exchange program discussed in “Annual Short-Term Incentive Compensation” in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis.
(4)RSUs granted on April 10, 2022 vest in three equal annual installments beginning on March 27, 2023.
(5)Reflects the grant date fair value of each equity award. The assumptions used in the valuation of these awards are set forth in Note 1, “Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 14, 2023. These amounts do not correspond to the actual value that will be realized by the named executive officers upon the vesting of RSUs or the sale of the common stock underlying such awards.
(6)The amount reported under Mr. Di Fronzo represents grant date value for PSU awards which were approved by the Compensation Committee in fiscal 2021 and 2022 as part of his compensation in those periods. The Committee did not approve any equity awards to Mr. Di Fronzo in fiscal 2023.
46 | AUTODESK, INC.
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year 2023 Year End
The following table presents information concerning outstanding unvested RSU and PSU awards for each named executive officer as of January 31, 2023. This table includes RSUs and PSUs granted under the 2012 Stock Plan. Unless otherwise indicated, all RSU awards vest in three equal annual installments beginning on the first anniversary of the date of grant.
| Stock Awards | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Named Executive Officer | Grant Date | Number of Shares of Stock That Have Not Vested (#) | Market Value of Shares of Stock That Have Not Vested ($) (1) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Andrew Anagnost | 4/9/2020 | 15,406 | (2) | $ | 3,314,755 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 4/9/2020 | 11,671 | 2,511,132 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 4/10/2021 | 21,868 | (3) | 4,705,119 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| 4/10/2021 | 15,676 | 3,372,848 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 4/10/2022 | 52,844 | (4) | 11,369,915 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| 4/10/2022 | 5,648 | (5) | 1,215,224 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| 4/10/2022 | 34,093 | 7,335,450 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Deborah L. Clifford | 3/8/2021 | 4,787 | (6) | 1,029,971 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| 4/10/2021 | 5,686 | (3) | 1,223,400 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| 4/10/2021 | 4,076 | 876,992 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 4/10/2022 | 14,761 | (4) | 3,175,977 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| 4/10/2022 | 2,032 | (5) | 437,205 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| 4/10/2022 | 9,523 | 2,048,969 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Steven M. Blum | 4/9/2020 | 4,739 | (2) | 1,019,643 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| 4/9/2020 | 3,591 | 772,640 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 4/10/2021 | 5,416 | (3) | 1,165,307 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| 4/10/2021 | 3,882 | 835,251 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2/1/2022 | 7,838 | 1,957,697 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 4/10/2022 | 18,007 | (4) | 3,874,386 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| 4/10/2022 | 2,371 | (5) | 510,144 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| 4/10/2022 | 11,618 | 2,499,729 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Ruth Ann Keene | 1/27/2022 | 45,884 | (7) | 10,491,835 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| 4/10/2022 | 10,332 | (4) | 2,223,033 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| 4/10/2022 | 1,795 | (5) | 386,212 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| 4/10/2022 | 6,666 | 1,434,257 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rebecca Pearce | 8/10/2020 | 217 | 46,690 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| 4/10/2021 | 677 | (3) | 145,663 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| 4/10/2021 | 728 | 156,636 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 11/10/2021 | 2,469 | (8) | 531,230 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1/4/2022 | 3,244 | 697,979 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 4/10/2022 | 9,098 | (4) | 1,957,526 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| 4/10/2022 | 1,226 | (5) | 263,786 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| 4/10/2022 | 5,870 | 1,262,989 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Former Executive Officer | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pascal W. Di Fronzo (9) | 04/09/2020 | 3,555 | (2) | 764,894 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| 04/10/2021 | 1,364 | (3) | 293,478 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
_____________
(1)Market value of RSUs and PSUs that have not vested is computed by multiplying (i) $215.16, the closing price on the Nasdaq of Autodesk common stock on January 31, 2023, the last trading day of fiscal year 2023, by (ii) the number of shares of stock underlying the applicable award.
(2)Awards relate to the third-year tranche of PSU awards granted on April 9, 2020, under the 2012 Plan. These PSUs were subject to achievement of a total revenue and free cash flow goal for fiscal year 2023 adopted by the Committee, as well as Relative TSR. This tranche was earned as of January 31, 2023, and subject to vest on March 21, 2023.
(3)Awards related to the second- and third-year tranches of PSU awards granted on April 10, 2021, under the 2012 Plan. The second-year tranche of these PSUs was subject to achievement of a total revenue and free cash flow goal for fiscal year
2023 Proxy Statement | 47
2023 adopted by the Committee, as well as Relative TSR. The second-year tranche was earned as of January 31, 2023, and subject to vest on March 27, 2023.
(4)Awards related to the first-, second-, and third-year tranches of PSU awards granted on April 10, 2022, under the 2012 Plan. The first-year tranche of these PSUs were subject to achievement of a total revenue and free cash flow goal for fiscal year 2023 adopted by the Committee, as well as Relative TSR. The first-year tranche was earned as of January 31, 2023, and subject to vest on March 27, 2023.
(5)Awards related to the bonus to equity exchange program PSU Awards granted on April 10, 2022 in lieu of an annual cash bonus under the Executive Incentive Plan. The PSUs have a one-year vest period and were subject to achievement of a total revenue and non-GAAP income from operations goal for fiscal year 2023 adopted by the Committee. These PSUs were earned as of January 31, 2023, and subject to vest on March 27, 2023.
(6)RSUs granted to Ms. Clifford on March 8, 2021 vest per the terms of her employment agreement.
(7)RSUs granted to Ms. Keene on January 27, 2022 vest per the terms of her employment agreement.
(8)The remaining unvested RSUs granted to Ms. Pearce on November 10, 2021 will vest on November 10, 2023.
(9)Mr. Di Fronzo retired from Autodesk on May 9, 2022. His PSUs that would have become vested had he remained continuously employed by Autodesk for an additional 12 months following the termination will continue to vest based on actual performance achieved. Mr. Di Fronzo did not receive the fiscal year 2023 annual long-term incentive awards that were granted to other NEOs on April 10, 2022.
Option Exercises and Stock Vested in Fiscal Year 2023
There were no stock options exercised by any of the named executive officers during fiscal year 2023. The following table presents information concerning the vesting of stock awards held by each of the named executive officers during fiscal year 2023.
| Stock Awards | ||||||||||||||
| Named Executive Officer | Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#) | Value Realized on Vesting ($) (1) | ||||||||||||
| Andrew Anagnost | 73,627 | 15,698,947 | ||||||||||||
| Deborah L. Clifford | 14,274 | 2,907,409 | ||||||||||||
| Steven M. Blum | 27,805 | 5,806,355 | ||||||||||||
| Ruth Ann Keene | 45,885 | 8,515,797 | ||||||||||||
| Rebecca Pearce | 7,581 | 1,494,103 | ||||||||||||
| Former Executive Officer | ||||||||||||||
| Pascal W. Di Fronzo | 17,778 | 3,802,403 | ||||||||||||
______________
(1)Reflects the number of shares acquired on vesting of RSUs or PSUs multiplied by the closing market price of our common stock as reported on the Nasdaq on the vesting date.
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation for Fiscal Year 2023
Under our Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan, certain U.S.-based officers (including named executive officers) may defer compensation earned such as salary or awards under the EIP. Deferral elections are made by eligible executive officers each year during an open enrollment period for amounts to be earned in the following year. Autodesk does not make any contribution for executive officers under the Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan. Prior to April 2013, we maintained the Autodesk, Inc. Equity Incentive Deferral Plan, which permitted certain executive officers to defer up to 50% of their EIP award.
48 | AUTODESK, INC.
The following table presents information regarding non-qualified deferred compensation activity for each listed officer during fiscal year 2023:
| Named Executive Officer | Executive Contributions (Distributions) in Fiscal Year ($) | Aggregate Earnings/ (Losses) in Fiscal Year ($) (1) | Aggregate Balance at Fiscal Year End ($) | |||||||||||||||||
| Andrew Anagnost | 257,315 | (249,513) | 5,180,939 | |||||||||||||||||
| Deborah L. Clifford | 59,584 | (8,544) | 273,874 | |||||||||||||||||
| Steven M. Blum | — | (203,719) | 2,236,694 | |||||||||||||||||
| Ruth Ann Keene | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
| Rebecca Pearce | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
| Former Executive Officer | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Pascal W. Di Fronzo | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
_____________
(1)None of the earnings or losses in this column are reflected in the Summary Compensation Table because they are not considered preferential or above market.
Pay versus Performance
Under rules adopted pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Act, we are required to disclose certain information about the relationship between the compensation actually paid (“CAP”) as determined under the rules to our named executive officers and certain measures of company performance for the fiscal years listed below. The material that follows is provided in compliance with these rules; however, additional information regarding our compensation philosophy, the structure of our performance-based compensation programs, and compensation decisions made this year is described above in our "Compensation Discussion and Analysis". The Committee did not consider the pay versus performance disclosure below in marking its pay decisions for any of the fiscal years shown.
The following table provides information regarding compensation actually paid to our principal executive officer, or PEO, and other NEOs (“non-PEO NEOs”) for each year from fiscal year 2021 to fiscal year 2023, compared to our total shareholder return (“TSR”) from January 31, 2020 through the end of each such fiscal year, and our net income and total revenue for each such year.
| Value of initial fixed $100 investment based on | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fiscal Year | Summary compen-sation table total for PEO ($) (1) (2) | Compensation actually paid to PEO ($) (1) (3) | Average summary compensation table total for non-PEO NEOs ($) (4) | Average compensation actually paid to non-PEO NEOs ($) (5) | Total shareholder return ($) (6) | Peer group total shareholder return ($) (7) | Net income ($ Millions) (8) | Total Revenue ($ Millions) (9) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2023 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2022 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
_____________
(1) Our PEO was Andrew Anagnost for each of the fiscal years 2023, 2022, and 2021.
(2) The dollar amounts reflect the total compensation reported for Dr. Anagnost for each listed fiscal year in the “Total” column of the Summary Compensation Table.
(3) The dollar amounts reflect the compensation actually paid to Dr. Anagnost for each listed fiscal year as calculated in accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K. The dollar amounts do not reflect the actual amount of compensation earned by or paid to Mr. Anagnost during the applicable year and don’t mean that he will even earn or be paid those amounts, but reflect adjustments made to the total compensation as reported in the Summary Compensation Table in accordance with the requirements of Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K as shown in the table below:
2023 Proxy Statement | 49
2023 ($) | 2022 ($) | 2021 ($) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Summary Compensation Table Total | ||||||||||||||||||||
Subtract Grant Date Fair Value of Stock Awards Granted in Fiscal Year | ||||||||||||||||||||
Add Fair Value at Fiscal Year-End of Outstanding and Unvested Stock Awards Granted in Fiscal Year | ||||||||||||||||||||
Adjust for Change in Fair Value of Outstanding and Unvested Stock Awards Granted in Prior Fiscal Years | ( | ( | ||||||||||||||||||
Add Fair Value at Vesting of Stock Awards Granted in Fiscal Year That Vested During Fiscal Year | ||||||||||||||||||||
Adjust for Change in Fair Value as of Vesting Date of Stock Awards Granted in Prior Fiscal Years For Which Applicable Vesting Conditions Were Satisfied During Fiscal Year | ( | ( | ( | |||||||||||||||||
Subtract Fair Value as of Prior Fiscal Year-End of Stock Awards Granted in Prior Fiscal Years That Failed to Meet Applicable Vesting Conditions During Fiscal Year | ||||||||||||||||||||
Add Value of Dividends or other Earnings Paid on Stock Awards not Otherwise Reflected in Fair Value or Total Compensation | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Compensation Actually Paid | ||||||||||||||||||||
(4) The dollar amounts reflect the average of the total compensation reported for our non-PEO NEOs in the “Total” column of the Summary Compensation Table for each applicable fiscal year. The names of the non-PEO NEOs in each year are listed in the table below.
| 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | ||||||||||||
| Deborah L. Clifford | Deborah L. Clifford | Steven M. Blum | ||||||||||||
| Steven M. Blum | Steven M. Blum | Pascal W. Di Fronzo | ||||||||||||
| Ruth Ann Keene | Pascal W. Di Fronzo | R. Scott Herren | ||||||||||||
| Rebecca Pearce | — | Carmel Galvin | ||||||||||||
| Pascal W. Di Fronzo | — | — | ||||||||||||
(5) The dollar amounts reflect the average of compensation actually paid to our non-PEO NEOs, as calculated in accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K, for each listed fiscal year. The dollar amounts do not reflect the actual amount of compensation earned by or paid to non-PEO NEOs during the applicable year and don’t mean that they will even earn or be paid those amounts, but reflect adjustments made to the total compensation as reported in the Summary Compensation Table in accordance with the requirements of Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K as shown in the table below:
50 | AUTODESK, INC.
2023 ($) | 2022 ($) | 2021 ($) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Summary Compensation Table Total | ||||||||||||||||||||
Subtract Grant Date Fair Value of Stock Awards Granted in Fiscal Year | ||||||||||||||||||||
Add Fair Value at Fiscal Year-End of Outstanding and Unvested Stock Awards Granted in Fiscal Year | ||||||||||||||||||||
Adjust for Change in Fair Value of Outstanding and Unvested Stock Awards Granted in Prior Fiscal Years | ( | ( | ||||||||||||||||||
| Add Fair Value at Vesting of Stock Awards Granted in Fiscal Year That Vested During Fiscal Year | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Adjust for Change in Fair Value as of Vesting Date of Stock Awards Granted in Prior Fiscal Years For Which Applicable Vesting Conditions Were Satisfied During Fiscal Year | ( | ( | ( | |||||||||||||||||
| Subtract Fair Value as of Prior Fiscal Year-End of Stock Awards Granted in Prior Fiscal Years That Failed to Meet Applicable Vesting Conditions During Fiscal Year (10) | ( | |||||||||||||||||||
Add Value of Dividends or other Earnings Paid on Stock Awards not Otherwise Reflected in Fair Value or Total Compensation | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Compensation Actually Paid | ||||||||||||||||||||
(6) Total shareholder return is calculated by assuming that a $100 investment was made on the day prior to the first fiscal year reported below and all dividends were reinvested until the last day of each reported fiscal year.
(7) For purpose of this peer group disclosure, we have used the S&P North American Technology Software Index, as used in the Company's performance graph in our annual report on Form 10-K. Total shareholder return is calculated by assuming that a $100 investment was made on the day prior to the first fiscal year reported below and all dividends were reinvested until the last day of each reported fiscal year.
(8) The dollar amounts reported are the Company's net income reflected in the Company’s audited financial statements.
(9) In the Company's assessment, total revenue is the financial performance measure that is the most important financial performance measure (other than total shareholder return and net income) used by the Company to link compensation actually paid to performance. Please see the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section above for a further discussion of revenue and how it is utilized in our executive compensation program. The dollar amounts reported represent the Company’s total revenue as reflected in the Company’s audited financial statements.
(10) Reflects the value of the awards that Mr. Di Fronzo forfeited after his departure in fiscal year 2023.
Tabular List of Performance Measures
The four items listed below represent the most important metrics we used to link performance actually paid to our NEOs, for fiscal year 2023, to company performance. Among other things, these measures were generally used to determine the EIP payouts and the PSU payouts for NEOs in fiscal year 2023 as further described in our “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” within the sections titled “Annual Short-Term Incentive Compensation” and “Long-Term Incentive Compensation.”
Relationship between CAP and Company TSR as well as Peer Group TSR
The graph below reflects the relationship between the PEO and Average Non-PEO NEO CAP and the Company’s cumulative Total Shareholder Return, or TSR, (assuming an initial fixed investment of $100) for the fiscal years ended January 31, 2021, January 31, 2022, and January 31, 2023. The graph also shows the cumulative indexed TSR of the S&P North American Technology Software Index.
2023 Proxy Statement | 51
Relationship between CAP and Net Income
The graph below reflects the relationship between the PEO and Average Non-PEO NEOs CAP and the Company’s Net Income for the last three completed fiscal years.
52 | AUTODESK, INC.
Relationship between CAP and Total Net Revenue
The graph below compares the PEO and Non-PEO NEOs’ CAP to the Company’s Total Net Revenue for the last three completed fiscal years.
CEO Pay Ratio
In accordance with SEC rules, we are providing the ratio of the annual total compensation of our CEO to the annual total compensation of our median employee (excluding our CEO). The fiscal year 2023 annual total compensation of our CEO was $17,600,752. The fiscal year 2023 annual total compensation of our median compensated employee was $141,211, and the ratio of these amounts was 124.6 to 1.
To identify the median employee, we examined the compensation of our full- and part-time employees (other than our CEO) as of the last day of our fiscal year. We used target total direct compensation as our consistently applied compensation measure. Target total direct compensation for this purpose consisted of each employee’s estimated salary earnings, target non-equity incentive opportunity, and the fair market value price of his or her equity incentive awards granted in fiscal year 2023. We also converted all employee compensation, on a country-by-country basis, to U.S. dollars based on the applicable year-end exchange rate. After identifying the median employee, we calculated the annual total compensation for such employee using the same methodology that we used for our NEOs as set forth in the Summary Compensation Table. In fiscal year 2023 the pay ratio increased year-over-year based largely upon an increase in variable stock-based compensation for our CEO.
The pay ratio reported above is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with SEC rules, based on our internal records and the methodology described above. The SEC rules for identifying the median compensated employee and calculating the pay ratio based on that employee’s annual total compensation allow companies to adopt a variety of methodologies, to apply certain exclusions, and to make reasonable estimates and assumptions that reflect their employee populations and compensation practices. Accordingly, the pay ratio reported by other companies may not be comparable to the pay ratio reported above, as other companies have different employee
2023 Proxy Statement | 53
populations and compensation practices and may use different methodologies, exclusions, estimates and assumptions in calculating their own pay ratios.
Change-in-Control Arrangements, Severance Plan, Retirement Arrangements, and Employment Agreement
In an effort to ensure the continued service of our executive officers in the event of a change in control, each of our executive officers (other than our CEO) participates in an Executive Change in Control Program (the “Program”) that was initially approved by the Board in March 2006, and most recently amended and restated by the Committee in April 2022. Dr. Anagnost has a change-in-control provision in his employment agreement, as noted below. Additionally, in August 2018, the Committee adopted the Autodesk, Inc. Severance Plan (the “Severance Plan”) to establish standard executive severance terms and to minimize the need to negotiate individualized executive severance terms in the future. Each of our current executive officers (other than our CEO) has been designated by the Committee to participate in the Severance Plan. The Board adopted retirement provisions in RSU and PSU agreements entered into with executive officers starting in March 2019 and amended the Severance Plan in March 2021 to provide benefits for executive officers who voluntarily terminate their employment for a “qualified retirement” as defined under the Severance Plan. Each of our current executive officers is eligible to receive the retirement benefits, although only two of our executive officers currently meet the requirements to have a qualifying retirement under the provisions.
Executive Change in Control Program
Under the terms of the Program, if, within 60 days prior or 12 months following a “change in control,” an executive officer who participates in the Program is terminated without “cause,” or voluntarily terminates his or her employment for “good reason” (as those terms are defined in the Program), the executive officer will receive (among other benefits), following execution of a release and non-solicitation agreement:
•An amount equal to 1.5 times the sum of the participant’s annual base salary and target annual bonus, plus the participant’s pro-rata target bonus, provided the executive officer was eligible to receive such bonus in cash, payable in a lump sum (for Rebecca Pearce such lump-sum payment would be inclusive of any severance or payment received during or in relation to her notice period);
•Acceleration of all of the participant’s outstanding incentive equity awards, including stock options, RSUs, and PSUs (which PSUs shall become vested at the “target” level set forth in the applicable notice of grant);
•Reimbursement of the total applicable premium cost for medical and dental coverage for the participant and his or her eligible spouse and dependents until the earlier of 18 months from the date of termination or when the participant becomes covered under another employer’s employee benefit plans (for Rebecca Pearce such payment is not applicable); and
•An executive officer who is terminated for any other reason will receive severance or other benefits only to the extent the executive would be entitled to receive them under our then-existing benefit plans and policies. If the benefits provided under the Program constitute parachute payments under Section 280G of the Code and are subject to the excise tax imposed by Section 4999 of the Code, then such benefits will be (1) delivered in full, or (2) delivered to such lesser extent that would result in no portion of the benefits being subject to the excise tax, whichever results in the executive officer receiving the greatest amount of benefits.
As defined in the Program, a “change in control” occurs if any person acquires 50% or more of the total voting power represented by voting securities, if Autodesk sells all or substantially all its assets, if Autodesk merges or consolidates with another corporation, or if the composition of the Board changes substantially.
Severance Plan
Termination Without Cause or for Good Reason
Under the terms of the Severance Plan, if a participant in the Severance Plan is terminated without “cause” or voluntarily terminates his or her employment for “good reason” (as those terms are defined in the Severance Plan) then, in addition to payment of accrued base salary, vacation, and any previously awarded but unpaid bonus, the
54 | AUTODESK, INC.
participant will be eligible to receive the following benefits under the Severance Plan, subject to execution of a release and compliance with certain non-disparagement, non-solicitation and confidentiality covenants:
•A lump sum payment equal to the sum of (a) 1.5 times the participant's base pay as in effect on the date of termination, and (b) 1.5 times the participant’s target annual cash bonus incentive amount under Autodesk’s annual cash bonus incentive plan applicable to the participant as in effect on the date of termination (for Rebecca Pearce such lump-sum payment would be inclusive of any severance or payment received during or in relation to her notice period);
•Accelerated vesting of the participant’s time-based RSUs that would have become vested had the participant remained continuously employed by Autodesk for an additional 12 months following the termination;
•Continued vesting of the participant’s PSUs that would have become vested had the participant remained continuously employed by Autodesk for an additional 12 months following the termination, based on the extent to which the underlying performance criteria with respect to such awards are satisfied for such performance period;
•A taxable lump sum payment in an amount equal to 12 times the monthly premium that the participant would be required to pay to continue their group health coverage if the participant had made a timely election under COBRA (for Rebecca Pearce such payment is not applicable); and
•Company-provided outplacement services in accordance with Autodesk’s then-applicable outplacement service program or arrangements for 18 months immediately following the date of termination.
Retirement
In March 2021, we amended the Severance Plan to provide additional benefits to participants who voluntarily terminate employment for qualified retirement. If a participant’s termination is considered a qualified retirement, then, in addition to payment of accrued base salary, vacation, and any previously awarded but unpaid bonus, the participant will be eligible to receive the following benefits under the Severance Plan:
•A lump sum payment equal to the sum of (a) 1.5 times the participant's base pay, (b) 1.5 times the participant’s target annual cash bonus incentive amount under Autodesk’s annual cash bonus incentive plan applicable to the participant as in effect as of the qualified retirement, and (c) a pro-rata portion of the participant’s target annual cash bonus incentive amount as in effect as of the qualified retirement, for the fiscal year in which the qualified retirement occurs;
•Accelerated vesting of the participant’s time-based RSUs that would have become vested had the participant remained continuously employed by Autodesk for an additional 12 months following the qualified retirement;
•Continued vesting of the participant’s PSUs that would have become vested had the participant remained continuously employed by Autodesk for an additional 12 months following the qualified retirement, based on the extent to which the underlying performance criteria with respect to such awards are satisfied for such performance period; and
•A taxable lump sum payment in an amount equal to 18 times the monthly premium that the participant would be required to pay to continue their group health coverage if the participant had made a timely election under COBRA.
For the purposes of the Severance Plan, “qualified retirement” is defined as a voluntary termination of employment by an executive officer, which meets either of the following requirements: (i) one’s combined total age plus years of employment with Autodesk is equal to or greater than 75 or (ii) one is at least 55 years of age and completes at least 10 years of employment with Autodesk. Unless waived by the administrator of the plan or the Chief Executive Officer, in order for such voluntary termination to be deemed a qualified retirement, one must properly deliver written notice of his or her intent to resign employment with Autodesk in a qualified retirement at least three months prior to the effective date of such qualified retirement.
Internal Revenue Code Section 280G
The Severance Plan does not provide for any excise tax payment. In the event that any payment or benefit payable to a participant under the Severance Plan would result in the imposition of excise taxes under the “golden parachute” provisions of Section 280G of the Code, then such payments and benefits will be (1) delivered in full, or
2023 Proxy Statement | 55
(2) delivered to such lesser extent that would result in no portion of the benefits being subject to the excise tax, whichever results in the participant receiving the greatest amount of benefits.
Employment Agreement with Andrew Anagnost
In connection with Dr. Anagnost’s appointment as CEO, in June 2017, Dr. Anagnost entered into an employment agreement with Autodesk, which was amended in April 2022, which provides for, among other things, certain payments and benefits to be provided to Dr. Anagnost in the event his employment is terminated without “cause” or he resigns for “good reason,” including in connection with a “change of control,” as each such term is defined in Dr. Anagnost's employment agreement.
In the event Dr. Anagnost's employment is terminated by Autodesk without cause or if Dr. Anagnost resigns for good reason and in each case such termination is not in connection with a change of control, Dr. Anagnost would receive (i) payment of 200% of his then current base salary for 12 months; (ii) payout of his pro-rata bonus for the fiscal year in which termination occurs, provided Autodesk bonus targets are satisfied, to be paid in one lump sum on or before March 15 of the succeeding fiscal year; (iii) fully accelerated vesting of all of his then outstanding, unvested equity awards (other than any awards that vest in whole or in part based on performance); (iv) with respect to his then outstanding unvested equity awards that vest in whole or in part based on performance, those awards will vest as if he had remained continuously employed by Autodesk through the end of the performance period in which his employment is terminated, based on the extent, if any, that the underlying performance criteria for those awards are satisfied for that performance period, as prorated to reflect the number of days in which he was employed during such period; and (v) reimbursement for premiums paid for continued health benefits for Dr. Anagnost and his eligible dependents until the earlier of 12 months following termination or the date Dr. Anagnost becomes covered under similar health plans. In addition, Dr. Anagnost is subject to non-solicitation and non-competition covenants for 12 months following a termination that gives rise to the severance benefits discussed above.
If, in connection with a change of control, Dr. Anagnost’s employment is terminated by Autodesk without cause or if Dr. Anagnost resigns for good reason, Dr. Anagnost would receive (i) a lump sum payment in an amount equal to 200% of his annual base salary and target annual bonus; (ii) payout of his pro-rata target bonus for the fiscal year in which termination occurs to be paid in one lump sum on or before March 15 of the succeeding fiscal year; (iii) fully accelerated vesting of all of his then outstanding unvested equity awards, including awards that would otherwise vest only upon satisfaction of performance criteria; and (iv) reimbursement for premiums paid for continued health benefits for Dr. Anagnost and his eligible dependents until the earlier of 18 months following termination or the date Dr. Anagnost becomes covered under similar health plans.
Retirement Agreement with Pascal W. Di Fronzo
On May 21, 2021, Pascal W. Di Fronzo informed the Company of his intention to retire as Executive Vice President, Corporate Affairs, Chief Legal Officer & Secretary, after nearly 23 years of service to the Company, the last 15 of which as the Company’s general counsel. Mr. Di Fronzo and Autodesk entered a Qualified Retirement Agreement with his last day at the Company being on December 3, 2021. On November 29, 2021, Mr. Di Fronzo and the Company agreed that he would remain with the Company until May 9, 2022. Pursuant to an Amended Qualified Retirement Agreement dated as of November 29, 2021, Mr. Di Fronzo received the benefits to which an Eligible Employee is entitled for a Qualified Retirement, each as defined in the Autodesk, Inc. Amended and Restated Severance Plan and Summary Plan Description as well as $467,030 in payments for foregone benefits. Besides the benefits included under the Amended Qualified Retirement Agreement, Mr. Di Fronzo did not receive any cash-based annual incentive awards for fiscal year 2023 or annual long-term incentive grants in fiscal year 2023.
Retirement Provisions in RSU and PSU Agreements
The RSU and PSU agreements entered into with our executive officers in March 2019 and after contain provisions that permit partial continued vesting of outstanding RSUs and PSUs following a qualified retirement, as follows:
•Time-based RSUs that would otherwise vest within 12 months following the qualified retirement will fully accelerate and become vested as of the date of the qualified retirement, and any time-based RSUs that remain
56 | AUTODESK, INC.
unvested after application of this provision will immediately be forfeited and cancelled for no additional consideration upon the qualified retirement; and
•PSUs that would otherwise vest within 12 months following the qualified retirement will continue to vest as if the executive officer had remained continuously employed by Autodesk through the vest date next following the qualified retirement, based on the extent, if any, that the underlying performance criteria with respect to such awards are satisfied for the applicable performance period, and the remainder of such PSUs that do not become vested pursuant to this provision, if any, shall be forfeited and canceled for no additional consideration.
For the purposes of this provision, “qualified retirement” has the same definition as in the Severance Plan. Unless waived by the administrator of the applicable stock plan, in order for such voluntary termination to be deemed a qualified retirement, one must properly deliver written notice of his or her intent to resign from employment with Autodesk in a qualified retirement at least three months prior to the effective date of such qualified retirement.
Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control
The tables below list the estimated amount of compensation payable to each of the named executive officers in the event of voluntary termination, involuntary not-for-cause termination, for-cause termination, termination following a change in control, and termination in the event of disability or death of the executive. The amounts shown assume that such termination was effective as of January 31, 2023, and include all components of compensation, benefits, and perquisites payable under the Severance Plan and Executive Change in Control Program effective during the 2023 fiscal year or, in the case of Dr. Anagnost, pursuant to his employment agreement, discussed above.
Estimated amounts for share-based compensation are based on the closing price of our common stock on the Nasdaq on Monday, January 31, 2022, which was $215.16 per share. The actual amounts for all named executive officers to be paid out can only be determined at the time of such executive’s separation.
Andrew Anagnost
| Executive Benefits and Payments | Voluntary Termination on 1/31/2023 ($) | Involuntary Not For Cause or Voluntary for Good Reason (Except Change in Control) Termination on 1/31/2023 ($) | For Cause Termination on 1/31/2023 ($) | Involuntary Not for Cause or Voluntary For Good Reason (Change in Control) Termination on 1/31/2023 ($) | Disability on 1/31/2023 ($) | Death on 1/31/2023 ($) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Compensation: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Severance (1) | — | 2,080,000 | — | 5,200,000 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Pro-Rata Target Bonus (2) | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Equity Awards (3) | 17,382,776 | 23,959,357 | — | 34,329,423 | 34,329,423 | 34,329,423 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Benefits and perquisites: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Health Insurance (4) | — | 32,364 | — | 48,545 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Disability Income (5) | — | — | — | — | 1,831,184 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Accidental Death or Dismemberment (6) | — | — | — | — | 2,000,000 | 2,000,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Life Insurance (7) | — | — | — | — | — | 2,000,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total Executive Benefits and Payments Upon Separation | 17,382,776 | 26,071,721 | — | 39,577,968 | 38,160,607 | 38,329,423 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2023 Proxy Statement | 57
Deborah L. Clifford
| Executive Benefits and Payments | Voluntary Termination on 1/31/2023 ($) | Involuntary Not For Cause or Voluntary for Good Reason (Except Change in Control) Termination on 1/31/2023 ($) | For Cause Termination on 1/31/2023 ($) | Involuntary Not for Cause or Voluntary For Good Reason (Change in Control) Termination on 1/31/2023 ($) | Disability on 1/31/2023 ($) | Death on 1/31/2023 ($) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Compensation: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Severance (1) | — | 1,640,625 | — | 1,640,625 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Pro-Rata Target Bonus (2) | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Equity Awards (3) | — | 4,281,469 | — | 8,805,853 | 8,805,853 | 8,805,853 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Benefits and perquisites: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Health Insurance (4) | — | 6,007 | — | 4,870 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Disability Income (5) | — | — | — | — | 2,853,009 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Accidental Death or Dismemberment (6) | — | — | — | — | 625,000 | 625,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Life Insurance (7) | — | — | — | — | — | 625,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total Executive Benefits and Payments Upon Separation | — | 5,928,101 | — | 10,451,348 | 12,283,862 | 10,055,853 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Steven M. Blum
| Executive Benefits and Payments | Voluntary Termination on 1/31/2023 ($) | Involuntary Not For Cause or Voluntary for Good Reason (Except Change in Control) Termination on 1/31/2023 ($) | For Cause Termination on 1/31/2023 ($) | Involuntary Not for Cause or Voluntary For Good Reason (Change in Control) Termination on 1/31/2023 ($) | Disability on 1/31/2023 ($) | Death on 1/31/2023 ($) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Compensation: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Severance (1) | 1,837,500 | 1,837,500 | — | 1,837,500 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Pro-Rata Target Bonus (2) | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Equity Awards (3) | 6,028,998 | 6,028,998 | — | 12,493,265 | 12,493,265 | 12,493,265 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Benefits and perquisites: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Health Insurance (4) | 59,605 | 39,737 | — | 36,151 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Disability Income (5) | — | — | — | — | 1,789,827 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Accidental Death or Dismemberment (6) | — | — | — | — | 2,000,000 | 2,000,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Life Insurance (7) | — | — | — | — | — | 2,000,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total Executive Benefits and Payments Upon Separation | 7,926,103 | 7,906,235 | — | 14,366,916 | 16,283,092 | 16,493,265 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
58 | AUTODESK, INC.
Ruth Ann Keene
| Executive Benefits and Payments | Voluntary Termination on 1/31/2023 ($) | Involuntary Not For Cause or Voluntary for Good Reason (Except Change in Control) Termination on 1/31/2023 ($) | For Cause Termination on 1/31/2023 ($) | Involuntary Not for Cause or Voluntary For Good Reason (Change in Control) Termination on 1/31/2023 ($) | Disability on 1/31/2023 ($) | Death on 1/31/2023 ($) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Compensation: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Severance (1) | — | 1,391,250 | — | 1,391,250 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Pro-Rata Target Bonus (2) | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Equity Awards (3) | — | 6,589,275 | — | 13,865,126 | 13,865,126 | 13,865,126 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Benefits and perquisites: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Health Insurance (4) | — | 39,740 | — | 32,219 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Disability Income (5) | — | — | — | — | 2,374,366 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Accidental Death or Dismemberment (6) | — | — | — | — | 1,590,000 | 1,590,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Life Insurance (7) | — | — | — | — | — | 1,590,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total Executive Benefits and Payments Upon Separation | — | 8,020,265 | — | 15,288,595 | 17,829,492 | 17,045,126 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rebecca Pearce (8)
| Executive Benefits and Payments | Voluntary Termination on 1/31/2023 ($) | Involuntary Not For Cause or Voluntary for Good Reason (Except Change in Control) Termination on 1/31/2023 ($) | For Cause Termination on 1/31/2023 ($) | Involuntary Not for Cause or Voluntary For Good Reason (Change in Control) Termination on 1/31/2023 ($) | Disability on 1/31/2023 ($) | Death on 1/31/2023 ($) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Compensation: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Severance (1) | — | 1,000,913 | — | 1,000,913 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Pro-Rata Target Bonus (2) | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Equity Awards (3) | — | 2,451,963 | — | 5,024,631 | 5,024,631 | 5,024,631 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Benefits and perquisites: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Health Insurance (4) | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Disability Income (5) | — | — | — | — | 4,847,839 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Accidental Death or Dismemberment (6) | — | — | — | — | — | 1,900,089 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Life Insurance (7) | — | — | — | — | — | 1,900,089 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total Executive Benefits and Payments Upon Separation | — | 3,452,876 | — | 6,025,544 | 9,872,470 | 8,824,809 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
______________
(1)Severance: For Dr. Anagnost, the amounts shown would be paid in accordance with his employment agreement as amended on April 27, 2022 based on base salary and target bonus in effect at January 31, 2023. For the other continuing named executive officers, the amounts shown would be paid in accordance with the Severance Plan in effect at January 31, 2023 or Executive Change in Control Program as amended on April 27, 2022 based on base salary and target bonus in effect at January 31, 2023.
(2)Pro-Rata Target Bonus: Represents pro-rata target bonus amounts for the year in which the termination occurred, which is payable under Dr. Anagnost’s employment agreement and the Executive Change in Control Program, each as amended on April 27, 2022. No amount is payable for the named executive officers who participated in the bonus to equity exchange
2023 Proxy Statement | 59
program.
(3)Equity Awards: Pursuant to Autodesk's form of RSU and PSU award agreement, in the case of a Qualified Retirement, partial continued vesting of outstanding RSUs and PSUs continues, and in the case of Disability or Death, unvested time-based RSUs vest in full and unvested PSUs vest at target. For Dr. Anagnost, the amounts shown for other termination scenarios reflect the value of unvested equity awards accelerated in accordance with his employment agreement as amended on April 27, 2022. For the other continuing named executive officers, the amounts shown for other termination scenarios reflect the value of unvested equity awards accelerated in accordance with the Severance Plan in effect at January 31, 2023 or Executive Change in Control Program as amended on April 27, 2022. Reported values are based on the closing price of our common stock on January 31, 2023 ($215.16 per share) for RSUs and PSUs and target PSUs.
(4)Health Insurance: For Dr. Anagnost, in accordance with his employment agreement as amended on April 27, 2022, these amounts represent the cost of continuing coverage for Dr. Anagnost and his dependents. The amount shown in the Involuntary Not for Cause or Voluntary for Good Reason (Except Change in Control) Termination column reflects 12 months of coverage after separation. The amounts in the Involuntary Not for Cause or Voluntary for Good Reason (Change in Control) Termination column reflect 18 months of coverage after separation. For the other continuing named executive officers, these amounts represent the cost of continuing coverage for medical and dental benefits for each executive and his or her dependents (i) in the case of the Disability column, for 12 months in accordance with Autodesk's benefits program, (ii) in the case of the Involuntary Not for Cause or Voluntary for Good Reason (Except Change in Control) Termination column, for 12 months after separation and grossed up for taxes in accordance with the Severance Plan in effect at January 31, 2023, and (iii) in the case of the Involuntary Not for Cause or Voluntary for Good Reason (Change in Control) Termination column, for 18 months after separation in accordance with the Executive Change in Control Program as amended on April 27, 2022.
(5)Disability Income: Reflects the estimated present value of all future payments to each executive, except for Ms. Pearce, under his or her elected disability program, which represent 100% of base salary for the first 90 days, and then 662/3% of salary thereafter, with a maximum of $20,000 per month, until the age of 67. Ms. Pearce’s elected disability program represents 75% of base salary, plus average of bonus earnings over the last three fiscal years, minus state incapacity benefit, each year until the retirement age of 65. These payments would be made by the insurance provider, not by Autodesk.
(6)Accidental Death or Dismemberment: Reflects the lump-sum amount payable to each executive or his or her beneficiaries by Autodesk’s insurance provider in the event of the executive’s accidental death. There is also a prorated lump sum payment for dismemberment. The amount shown as payable upon dismemberment is based upon the payout for the most severe dismemberment under the plan.
(7)Life Insurance: Reflects the lump-sum amount payable to beneficiaries by Autodesk’s insurance provider in the event of the executive’s death.
(8)Ms. Pearce’s cash severance and benefits are provided in British Pounds. These amounts represent the approximate dollar value of her base salary and other compensation converted to U.S. dollars using the British Pound to dollar exchange rate of 1.23, which represents an average for fiscal 2023.
Compensation of Directors
During fiscal year 2023, our non-employee directors were eligible to receive the annual compensation set forth below:
| Member of the Board of Directors | $75,000 and RSUs ($250,000 equivalent) | |||||||
| Non-executive Chair of the Board | an additional | $75,000 | ||||||
| Chair of the Audit Committee | an additional | $25,000 | ||||||
| Chair of the Compensation and Human Resources Committee | an additional | $20,000 | ||||||
| Chair of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee | an additional | $10,000 | ||||||
The annual compensation cycle for non-employee directors begins on the date of the annual stockholders’ meeting and ends on the date of the next annual stockholders meeting (“Directors’ Compensation Cycle”). Director compensation in the tables below represent the portion of annual compensation with respect to service during Autodesk's fiscal year 2023.
No later than December 31 of the year prior to a director’s re-election to the Board, the director can elect to receive up to 100% of his or her annual fees in the form of RSUs issued at a rate of $1.20 worth of stock for each $1.00 of cash compensation foregone (“Elected RSUs”). If cash is elected, cash compensation is accrued monthly and paid quarterly, in arrears. The Elected RSUs are issued at the beginning of the Directors’ Compensation Cycle on the date of the annual meeting of stockholders and vest on the date of the annual meeting of stockholders in the following year, provided that the recipient is a director on such date.
60 | AUTODESK, INC.
Non-Employee Director Annual Compensation Cycle June 16, 2022 Annual Stockholder Meeting - June 16, 2023 Annual Stockholder Meeting | ||||||||||||||
| Director | % Annual Fees Elected to Convert to RSUs (June 17, 2021 - June 16, 2022) | % Annual Fees Elected to Convert to RSUs (June 17, 2022 - June 16, 2023) | ||||||||||||
| Stacy J. Smith | 100 | 100 | ||||||||||||
| Karen Blasing | 40 | 100 | ||||||||||||
| Reid French | 100 | 100 | ||||||||||||
Dr. Ayanna Howard | 100 | — | ||||||||||||
| Blake Irving | 100 | 100 | ||||||||||||
| Mary T. McDowell | 100 | 100 | ||||||||||||
| Stephen Milligan | 100 | 100 | ||||||||||||
| Lorrie M. Norrington | 100 | 100 | ||||||||||||
| Betsy Rafael | — | — | ||||||||||||
| Rami Rahim | N/A | — | ||||||||||||
During fiscal year 2023, Autodesk’s 2012 Outside Directors’ Stock Plan provided for the automatic grant of RSUs to our non-employee directors (except for Mr. Rahim). Starting in August 2022 (including Mr. Rahim’s Fiscal Year 2023 grant), RSUs are granted automatically to non-employee directors pursuant to the Director Compensation Policy and under the 2022 Equity Incentive Plan. Upon being elected or appointed to our Board, each non-employee director would be provided an initial grant of RSUs with a grant date value of $250,000 and prorated based on service on the date such director joined the Board (“Initial RSUs”), with subsequent annual grants of RSUs with a grant date value of $250,000 on the date of the annual meeting (“Subsequent Annual RSUs”).
| The number of calendar days from the Date of Grant to Autodesk’s next annual meeting of stockholders | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Fair Market Value of a Share on the Date of Grant | Result is rounded down to the nearest whole number of shares | |||||||||||||||||||
| $250,000 | x | / | = | |||||||||||||||||
| 365 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Initial RSUs vest upon the annual meeting of stockholders following the date of grant. Subsequent Annual RSUs vest over a one-year period. If a non-employee director is appointed on the date of an annual meeting, such non-employee director is not eligible to an Initial RSU.
Under the prior 2012 Outside Directors’ Stock Plan and the new 2022 Equity Incentive Plan, directors may elect to defer all or part of their Subsequent Annual RSUs and Elected RSUs. Distributions of these deferred RSUs will be made in shares of Autodesk’s common stock in annual installments or by lump sum in accordance with the distribution election made by the director.
The tables below present information concerning the compensation paid by us to each of our non-employee directors for fiscal year 2023. Dr. Anagnost, who was an Autodesk employee during fiscal year 2023, did not receive additional compensation for his service as a director.
| Current Directors | Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($) (1) | Stock Awards ($) (2) | Total ($) | |||||||||||||||||
| Stacy J. Smith | 150,000 | 279,992 | 429,992 | |||||||||||||||||
| Karen Blasing | 75,000 | 261,589 | 336,589 | |||||||||||||||||
| Reid French | 75,000 | 265,002 | 340,002 | |||||||||||||||||
| Dr. Ayanna Howard | 75,000 | 255,596 | 330,596 | |||||||||||||||||
| Blake Irving | 75,000 | 265,002 | 340,002 | |||||||||||||||||
| Mary T. McDowell | 95,000 | 269,006 | 364,006 | |||||||||||||||||
| Stephen Milligan | 75,000 | 265,002 | 340,002 | |||||||||||||||||
| Lorrie M. Norrington | 85,000 | 266,952 | 351,952 | |||||||||||||||||
| Betsy Rafael | 100,000 | 249,909 | 349,909 | |||||||||||||||||
| Rami Rahim | 14,672 | 91,658 | 106,330 | |||||||||||||||||
______________
2023 Proxy Statement | 61
(1)Fees Earned or Paid in Cash reflects the dollar amounts of fees earned. As noted above, during fiscal year 2023, directors could elect to receive up to 100% of their compensation in the form of RSUs in lieu of cash. The following table represents actual cash received by the directors in fiscal year 2023 based on their elections. See footnote (b) for more information regarding the RSUs granted in lieu of cash.
| Current Directors | Fees Actually Paid in Cash ($) | |||||||
| Stacy J. Smith | — | |||||||
| Karen Blasing | 22,500 | |||||||
| Reid French | — | |||||||
| Dr. Ayanna Howard | 37,500 | |||||||
| Blake Irving | — | |||||||
| Mary T. McDowell | — | |||||||
| Stephen Milligan | — | |||||||
| Lorrie M. Norrington | — | |||||||
| Betsy Rafael | 100,000 | |||||||
| Rami Rahim | 14,470 | |||||||
(2)The Stock Awards column reflects (i) the grant date fair value of the Initial RSUs and Subsequent Annual RSUs and (ii) the pro-rata grant date fair value of 20% of the stock awards the directors earned during fiscal year 2023 in lieu of cash. The 20% represents the premium of $1.20 worth of stock for each $1.00 of cash compensation foregone. The assumptions used in the valuation of these awards are set forth in Note 1, “Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 14, 2023. These amounts do not correspond to the actual value that will be realized by the directors upon the vesting of RSUs or the sale of the common stock underlying such awards.
The following table shows the total amounts and fair values, as well as the 20% premium, of RSUs granted on June 16, 2021, in lieu of cash foregone for the June 17, 2021, through June 16, 2022, Directors’ Compensation Cycle:
| Restricted Stock Unit | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Current Directors | Total Number of Shares (#) | Number of Shares Representing the 20% Premium (#) | Grant Date Fair Value of Stock Awards ($) | Grant Date Fair Value of the 20% Premium of the Stock Awards ($) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Stacy J. Smith | 756 | 126 | 179,981 | 29,997 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Karen Blasing | 75 | 12 | 17,855 | 2,857 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Reid French | 378 | 63 | 89,990 | 14,998 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Dr. Ayanna Howard | 378 | 63 | 89,990 | 14,998 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Blake Irving | 378 | 63 | 89,990 | 14,998 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mary T. McDowell | 478 | 79 | 113,797 | 18,808 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Stephen Milligan | 378 | 63 | 89,990 | 14,998 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lorrie M. Norrington | 428 | 71 | 101,894 | 16,903 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Betsy Rafael | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||
62 | AUTODESK, INC.
The following table shows the total amounts and fair values, as well as the 20% premium, of RSUs granted on June 16, 2022, in lieu of cash foregone for the June 17, 2022, through June 16, 2023, Directors’ Compensation Cycle:
| Restricted Stock Unit | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Current Directors | Total Number of Shares (#) | Number of Shares Representing the 20% Premium (#) | Grant Date Fair Value of Stock Awards ($) | Grant Date Fair Value of the 20% Premium of the Stock Awards ($) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Stacy J. Smith | 1,095 | 183 | 179,919 | 30,069 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Karen Blasing | 547 | 92 | 89,878 | 15,117 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Reid French | 547 | 92 | 89,878 | 15,117 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Dr. Ayanna Howard | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Blake Irving | 547 | 92 | 89,878 | 15,117 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mary T. McDowell | 693 | 116 | 113,867 | 19,060 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Stephen Milligan | 547 | 92 | 89,878 | 15,117 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lorrie M. Norrington | 620 | 104 | 101,872 | 17,088 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Betsy Rafael | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rami Rahim | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||
The following tables show the total amounts and fair values of Subsequent Annual RSUs and Initial RSUs granted during fiscal year 2023.
| Restricted Stock Unit | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Current Directors | Grant Date(s) | Number of Shares (#) | Grant Date Fair Value of Stock Awards ($) | |||||||||||||||||
| Stacy J. Smith | 6/16/2022 | 1,521 | 249,916 | |||||||||||||||||
| Karen Blasing | 6/16/2022 | 1,521 | 249,916 | |||||||||||||||||
| Reid French | 6/16/2022 | 1,521 | 249,916 | |||||||||||||||||
| Dr. Ayanna Howard | 6/16/2022 | 1,521 | 249,916 | |||||||||||||||||
| Blake Irving | 6/16/2022 | 1,521 | 249,916 | |||||||||||||||||
| Mary T. McDowell | 6/16/2022 | 1,521 | 249,916 | |||||||||||||||||
| Stephen Milligan | 6/16/2022 | 1,521 | 249,916 | |||||||||||||||||
| Lorrie M. Norrington | 6/16/2022 | 1,521 | 249,916 | |||||||||||||||||
| Betsy Rafael | 6/16/2022 | 1,521 | 249,916 | |||||||||||||||||
| Rami Rahim | 8/22/2022 | 959 | 207,528 | |||||||||||||||||
The aggregate number of each director’s RSUs outstanding at January 31, 2023, was:
| Current Directors | Aggregate Number of Shares Underlying Outstanding Restricted Stock Units | |||||||
| Stacy J. Smith | 2,616 | |||||||
| Karen Blasing | 2,068 | |||||||
| Reid French | 2,068 | |||||||
| Dr. Ayanna Howard | 1,521 | |||||||
| Blake Irving | 2,068 | |||||||
| Mary T. McDowell | 2,214 | |||||||
| Stephen Milligan | 2,068 | |||||||
| Lorrie M. Norrington | 2,141 | |||||||
| Betsy Rafael | 1,521 | |||||||
| Rami Rahim | 959 | |||||||
2023 Proxy Statement | 63
Director Stock Ownership Guidelines
The Board believes directors should have a meaningful financial stake in Autodesk in order to further align their interests with Autodesk’s stockholders. To that end, the Board has adopted mandatory ownership guidelines for the directors. These mandatory ownership guidelines require all directors to hold shares of Autodesk’s common stock equivalent in value to five times their annual cash retainer.
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
The following table sets forth certain information concerning the beneficial ownership of Autodesk’s common stock as of March 31, 2023, for each person or entity who is known by Autodesk to own beneficially more than 5% of the outstanding shares of Autodesk common stock, each of Autodesk’s directors (including the nominees for directors), each of the named executive officers, including former executive officers, and all directors and executive officers as a group.
| 5% Stockholders, Directors and Officers (1) | Common Stock Beneficially Owned (2) | Percentage Beneficially Owned (3) | ||||||||||||
| Principal Stockholders: | ||||||||||||||
The Vanguard Group, Inc. (4) | 18,340,299 | 8.5 | % | |||||||||||
BlackRock, Inc. (5) | 16,702,741 | 7.8 | % | |||||||||||
| Non-Employee Directors (6): | ||||||||||||||
Stacy J. Smith | 57,805 | * | ||||||||||||
Karen Blasing | 3,635 | * | ||||||||||||
Reid French (7) | 9,256 | * | ||||||||||||
Dr. Ayanna Howard | 189 | * | ||||||||||||
Blake Irving | 4,559 | * | ||||||||||||
Mary T. McDowell | 43,608 | * | ||||||||||||
Stephen Milligan (8) | 5,854 | * | ||||||||||||
Lorrie M. Norrington | 7,704 | * | ||||||||||||
Betsy Rafael | 3,294 | * | ||||||||||||
| Rami Rahim | — | * | ||||||||||||
| Named Executive Officers: | ||||||||||||||
Andrew Anagnost | 58,200 | * | ||||||||||||
Deborah L. Clifford | 9,918 | * | ||||||||||||
Steven M. Blum (9) | 54,622 | * | ||||||||||||
Ruth Ann Keene | 42,364 | * | ||||||||||||
Rebecca Pearce | 6,386 | * | ||||||||||||
| Former Executive Officer | ||||||||||||||
Pascal W. Di Fronzo | 8,311 | * | ||||||||||||
| All directors and executive officers as a group (15 individuals) | 307,394 | * | ||||||||||||
_______________
* Represents less than one percent (1%) of the outstanding common stock.
(1)Unless otherwise indicated in their respective footnote, the address for each listed person is c/o Autodesk, Inc., One Market Street, Ste. 400, San Francisco, California 94105.
(2)The number and percentage of shares beneficially owned is determined in accordance with Rule 13d-3 of the Exchange Act, and the information is not necessarily indicative of beneficial ownership for any other purpose. Under Rule 13d-3, beneficial ownership includes any shares the individual or entity has the right to acquire within 60 days of March 31, 2023, through the exercise of any stock option or other right. Unless otherwise indicated in the footnotes, each person or entity has sole voting and investment power (or shares such powers with his or her spouse) with respect to the shares shown as beneficially owned.
(3)The total number of shares of common stock outstanding as of March 31, 2023, was 215,025,501.
(4)As of December 31, 2022, the reporting date of The Vanguard Group, Inc.’s most recent filing with the SEC pursuant to Section 13(g) of the Exchange Act filed on February 9, 2023, The Vanguard Group, Inc. was deemed to have sole dispositive power with respect to 17,431,061 shares, shared voting power with respect to 322,014 shares, and shared
64 | AUTODESK, INC.
dispositive power with respect to 909,238 shares. The address of The Vanguard Group, Inc. is 100 Vanguard Blvd., Malvern, PA 19355.
(5)As of December 31, 2022, the reporting date of BlackRock, Inc.’s most recent filing with the SEC pursuant to Section 13(g) of the Exchange Act filed on February 7, 2023, BlackRock, Inc. was deemed to have sole voting power with respect to 14,901,618 shares, sole dispositive power with respect to 16,702,741 shares. The address of BlackRock, Inc. is 55 East 52nd Street, New York, NY 10055.
(6)Directors’ holdings reported include vested awards deferred under our 2012 Outside Directors’ Stock Plan.
(7)Includes 20 shares held indirectly by trust.
(8)Includes 5,854 shares held indirectly by trust.
(9)Includes 54,205 shares held indirectly by trust.
Equity Compensation Plan Information
The following table summarizes the number of outstanding options and awards granted to employees and directors, as well as the number of securities remaining available for future issuance under these plans as of January 31, 2023:
| (a) | (b) | (c) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Plan category | Number of securities to be issued upon exercise or vesting of outstanding options and awards (in millions) | Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options | Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a)) (in millions) (2) | |||||||||||||||||
| Equity compensation plans approved by security holders (1) | 5 | $ | 21.03 | 26 | ||||||||||||||||
| Total | 5 | $ | 21.03 | 26 | ||||||||||||||||
______________
(1)Includes employee and director stock plans set forth in Note 4, "Equity Compensation" in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 14, 2023.
(2)Included in this amount are 5 million securities available for future issuance under Autodesk’s Employee Stock Purchase Plan.
Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our directors and executive officers, and persons who own more than 10% of a registered class of our equity securities, to file reports of ownership on Form 3 and changes in ownership on Form 4 or 5 with the SEC. Such executive officers, directors, and stockholders also are required by SEC rules to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms that they file.
Based solely on our review of the copies of such reports furnished to us and written representations that no other reports were required to be filed, we believe that all reports were filed on a timely basis, except one Form 4 to report the vesting of restricted stock units was filed late on behalf of Dr. Ayanna Howard, and one Form 4 to report the grant of restricted stock units was filed late on behalf of each of Dr. Andrew Anagnost, Steven Blum, Deborah Clifford, Stephen Hope, Ruth Ann Keene, and Rebecca Pearce as a result of an unintentional administrative error by Autodesk.
2023 Proxy Statement | 65
Report of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors
The Audit Committee is a committee of the Board consisting solely of independent directors as required by the listing standards of the Nasdaq and rules of the SEC. The Audit Committee operates under a written charter approved by the Board, which is available on Autodesk's website at www.autodesk.com under “Investor Relations - ESG - Corporate Governance.” The composition of the Audit Committee, the attributes of its members, and the responsibilities of the Audit Committee, as reflected in its charter, are intended to be in accordance with applicable requirements for corporate audit committees. The Audit Committee reviews and assesses the adequacy of its charter and the Audit Committee’s performance on an annual basis.
As described more fully in its charter, the Audit Committee’s role includes the oversight of our financial, accounting and reporting processes; our system of internal accounting and financial controls; and oversight of the management of risks associated with Autodesk’s financial reporting, accounting and auditing matters. The Audit Committee is directly responsible for the selection, appointment, compensation, engagement, retention, termination, and services of our independent registered public accounting firm, Ernst & Young LLP (“EY”), including conducting a review of its independence; reviewing and approving the planned scope of our annual audit; overseeing EY’s audit work; reviewing and pre-approving any audit and permissible non-audit services and fees that may be performed by EY; reviewing with management and EY the adequacy of our system of internal financial and disclosure controls; reviewing our critical accounting policies and the application of accounting principles; monitoring the rotation of EY partners on our audit engagement team as required by regulation; reviewing Autodesk’s treasury policies and tax positions; overseeing the performance of our internal audit function; and overseeing our management of cybersecurity risks relating to financial, accounting, and internal controls. The Audit Committee establishes and oversees Autodesk’s compliance with the procedures for handling complaints regarding accounting, internal accounting controls, or auditing matters, including procedures for confidential, anonymous submission of concerns by employees regarding accounting and auditing matters. The Audit Committee’s role also includes meeting to review our annual audited financial statements and quarterly financial statements with management and EY. The Audit Committee held nine meetings during fiscal year 2023. Management is responsible for the quarterly and annual financial statements and the reporting process, including the systems of internal controls. EY is responsible for expressing an opinion on the conformity of our audited financial statements with generally accepted accounting principles. Within this context, the Audit Committee reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements for fiscal year 2023 with management and EY.
The Audit Committee has received the written disclosures and letter from EY required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (the “PCAOB”) regarding EY’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, has discussed with EY the independence of that firm, and has considered whether the provision of non-audit services was compatible with maintaining the independence of that firm. In addition, the Audit Committee has discussed with EY the matters required to be discussed by the applicable requirements of the PCAOB. The Audit Committee also discussed with management and with EY the evaluation of Autodesk’s internal controls and the effectiveness of Autodesk’s internal control over financial reporting, as required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
The Audit Committee discussed with Autodesk’s internal and independent auditors the overall scope and plans for their respective audits. In addition, the Audit Committee met with the internal and the independent auditors, with and without management present, on a regular basis in fiscal year 2023 and discussed the results of their examinations and the overall quality of Autodesk’s financial reporting.
On the basis of these reviews and discussions, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board (and the Board has approved) that Autodesk’s audited financial statements be included in Autodesk’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2023, for filing with the SEC.
| AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS | ||
| Betsy Rafael (Chair) | ||
| Karen Blasing | ||
| Dr. Ayanna Howard | ||
| Stephen Milligan | ||
66 | AUTODESK, INC.
Proposal One: Election of Directors
Autodesk's Bylaws permit our Board to establish by resolution the authorized number of directors; currently, eleven directors are authorized. Accordingly, upon the recommendation of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, the Board has nominated eleven individuals to be elected at the Annual Meeting. All of the nominees are presently directors of Autodesk and have consented to being named in this Proxy Statement and serving as directors if elected. Unless otherwise instructed, the proxy holders will vote the proxies received by them for the eleven nominees named below. Your proxy cannot be voted for more than eleven director candidates.
A majority of the votes cast is required for the election of each director.
____________________________________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” THE NOMINEES LISTED BELOW.
____________________________________________________________________________________________
| Name | Age | Director Since | Principal Occupation | ||||||||
Andrew Anagnost | 58 | 2017 | President and Chief Executive Officer, Autodesk, Inc. | ||||||||
Stacy J. Smith | 60 | 2011 | Executive Chairman, Kioxia Corporation | ||||||||
Karen Blasing | 66 | 2018 | Former Chief Financial Officer, Guidewire Software, Inc. | ||||||||
Reid French | 51 | 2017 | Former Chief Executive Officer, Applied Systems, Inc. | ||||||||
Dr. Ayanna Howard | 51 | 2019 | Dean of the College of Engineering at The Ohio State University; CTO, Co-founder, Zyrobotics | ||||||||
Blake Irving | 63 | 2019 | Former Chief Executive Officer, GoDaddy Inc. | ||||||||
Mary T. McDowell | 58 | 2010 | Former Chief Executive Officer, Mitel Networks Corporation | ||||||||
Stephen Milligan | 59 | 2018 | Former Chief Executive Officer, Western Digital Corporation | ||||||||
Lorrie M. Norrington | 63 | 2011 | Adviser and Operating Partner, Lead Edge Capital Management, LLC | ||||||||
Betsy Rafael | 61 | 2013 | Former Chief Transformation Officer, GoDaddy Inc. | ||||||||
Rami Rahim | 52 | 2022 | Chief Executive Officer of Juniper Networks, Inc. | ||||||||
2023 Proxy Statement | 67
Proposal Two: Ratification of the Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Audit Committee has selected Ernst & Young LLP (“EY”) as the independent registered public accounting firm to audit the consolidated financial statements of Autodesk for the fiscal year ending January 31, 2024, and recommends that the stockholders vote to ratify that appointment. In the event of a negative vote on this proposal, the Audit Committee will reconsider its selection. Even if the selection of EY is ratified, the Audit Committee, in its discretion, may direct the selection of a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time if the Audit Committee determines that such a change would be in the best interests of Autodesk and its stockholders.
EY has been retained as our independent registered public accounting firm continuously since the fiscal year ended January 31, 1983. We expect a representative of EY to be present at the Annual Meeting. The representative will have the opportunity to make a statement if he or she desires to do so and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.
The affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote are required to ratify the appointment of EY as Autodesk’s independent registered public accounting firm.
____________________________________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR”
THE RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP
AS OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM.
____________________________________________________________________________________________
Principal Accounting Fees and Services
The following table presents fees billed for professional audit services and other services rendered to Autodesk by EY and its affiliates for the fiscal years ended January 31, 2023 and 2022.
| Fiscal Year 2023 | Fiscal Year 2022 | |||||||||||||
| (in millions) | ||||||||||||||
| Audit Fees (1) | $ | 6.8 | $ | 8.3 | ||||||||||
| Audit-Related Fees (2) | 0.2 | 0.3 | ||||||||||||
| Tax Fees (3) | 0.2 | 0.3 | ||||||||||||
| All Other Fees (4) | 0.1 | 0.1 | ||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 7.3 | $ | 9.0 | ||||||||||
_________________
(1)Audit Fees consisted of fees billed for professional services rendered for the integrated audit of Autodesk’s annual financial statements and management’s report on internal controls included in Autodesk's Annual Reports on Form 10-K, for the review of the financial statements included in Autodesk’s Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, and for other services, including statutory audits and services rendered in connection with SEC filings.
(2)Audit-Related Fees consisted of fees for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements. This category includes fees arising from accounting-related consulting services.
(3)Tax Fees consisted of fees billed for tax compliance, consultation, and planning services.
(4)Other fees consisted of fees for permissible training programs, license compliance consultation services, and subscription fees for an online accounting research tool.
Pre-Approval of Audit and Non-Audit Services
Generally, all audit and non-audit services provided by EY and its affiliates to Autodesk must be pre-approved by the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee is presented with a detailed listing of the individual audit and non-audit services and fees (separately describing audit-related services, tax services, and other services) expected to be provided by EY and its affiliates during the year. The Audit Committee is also responsible for the audit fee
68 | AUTODESK, INC.
negotiations associated with Autodesk’s retention of EY. Periodically, the Audit Committee receives an update of all pre-approved audit and non-audit services conducted, and information regarding any new audit and non-audit services to be provided by EY and its affiliates. The Audit Committee reviews the update and approves the proposed services if they are deemed acceptable.
To ensure prompt handling of unexpected matters, the Chair of the Audit Committee has authority to amend or modify the list of approved audit and non-audit services and fees so long as such additional or amended services do not affect EY's independence under applicable SEC rules. The Chair reports any such action taken at subsequent Audit Committee meetings.
Rotation
The Audit Committee periodically reviews and evaluates the performance of EY’s lead audit partner, oversees the required rotation of the lead audit partner responsible for our audit, and reviews and considers the selection of the lead audit partner.
At this time, the Audit Committee and the Board believe that the continued retention of EY to serve as our independent registered public accounting firm is in the best interests of Autodesk and its stockholders.
2022 Proxy Statement | 69
Proposal Three: Non-Binding Vote to Approve Compensation for Named Executive Officers
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and Section 14A of the Exchange Act enable our stockholders to vote, on a non-binding advisory basis, to approve the compensation of our named executive officers as described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section and the accompanying compensation tables and narrative discussion in this Proxy Statement (a “Say-on-Pay” vote). Stockholders are encouraged to read that information in its entirety to obtain a complete understanding of our executive compensation program philosophy, design, and linkage to stockholder interests. Since 2011, we have held our Say-on-Pay vote every year. Under our policy of providing for annual votes, we expect that our next Say-on-Pay vote will occur at our 2023 Annual Stockholder Meeting.
Autodesk has designed its compensation programs to reward executives for producing strong results that are aligned with the interests of our stockholders. We emphasize variable long-term and “at-risk” compensation dependent upon prospective financial, strategic, and stock price performance and a retrospective assessment of Autodesk’s success to determine pay opportunities.
The affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote are required to approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers.
____________________________________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR”
THE ADVISORY PROPOSAL APPROVING NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION.
____________________________________________________________________________________________
Stockholder Engagement on Executive Compensation
Autodesk and the Committee value the input of our stockholders. The Committee carefully considers stockholder feedback as part of its ongoing review of our executive compensation programs, design, and metrics, and this feedback has informed changes the Committee has made in recent years to align our programs with our business transformation. At the 2022 Annual Meeting, 92.4% of the votes cast on our say-on-pay proposal were favorable, reflecting strong stockholder support for our executive compensation programs. In fiscal year 2023, members of our management team and, in certain instances, independent members of our Board continued our regular outreach and contacted stockholders representing approximately 51% of our outstanding shares. Our management team, and in some cases our independent Chair, met with representatives from active and passive funds to discuss strategy, our executive and employee compensation programs, workforce diversity, board composition and skill sets, sustainability, and a broad range of other ESG issues. This outreach enabled us to gather feedback from a significant cross-section of Autodesk’s stockholder base. Based on these discussions, the Committee found that our stockholders continued to be supportive of our executive compensation programs and the alignment between executive pay and Autodesk’s performance. Additionally, our stockholders did not request any pay related changes, which supported our decision to maintain the overall design of our executive compensation program.
Compensation Guiding Principles
The Committee believes that Autodesk’s executive compensation program should be designed to attract, motivate, and retain talented executives and should provide a rigorous framework that is tied to stockholder returns, company performance, long-term strategic corporate goals, and individual performance. The general compensation objectives are to:
•Recruit and retain the highest caliber of executives through competitive rewards;
•Motivate executive officers to achieve business and financial goals;
•Balance rewards for short- and long-term performance; and
•Align rewards with stockholder value creation.
70 | AUTODESK
Within this framework, the total compensation for each executive officer varies based on multiple dimensions:
•Whether Autodesk achieves its short-term and long-term financial and non-financial objectives;
•Autodesk’s TSR relative to companies in the North American Technology Software Index;
•The specific roles and responsibilities of the officer;
•Each individual officer’s skills, capabilities, contributions, and performance;
•Internal pay alignment considerations; and
•Retention considerations.
Our executive compensation program emphasizes variable compensation with both annual and long-term performance components. In fiscal year 2023, our CEO elected to forego his annual cash incentive award and receive performance share units instead, as eligible under the Bonus to Equity Exchange Program. As a result, 59% of our CEO’s total compensation in fiscal year 2023 consisted of performance-based equity awards. In total 95% of our CEO’s compensation was variable and linked to our financial and stock performance. In fiscal year 2023, our other NEOs also elected to participate in the bonus to equity exchange program. As a result, 57% of other NEOs’ total compensation in fiscal year 2023 consisted of performance-based equity awards. In total 90% of other NEOs’ total compensation was variable in nature and “at risk”. Our incentive programs reward strong annual financial and operational performance, as well as relative TSR over one-, two-, and three-year performance periods. The charts below illustrate the fiscal year 2023 pay mix between base salary and targeted short- and long-term equity compensation for our CEO and all other NEOs.
2023 Proxy Statement | 71
Leading Compensation Governance Practices
Autodesk’s executive compensation objectives are supported by policies and strong governance practices that align executives’ interests with the interests of our stockholders. Some of the program’s most notable features are highlighted in the table below and summarized in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis.
| What We Do | What We Do Not Do | |||||||||||||
| a | Engage in robust stockholder outreach | x | Allow hedging, pledging, or trading in Autodesk derivative securities | |||||||||||
| a | Tie a significant percentage of NEO total pay to achievement of critical financial and stockholder value creation | x | Reprice stock options | |||||||||||
| a | Employ maximum payouts on performance-based cash and equity incentive compensation | x | Offer executive benefits and excessive perquisites | |||||||||||
| a | Require significant stock ownership requirements | x | Use fixed-term employment agreements | |||||||||||
| a | Include a clawback policy in incentive programs | |||||||||||||
| a | Provide double-trigger change in control arrangements with no excise tax gross-up | |||||||||||||
| a | Ensure effective risk management | |||||||||||||
| a | Rely on an independent compensation committee and engage an independent compensation consultant | |||||||||||||
72 | AUTODESK, INC.
Proposal Four: Non-Binding Vote on the Frequency of Executive Compensation Votes
Background and Purpose
We are providing our stockholders with an opportunity to vote, on a non-binding advisory basis, on how frequently we should seek a non-binding vote on the compensation of our named executive officers, such as Proposal Three beginning on page 70 of this Proxy Statement. By voting on this Proposal Four, stockholders may indicate whether they would prefer to vote on named executive officer compensation once every one, two or three years. This advisory vote on the frequency of the vote to approve named executive officer compensation must be submitted to stockholders at least once every six years.
After careful consideration, our Board has determined that a vote on executive compensation that occurs annually remains the most appropriate alternative for the Company, and therefore our Board recommends that you vote for a one-year interval for the vote on executive compensation.
We believe that an annual vote will continue to allow our stockholders the ability to frequently communicate to us their position on our approach to named executive officer compensation through an executive compensation vote. An annual vote is aligned with our short-term cash programs and the metrics that guide those programs as well as with our cycle of granting long-term equity compensation to our named executive officers. Our Compensation and Human Resources Committee is responsible for our named executive officer compensation programs and values our stockholders’ opinions. We understand that our stockholders may have different views as to what is the best approach for the Company, and we look forward to hearing from our stockholders on this proposal.
The option of one year, two years or three years that receives the highest number of votes cast by stockholders will be the frequency for the advisory vote on executive compensation that has been selected by stockholders. However, because this vote is advisory and not binding on the Company, the Board may decide that it is in the best interests of our stockholders and the Company to hold an advisory vote on executive compensation more or less frequently than the option approved by our stockholders.
____________________________________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS AN ANNUAL VOTE AS THE FREQUENCY
WITH WHICH STOCKHOLDERS ARE PROVIDED AN ADVISORY (NON-BINDING) VOTE
TO APPROVE NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION. THE OPTION RECEIVING
THE GREATEST NUMBER OF VOTES (EVERY ONE, TWO OR THREE YEARS) WILL BE
CONSIDERED THE FREQUENCY SELECTED BY STOCKHOLDERS.
____________________________________________________________________________________________
2023 Proxy Statement | 73
Information About the 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders
Location, Stock Ownership, Quorum, and Voting
Q: Where is the Annual Meeting?
___________________________________________________________________________________________
A: The Annual Meeting will be held in a virtual format only at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/ADSK2023. Autodesk stockholders will have the opportunity to listen to the meeting live, submit questions and vote online.
Q: Who is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting?
____________________________________________________________________________________________
A: Holders of record of Autodesk’s common stock, par value $0.01 per share, at the close of business on April 24, 2023 (the “Record Date”) are entitled to receive notice of and to vote their shares at the Annual Meeting. Beneficial owners at the close of business on the Record Date have the right to direct their broker, trustee, or nominee on how to vote their shares, as described below. Stockholders are entitled to cast one vote for each share of common stock they hold as of the Record Date.
As of the Record Date, there were 214,152,533 shares of common stock outstanding and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. No shares of Autodesk’s preferred stock were outstanding.
Our list of stockholders as of the Record Date will be available for inspection for the ten days prior to the Annual Meeting. If you want to inspect the stockholder list, email our Investor Relations department at investor.relations@autodesk.com to make arrangements.
Q: What is the difference between holding shares as a stockholder of record and as a beneficial owner?
____________________________________________________________________________________________
A: Stockholders of record. If your shares are registered directly in your name with Autodesk’s transfer agent, Computershare Investor Services LLC, you are considered the “stockholder of record” with respect to those shares. If you are a stockholder of record, Autodesk sent these proxy materials directly to you.
Beneficial owners. Most Autodesk stockholders hold their shares through a broker or other agent rather than directly in their own names. If your shares are held in a brokerage account or by a broker or other agent, you are considered the “beneficial owner” of shares held in “street name.” If you hold your shares in street name, these proxy materials have been forwarded to you by your broker or other agent. That entity is considered the stockholder of record with respect to those shares. As the beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your broker or other agent on how to vote your shares. Since a beneficial owner is not the stockholder of record, you may not vote these shares in person at the Annual Meeting without the control number on your Notice of Internet Availability, proxy card, or voting instruction form, or in the email sending you the Proxy Statement. You may contact your broker or other institution where you hold your account if you have questions about obtaining your control number.
Q: How many shares must be present or represented by proxy to conduct business at the Annual Meeting?
____________________________________________________________________________________________
A: The presence of the holders of a majority of the shares of common stock entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting is necessary to constitute a quorum. Stockholders are counted as present if they attend the Annual Meeting in person (virtually) or have properly submitted a proxy. Abstentions and “broker non-votes” are counted as present and entitled to vote and are therefore included for purposes of determining whether a quorum is present at the Annual Meeting.
74 | AUTODESK, INC.
Q: What are “broker non-votes”?
____________________________________________________________________________________________
A: Generally, if shares are held in street name, the beneficial owner is entitled to give voting instructions to the broker or other agent holding the shares. If the beneficial owner does not provide voting instructions, the broker or other agent can vote the shares with respect to matters that are considered “routine,” but not with respect to “non-routine” matters, resulting in a “broker non-vote.” Accordingly, if you own shares through a broker or other agent, please be sure to give voting instructions so your vote will be counted on all proposals that come before the Annual Meeting.
The ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending January 31, 2024 (Proposal Two) is considered routine under applicable rules, so there should not be any broker non-votes in connection with Proposal Two. The election of the eleven directors listed in the accompanying Proxy Statement (Proposal One), the advisory vote on executive compensation (Proposal Three) and the advisory vote on the frequency of executive compensation votes (Proposal Four) are considered non-routine matters, so there may be broker non-votes on Proposals One, Three and Four.
Q: How can I vote my shares during the Annual Meeting?
____________________________________________________________________________________________
A: Whether you hold shares in your name or in street name, you should follow the instructions at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/ADSK2023 to vote during the Annual Meeting.
Even if you plan to virtually attend the Annual Meeting, we recommend that you also submit your proxy card or follow the voting instructions described below to vote in advance of the meeting so that your vote will be counted if you later decide not to attend.
Q: How can I vote my shares without attending the Annual Meeting?
____________________________________________________________________________________________
A: If you are a stockholder of record, you may instruct the proxy holders how to vote your shares in one of three ways:
•by using the internet voting site listed on the proxy card and Notice,
•by calling the toll-free telephone number listed on the proxy card and Notice, or
•by requesting a proxy card from Autodesk by telephone at (415) 507-6373 or by email at investor.relations@autodesk.com, and completing, signing, dating, and returning the proxy card in the postage pre-paid envelope provided.
Proxy cards submitted by mail must be received by the time the Annual Meeting begins in order for the related shares to be voted. If you return a signed proxy card without giving specific voting instructions, your shares will be voted as recommended by the Board.
Specific instructions for using the telephone and internet voting systems are on the proxy card and Notice. The telephone and internet voting systems for stockholders of record will be available until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on June 20, 2023.
If you are a beneficial owner, you will receive instructions from your broker or other agent that you must follow in order to have your shares voted. These instructions will indicate if internet and telephone voting are available and, if so, how to access and use those methods.
2023 Proxy Statement | 75
Q: What is the voting requirement to approve these proposals?
____________________________________________________________________________________________
A: Proposal One. A majority of the votes duly cast is required for the election of each director. If the number of shares voted “for” a director nominee exceeds the number of votes cast “against,” the nominee will be elected as a director of Autodesk to serve until the next annual meeting or until his or her successor has been duly elected and qualified.
You may vote “for,” “against,” or “abstain” on each of the eleven nominees for election as director. Abstentions and broker non-votes will not affect the outcome of the election.
Proposal Two. The affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote are required to ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as Autodesk’s independent registered public accounting firm.
You may vote “for,” “against,” or “abstain” on this proposal. Abstentions are deemed to be votes cast and have the same effect as a vote against this proposal. However, broker non-votes are not deemed to be votes cast and are not included in the tabulation of the voting results on this proposal.
Proposal Three. The affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote are required to approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers.
You may vote “for,” “against,” or “abstain” on this proposal. Abstentions are deemed to be votes cast and have the same effect as a vote against this proposal. However, broker non-votes are not deemed to be votes cast and are not included in the tabulation of the voting results on this proposal.
Proposal Four. The option of “1 Year,” “2 Years,” or “3 Years” that receives the highest number of votes cast by stockholders will be the frequency for the advisory vote on named executive officer compensation recommended by stockholders.
You may vote for a vote every “1 Year,” “2 Years,” or “3 Years,” or may “abstain” from voting on this proposal. Abstentions and broker non-votes will not be included in the tabulation of the voting results on this proposal.
Q: What happens if I do not cast a vote?
____________________________________________________________________________________________
A: Stockholders of record. If you are a stockholder of record and you do not cast your vote, no votes will be cast on your behalf on any of the items of business at the Annual Meeting.
Beneficial owners. If you hold your shares in street name and you do not cast your vote, your broker, trustee, or nominee can use its discretion to vote on the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm (Proposal Two). However, you must cast your vote if you want it to count in any of: the election of directors (Proposal One), the non-binding approval of compensation for our named executive officers (Proposal Three) or the non-binding determination of the frequency of holding an advisory vote on named executive officer compensation (Proposal Four). Your broker may not vote your uninstructed shares with respect to Proposals One, Three and Four.
Q: How does the Board recommend that I vote?
____________________________________________________________________________________________
A: The Board unanimously recommends that you vote your shares FOR the election of each of the eleven nominees listed in Proposal One, FOR the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as Autodesk's independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending January 31, 2024, FOR the approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of our named executive officers, and 1 YEAR as the frequency of holding an advisory vote on named executive officer compensation.
76 | AUTODESK, INC.
Q: If I sign a proxy, how will it be voted?
____________________________________________________________________________________________
A: All shares entitled to vote and represented by properly executed proxy cards received prior to the Annual Meeting and not revoked before the polls are closed will be voted in accordance with the instructions on those proxy cards. If there are no instructions on an otherwise properly executed proxy card, the shares represented by that proxy card will be voted as recommended by the Board.
Q: What happens if additional matters are presented at the Annual Meeting?
____________________________________________________________________________________________
A: If any other matters are properly presented for consideration at the Annual Meeting, including, among other things, consideration of a motion to adjourn the Annual Meeting to another time or place (for the purpose of soliciting additional proxies or otherwise), the persons named as proxies will have discretion to vote on those matters in accordance with their best judgment. We do not currently anticipate that any other matters will be raised at the Annual Meeting.
Q: Can I change or revoke my vote?
____________________________________________________________________________________________
A: If you are a stockholder of record, there are three ways you can change your vote.
•Before your shares are voted at the Annual Meeting, you can file with Autodesk’s Chief Legal Officer a written notice of revocation or a duly executed proxy card, in either case dated later than the proxy card you wish to change.
•You can attend the Annual Meeting and vote online with your control number. Simply attending the Annual Meeting without actually voting will not revoke a proxy.
•If you voted online or by telephone, you may change that vote by voting again, either by making a timely and valid internet or telephone vote or by voting online during the Annual Meeting.
Any written notice of revocation or subsequent proxy card should be delivered to Autodesk’s Chief Legal Officer or sent to Autodesk, Inc., One Market Street, Ste. 400, San Francisco, California 94105, Attention: Chief Legal Officer, and must be received by the Chief Legal Officer before the vote at the Annual Meeting.
If you are a beneficial owner of shares held in street name, you can submit new voting instructions to your broker or other agent or you can attend the Annual Meeting and vote online with your control number.
Q: Who will bear the costs of soliciting votes for the Annual Meeting?
____________________________________________________________________________________________
A: Autodesk will bear all expenses of soliciting proxies, including the cost of preparing and mailing these proxy materials. Autodesk may reimburse brokerage firms, custodians, nominees, fiduciaries, and other persons representing beneficial owners of common stock for their reasonable expenses in forwarding solicitation material to such beneficial owners. Directors, officers, and other employees of Autodesk also may solicit proxies in person or by other means of communication. These individuals may be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses in connection with such solicitation, but will not receive any additional compensation. Autodesk has engaged the services of D.F. King & Co., Inc., a professional proxy solicitation firm, to help us solicit proxies from stockholders, including certain brokers, trustees, nominees, and other institutional owners, for a fee of approximately $10,500 plus costs and expenses.
Q: Where can I find the voting results of the Annual Meeting?
____________________________________________________________________________________________
A: We intend to announce preliminary voting results at the Annual Meeting and expect to provide final results in a Current Report on Form 8-K within four business days of the Annual Meeting.
2023 Proxy Statement | 77
2023 Annual Meeting
Q: Why am I receiving these proxy materials?
____________________________________________________________________________________________
A: The Board is providing these proxy materials to you in connection with the solicitation of proxies for use at our 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, to be held on Wednesday, June 21, 2023, at 3:00 p.m. Pacific Time, and at any adjournment, postponement, or other delay thereof for the purpose of considering and acting upon the matters set forth in this Proxy Statement. We are providing these materials to all of our stockholders through a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”) unless a stockholder has specifically requested a full set paper copy of this Proxy Statement and our fiscal year 2023 Annual Report.
Q: What proposals will be voted on at the Annual Meeting?
____________________________________________________________________________________________
A: At the Annual Meeting, stockholders will be asked to vote:
1.To elect the eleven directors named in this Proxy Statement to serve for the coming year and until their successors are duly elected and qualified;
2.To ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as Autodesk's independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending January 31, 2024;
3.To hold a non-binding vote to approve the compensation of our named executive officers; and
4.To hold a non-binding vote on the frequency of executive compensation votes.
Q: Can I attend the Annual Meeting?
____________________________________________________________________________________________
A: Stockholders as of the Record Date will need to use their control number on their Notice of Internet Availability or proxy card to log into www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/ADSK2023 to attend online and participate in the Annual Meeting. We encourage you to access the meeting prior to the start time. Please allow ample time for online check-in. You will be able to ask questions and vote online by following the instructions at that website.
Q: Why did I receive a Notice in the mail regarding the Internet Availability of Proxy Materials instead of a full set paper copy of this Proxy Statement and fiscal year 2023 Annual Report?
____________________________________________________________________________________________
A: We are once again relying on an SEC rule that allows companies to furnish their proxy materials over the internet rather than in paper form. This rule allows us to send all of our stockholders a Notice that explains how to access the proxy materials over the internet or how to request a paper copy of proxy materials. If you would prefer to receive proxy materials in printed form by mail or electronically by email on an ongoing basis, please follow the instructions contained in the Notice. Proxy materials for our 2024 and future annual meetings of stockholders will be delivered to you by a Notice rather than in paper form unless you specifically request to receive printed proxy materials. We encourage stockholders to take advantage of electronic delivery to help reduce the cost and environmental impact of the annual meeting.
Q: Why did I receive a full set paper copy of this Proxy Statement in the mail and not a Notice Regarding the Internet Availability of Proxy Materials?
____________________________________________________________________________________________
A: Stockholders who previously requested full paper copies of the proxy materials are receiving paper copies again this year. If you would like to reduce the costs we incur in printing and mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receive all future proxy statements, proxy cards, and annual reports electronically via email or the internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions provided on your proxy card or voting instruction form. Stockholders who hold shares through a bank, brokerage firm, or other agent may sign up for electronic delivery by contacting that broker or agent. We encourage stockholders to take advantage of electronic delivery to help reduce the cost and environmental impact of the annual meeting.
78 | AUTODESK, INC.
Q: How may I obtain a copy of Autodesk’s corporate governance documents?
____________________________________________________________________________________________
A: You can obtain a copy of the full text of the corporate governance documents discussed herein free of charge from www.autodesk.com under “Investor Relations - ESG - Corporate Governance.” We will also provide any of the foregoing information to a stockholder without charge upon written request.
Stockholder Proposals and Director Nominations for 2024 Annual Meeting
Q: How may I submit a proposal, director nomination, or present matters at next year’s stockholders meeting?
____________________________________________________________________________________________
A: You should comply with applicable Bylaws and SEC requirements, which are identified in the table below.
| Submission | Rules and Requirements | Deadline | ||||||
| Stockholder proposals for inclusion in next year’s annual meeting proxy materials | SEC Rule 14a-8 | No later than close of business (5:00 p.m. Pacific Time) on January 10, 2024 | ||||||
| Proxy Access Director Nominees | Section 2.5(d) of Bylaws | Between December 11, 2023 and close of business on January 10, 2024, assuming we do not change the date of our 2024 meeting date to be more than 25 days before or after the first anniversary of our 2023 Annual Meeting | ||||||
| Notice Provision for Other Items of Business or non-Proxy Access Director Nominees | Section 2.5(a) and (b) of Bylaws | Between February 22, 2024, and 5:00 pm Pacific time on March 23, 2024, assuming we do not change the date of our 2024 meeting to be more than 25 days before or after the first anniversary date of our 2023 Annual Meeting | ||||||
Stockholders who intend to solicit proxies in reliance on the SEC’s universal proxy rule for director nominees submitted under the advance notice requirements of our Bylaws must comply with the additional requirements of Rule 14a-19(b). We encourage stockholders who wish to submit a proposal or nomination to seek independent counsel. Autodesk will not consider any proposal or nomination that is not timely or otherwise does not meet the Bylaw and SEC requirements. We reserve the right to reject, rule out of order, or take other appropriate action with respect to any proposal that does not comply with these and other applicable requirements.
Q: How do I submit a stockholder proposal and / or director nomination?
____________________________________________________________________________________________
A: All notices of proposals by stockholders should be emailed to board-administrator@autodesk.com or mailed to Autodesk, Inc., One Market Street, Ste. 400, San Francisco, California 94105, Attention: Chief Legal Officer.
2023 Proxy Statement | 79
Additional Information About the Proxy Materials
Q: What should I do if I receive more than one set of proxy materials?
____________________________________________________________________________________________
A: You may receive more than one Proxy Statement, proxy card, voting instruction card, or Notice. For example, if you hold your shares in more than one brokerage account, you may receive a separate voting instruction card for each account. If you are a stockholder of record and your shares are registered in more than one name, you may receive more than one proxy card. Please complete, sign, date, and return each proxy card or voting instruction card that you receive to ensure that all your shares are voted.
Q: How may I obtain a separate Notice or a separate set of proxy materials and fiscal year 2023 Annual Report?
____________________________________________________________________________________________
A: If you share an address with another stockholder, it is possible you will not each receive a separate Notice or a separate copy of the proxy materials and fiscal year 2023 Annual Report. If you wish, you may request individual documents by sending an email to investor.relations@autodesk.com. Stockholders who share an address and receive multiple Notices or multiple copies of our proxy materials and fiscal year 2023 Annual Report can request to receive a single copy in the same manner.
Q: What is the mailing address for Autodesk’s principal executive offices?
____________________________________________________________________________________________
A: Autodesk’s principal executive offices are located at One Market Street, Ste. 400, San Francisco, California 94105. Any written requests for additional information, additional copies of the proxy materials and fiscal year 2023 Annual Report, notices of stockholder proposals, recommendations for candidates to the Board, communications to the Board, or any other communications should be sent to this address.
Our internet address is www.autodesk.com. The information posted on our website is not incorporated into this Proxy Statement.
Other Matters
The Board does not know of any other matters to be presented at the Annual Meeting. If any other matters are properly presented at the Annual Meeting, shares of common stock represented by proxy will be voted in accordance with the discretion of the proxy holders.
It is important that your shares be represented at the Annual Meeting, regardless of the number of shares that you hold. Autodesk urges you to vote at your earliest convenience.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
May 9, 2023
San Francisco, California
80 | AUTODESK, INC.
Appendix A
Reconciliation of GAAP financial measures to non-GAAP financial measures
This Proxy Statement contains information regarding non-GAAP financial measures: non-GAAP income from operations and free cash flow. Non-GAAP income from operations is calculated as our income from operations adjusted to exclude stock-based compensation expense, amortization of developed technologies, amortization of purchased intangibles, acquisition-related costs, and lease-related asset impairments and other charges. Free cash flow represents cash flow provided by operating activities minus capital expenditures.
We believe that these non-GAAP financial measures are appropriate to enhance an overall understanding of our fiscal year 2023 performance in relation to the principal elements of Autodesk’s annual executive compensation program considered by the Compensation and Human Resources Committee, as described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this Proxy Statement.
There are limitations in using non-GAAP financial measures because the non-GAAP financial measures are not prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and may be different from non-GAAP financial measures used by other companies. Non-GAAP financial measures are limited in value because they exclude certain items that may have a material impact upon our reported financial results. The presentation of these non-GAAP financial measures is not meant to be considered in isolation or as a substitute for the directly comparable financial measures prepared in accordance with GAAP in the United States.
The following tables reflect Autodesk's GAAP results reconciled to non-GAAP results included in this Proxy Statement:
| Fiscal Year Ended January 31, | ||||||||||||||
| 2023 | 2022 | |||||||||||||
| (in millions) (1) | (Unaudited) | |||||||||||||
| Income from operations | $ | 989 | $ | 618 | ||||||||||
| Stock-based compensation expense | 660 | 559 | ||||||||||||
| Amortization of developed technologies | 53 | 50 | ||||||||||||
| Amortization of purchased intangibles | 40 | 40 | ||||||||||||
| Acquisition-related costs | 10 | 26 | ||||||||||||
| Lease-related asset impairments and other charges | 33 | 104 | ||||||||||||
| Non-GAAP income from operations | $ | 1,785 | $ | 1,397 | ||||||||||
| Net cash provided by operating activities | $ | 2,071 | $ | 1,531 | ||||||||||
| Capital expenditures | (40) | (56) | ||||||||||||
| Free cash flow | $ | 2,031 | $ | 1,475 | ||||||||||
_____________
(1)In the current fiscal year, the Company changed its rounding presentation to the nearest whole number in millions of reported amounts, except per share data or as otherwise noted. The current year rounding presentation has been applied to all prior year amounts presented and, in certain circumstances, this change may adjust previously reported balances.
2023 Proxy Statement | 81
